Cases

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 17, 2011 Session STEPHEN TODD MAYS v. MELISSA GAIL MAYS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wilson County No. 6281DVC Clara W. Byrd, Judge No. M2010-02479-COA-R3-CV - Filed April 23, 2012 In this divorce action, Husband appeals the trial court’s determination of the amount of his mo

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-17-00026-CV ____________________ MELISSA BARCLAY, Appellant V. AURY GENE RICHEY, Appellee ________________________________________________________

28 F.3d 113 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. UNI

817 P.2d 598 (1991) AMAX POTASH CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANS-RESOURCES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 90CA0763. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III. July 5, 1991. Rehearing Denied August 15, 1991. *599 Rothgerber, Appel, Powers & Johnson, Frederick J. Baumann, Melissa A. Muilenburg, Denver, Paul

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Frank W. Volk, Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of West Virginia. Pending is the Partial Motion to Dismiss (“Motion to Dismiss”) [Dckt. 6], filed April 4, 2016, by Defendant Universal Federal Credit Union (“Universal”). Universal seeks dismissal of Plaintiff Melissa Gail Adkins’ claims for violations of (1) the West Virginia Consumer Cr

Hon, Virginia M. Kendall, United States District Judge Plaintiff Anne Melissa Dowling,1 in her capacity as Acting Director of the Illinois Department of Insurance, initiated liquidation proceedings in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois for the Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company, In the Matter of Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Co. , No. 2016 CH 9210. In that

OPINION EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice. Appellant, Melissa Ann Skillern, was convicted by a jury of a single count of misapplication of fiduciary property valued between $20,000 and $100,000 from an elderly person.1 The jury assessed her punishment at fifty-four months’ confinement and a $10,000 fine and recommended that the prison term be suspended. The trial court pronounced the se

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER GARY L. SHARPE, District Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiff Melissa Atkinson commenced this action against defendants New York State Olympic Regional Development Authority (ORDA), Gail Setlock, David Bulmer, and Michael Pratt, asserting claims of hostile work environment, gender-based discrimination, and retaliation pursuant to Title VII

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

439 F.Supp.2d 268 (2006) Dennis SINDONE, Plaintiff, v. Raymond KELLY, as Commissioner of the New York City Police Department Bernard B. Kerik, as Former Commissioner of the New York City Police Department, the New York City Police Department; and the City of New York, Defendants. No. 05 Civ. 7860(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 6, 2006.

1 A.3d 1254 (2010) 123 Conn.App. 479 STATE of Connecticut v. Edward P. LYNCH. No. 29622. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued April 9, 2010. Decided August 31, 2010. *1258 Hope C. Seeley, with whom, on the brief, was Benjamin B. Adams, Hartford, for the appellant (defendant). Meli

Opinion ALVORD, J. The defendant, Matthew Boutilier, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-55 (a) (1) and 53a-55a. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court abused its discretion in (1) denying his motion to allow the jury to view the crime scene, and (2) denying his

LAVINE, J. In recent years, the United States and Connecticut Supreme Courts have made major changes in the jurisprudence relating to juvenile sentencing. The law now requires that juvenile offenders facing life without parole or its functional equivalent are entitled to individual consideration that takes into account the mitigating factors of their youth. This case concerns the import

ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER: ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: MELISSA G. MICHIE THEODORE E. ROKITA FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA REATH, LLP J. DEREK ATWOOD Indianapolis, IN LYDIA A. GOLTEN STEPHEN J. REEN DEPUTY ATTORNEYS GENERAL

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o

Murray, C.J. *399 *517 The question presented is whether petitioner, Ann Breakey, as a result of an irrevocable trust granting her the ability to remain in the marital home rent-free in order to

Sadler, Judge. {¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Pickaway County Skilled Gaming, L.L.C., d.b.a. Spinners Skill Stop Game (“Spinners”), and Stephen S. Cline (collectively “appellants”), appeal from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, in which that court denied appellants’ motion for summary judgment and granted the motion for summary judgment of defendants-appellees, Richard Cordray, Ohio Attorney General; H

125 F.Supp.2d 299 (2000) NORTHERN BORDER PIPELINE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. 64.111 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, in Will County, Illinois, Donald A. Werner, et al., and Unknown Others, Defendants. No. 00 C 3122. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. November 22, 2000. *300 Alexander Moskovic, Moskovic & R

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr