Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 02-2778 ___________ Ramiro Melecio-Saquil, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of an v. * Order of the Immigration

LOKEN, Chief Judge. Ramiro Melecio-Saquil is a Guatemalan citizen who entered the United States in 1994 without inspection. He petitions for review of an adverse decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The BIA denied Melecio’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Torture Convention. He appeals only the denial of his request for a

SMITH, Circuit Judge. Elvin Castillo-Gutierrez petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision rejecting his claims that he should not be returned to Nicaragua. *451 Castillo’s brother was brutally murdered by local police in Nicaragua. Castillo, a native Nicaraguan, fears r

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1086 JODI BOURGEOIS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. THE TJX COMPANIES, INC., Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Paul J. Barbadoro, U.S. District Judge] No. 24-1093

PER CURIAM. A former member of local government in his native Ethiopia, Binyam Bekele Baltti entered the United States in 2009 on a non-immigrant visitor visa after witnessing two government-sponsored massacres. Baltti now petitions for, review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and prote

RILEY, Circuit Judge. A former member of local government in his native Ethiopia, Binyam Bekele Baltti entered the United States in 2009 on a non-immigrant visitor visa after witnessing two government-sponsored massacres. Baltti now petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-2069 LAWRENCE ROLAND OUELLETTE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. ROGER BEAUPRE, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Biddeford Police Department; CITY OF BIDDEFORD, Defendants, Appellees, NORMAN GAUDETTE,

763 F.Supp.2d 257 (2011) Nancy Bigda PARENT, Plaintiff v. PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Checkerboard, Inc. Long Term Disability Plan, Defendant. No. C.A.10-30055-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 3, 2011. *258 Jonathan M. Feigenbaum, Phillips & Angley, Boston, MA, for Plaintiff. Hadle

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1746 DAVID CARSON, as parent and next friend of O.C.; AMY CARSON, as parent and next friend of O.C.; ALAN GILLIS, as parent and next friend of I.G.; JUDITH GILLIS, as parent and next friend of I.G.; TROY NELSON, as parent and next friend of A.N. and R.N.; ANGELA NELSON, as parent and next friend of A.N. and R.N., Plaintiffs, Appellants,

F. Dennis Saylor IV, United States District Judge This is a civil rights action arising out of the use of an incorrect Spanish-language *263advice-of-rights form by the Methuen Police. Plaintiff Patricia Pimentel is a citizen of the Dominican Republic who illegally immigrated to the United States in 2003. She was arrested for drunk driving on O

*753 MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Chay-Velasquez, a native of Guatemala, seeks political asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (Convention). The Immigration Judge (IJ) denied relief on the grounds that Chay-Velasquez had committed serious nonpolitical crimes

796 F.Supp.2d 305 (2011) Sylvester OKPOKO, Plaintiff, v. F. Gerard HEINAUER, Director, Nebraska Service Center, Alejandro Mayrkas, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, and Janet Napolitano, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Defendants. No. CA 10-43 S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. March 3, 2011.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-1493 ___________ Manuel Admin Chay-Velasquez, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of an v. * Order of the Board of

764 F.Supp.2d 328 (2011) 2011 DNH 023 Nadezda MONTGOMERY and I.V. v. Scott MONTGOMERY. Civil No. 10-cv-536-JL. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. February 9, 2011. *330 Gregory Romanovsky, Romanovsky Law Offices, Boston, MA, Ronald L. Abramson, Immigration Solutions, Manchester, NH, for Plaint

292 F.Supp.2d 298 (2003) WALGREEN CO., et al., Plaintiffs, v. John V. RULLAN, Secretary of the Puerto Rico Department of Health, Defendant. No. CIV. 00-1227(HL). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 8, 2003. *299 *300 *301

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1823 ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SMITH & WESSON BRANDS, INC.; BARRETT FIREARMS MANUFACTURING, INC.; BERETTA U.S.A. CORP.; GLOCK, INC.; STURM, RUGER & COMPANY, INC.; WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP, INC., d/b/a Interstate Arms; CENTURY INTERNATIONAL ARMS, INC.; BARETTA HOLDINGS SPA; GLOCK GES.M.B.H.

792 F.Supp.2d 117 (2011) John A. GABLE and Wendy L. Gable, Plaintiffs v. BORGES CONSTRUCTION, INC., Town of Cheshire, and Brian Tenczar, Defendants. C.A. No. 10-cv-30222-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 17, 2011. *119 Michael K. Callan, Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, P.C., Springfield, MA, John

WIENER, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether a federal district court can enjoin the production of information ordered produced by a Louisiana state court’s subpoena duces tecum. Because the Rooker-Feldman doctrine forecloses federal subject matter jurisdiction in this case, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand with instructions to dismiss this action in its entirety.</

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-2270 ___________ Zahra A. Mohamed; Shukri Salah; * Abdulkadir Salah; Hamida Salah; * Abdi Salah, * * Petitioners, * * Petition

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HELEN KRUKAS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 18-1124 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell AARP, Inc., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff,