Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
8 opinions for “Medical Mutual of Ohio v. AbbVie Inc.”
Medical Mutual v. Abbvie Inc.public domain
*902MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (CORRECTED) MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: Defendants in this MDL proceeding are manufacturers, sellers, and promoters of testosterone replacement therapy drugs (TRTs). Nearly all of the plaintiffs have brought lawsuits claiming personal injuries they claim were caused by TRTs. The Court has already ruled on a
Med. Mut. of Ohio v. Abbvie Inc. (In re Testosterone Replacement Therapy Prods. Liab. Litig.)public domain
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: The defendants in this civil RICO case-AbbVie Inc. and other manufacturers of testosterone replacement therapy drugs-have moved for an order barring plaintiff Medical Mutual of Ohio (MMO) from clawing back six documents it produced to defendants. Defendants argue that the attorney-client privilege does not protect the documents and that even if it does, MMO has waived the privilege. Defendants al
OPINION AND ORDER SARA L. ELLIS, United States District Judge Sidney Hillman Health Center of Rochester (“Hillman”) and Teamsters Health Services and Insurance Plan Local 404 (“Local 404,” and collectively with Hillman, the “Funds”) are multi-employer benefit plans and health services funds that provide health benefits, including prescription drug coverage, to their members. The Funds seek to represent a
Rheinfrank v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.public domain
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial. Summary Judgment Judge Susan J. Dlott, United States District Court This is a product liability case under Ohio law arising from Plaintiff Pamela Rheinfrank’s ingestion of the antiepileptic drug, , Depakote,1 during her pregnancy with her daughter, M.B
Dollens v. Goosehead Insurance, Inc.public domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MICKEY DOLLENS, on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated Class A stockholders of Goosehead Insurance, Inc., Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 2022-1018-JTL GOOSEHEAD INSURANCE, INC., Defendant. OPINION APPROVING SETTLEMENT Date Submitted: March 24, 2026 Date Decided: June 30, 2026 Thomas Cu
ACCEPTED 15-25-00207-CV Cause No. _________ FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/14/2025 4:30 PM I
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LEBANON COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ ) RETIREMENT FUND and ) TEAMSTERS LOCAL 443 HEALTH ) SERVICES & INSURANCE PLAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0527-JTL ) AMERISOURCEBERGEN
In re Epipenpublic domain
Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge This Order addresses the pending Motions to Dismiss in one of the two separate tracks of this MDL-the consumer class cases track. The consumer class track consists of cases filed by individual consumers or third-party payors who allege they purchased EpiPens for consumption by themselves, their families, or their members, employees, insureds, participants, or beneficiaries. After the