Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Melissa Irene Brown”
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00044-CV ___________________________ ONE MONTGOMERY PLAZA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant V. ALISA GAIL BROWN, RICHARD WAYNE BROWN, ANN MARRETT, ELIZABETH DOANE, WILLIAM T. SLATER, CAROL NATI, CARMENZ
People v. Thompsonpublic domain
49 Cal.4th 79 (2010) 109 Cal. Rptr. 3d 549 231 P.3d 289 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAMES ALVIN THOMPSON, Defendant and Appellant. No. S056891. Supreme Court of California. May 24, 2010. *86 Irene Kiebert, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appell
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-16-00662-CV Melissa FUENTES, Individually, and as Next Friend of Victor Robert Fuentes and Isabella Elaine Fuentes, Minors, Appellant v.
Heusner Vs. The Exec. Dep'T Of The State Of Nev.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ALLEN STANISLOUIS HEUSNER, No. 79076 Appellant, vs. THE EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA; GOVERNOR BRIAN SANDOVAL, AND FORMER GOVERNORS; STEVEN WOLFSON, CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ADAM
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-18-00596-CV BROWN SIMS, P.C. and Nelson D. Skyler, Appellants v. L.W. MATTESON, INC., AGCS Marine Insurance Company, and New York Marine and
Mei-Gsr Holdings, Llc v. Thomaspublic domain
Supreme Count OF NEVADA (0) 167A <i IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MEI-GSR HOLDINGS, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; GRAND SIERRA RESORT UNIT OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, A NEVADA NON-PROFIT CORPORATION; GAGE VILLAGE COMMERICAL DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND AM-GSR HOLDINGS, LLC, ANEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Appellants, vs. ALBERT THOMAS, INDIVIDUALLY; JANE DUNLAP, INDIVIDUALLY; JOHN DUNLAP, INDIVIDUALLY; BARRY HAY, INDIVIDUALLY; MARIE
Watson v. Watsonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA22-473 Filed 04 April 2023 Catawba County, No. 20-CVD-408 TONYA IRENE SARTOR WATSON, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS STEUART WATSON, Defendant. Appeal by plaintiff from judgment entered 15 July 2021 by Judge Robert A. Mullinax, Jr., in Catawba County District Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 24 January 2023. Robinson and Lawing, LLP, by L. Br
Southpointe Golf Club, Pet v. Southpointe Propertypublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT SOUTHPOINTE GOLF CLUB, INC., : No. 217 WAL 2021 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the v. : Commonwealth Court :
Brian Berry v. Travis Lesliepublic domain
WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree with the majority opinion that the search of the barbershop exceeded the scope of a reasonable administrative inspection and that the barbers presented evidence that Corporal Keith Vidler, as the supervisor, violated their clearly established constitutional rights. I also agree that Brian Berry pr
Rodriguez v. Shulmanpublic domain
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman. Before the Panel: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiffs Irene and Isidoro Rodriguez have moved to centralize this litigation in the Western District of Washington or an “impartial panel” comprised of jurists outside the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and D.C. Circuits. Three groups of defendants oppose centralization:1 <
in Re Nettie Bivenspublic domain
NUMBER 13-20-00563-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE NETTIE BIVENS, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Injunction. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion
In re Application to the Bar of Statepublic domain
On motion of F. Aaron Negangard, Chief Deputy Attorney General of the State of Indiana, and Cathleen M. Shrader, President of the State Board of Law Examiners, both members of the Bar of this Court, each applicant named in Exhibit A is by Order of this Court now duly sworn and admitted to practice as an attorney at law, and their respective names are ordered entered upon the Roll of Attorneys of this Court in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Cou
340 S.W.3d 352 (2011) Dalton Reb HUGHES et al. v. The METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, Tennessee et al. No. M2008-02060-SC-R11-CV. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. February 3, 2011 Session. May 24, 2011. Rehearing Denied June 14, 2011. *354 Kevin C. Klein, Andrew
Witkiewicz v. Acands, Inc.public domain
PER CURIAM. The Appellants with and on behalf of thirty-five other plaintiffs filed thirty-six appeals of trial court orders dismissing their cases based on their failure to satisfy the requirements of the Asbestos and Silica Compensation Fairness Act (“ASCFA”), section 774.201, Florida Statutes (2005). These appeals had been stayed pending the Supreme Court’s review of Williams v. American Optical Corp., 985 So.2d
455 F.Supp.2d 788 (2006) LAST ATLANTIS CAPITAL LLC, Lola LLC, Lulu LLC, Goodbuddy Society LLC, Friendly Trading LLC, and Speed Trading LLC, Bryan Rule, Brad Martin, and River North Investors, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. CHICAGO BOARD OPTIONS EXCHANGE, INC., American Stock Exchange LLC, Pacific Exchange, Inc., Philadelphia Exchange, Inc., AGS Specialist Partners, Bear Hunter Structured Products LLC, Bear Wagner Specialists LLC, Botta Capital Management LL
Hobart Corp. v. Dayton Power & Light Co.public domain
WALTER H. RICE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is currently before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendant *891Valley Asphalt Corporation's Amended Counterclaim, Doc. # 794, and Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendant The Dayton Power & Light Company's Amended Counterclaim, Doc. # 798. I. Bac
DATE: 11/18/2016 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 12:45:21 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302016 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED ________________________________________________________
HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITYpublic domain
HIRSCHFELD v. OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY2023 OK 59Case Number: 120981Decided: 05/31/2023THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2023 OK 59, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT IS SUBJECT TO REVISION OR WITHDRAWAL.
In Re Stephen P. Callahan.public domain
This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") against respondent, Stephen P. Callahan, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana but currently on interim suspension for threat of harm to the public. In re: Callahan, 09-0404 (La.2/20/09), 2 So.3d 431. UNDERLYING FACTS Counts I II — The Brown Matter In September
ADKINS v. UNION PAC. R.R. CO.public domain
140 Nev., Advance Opinion Lig IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MELINDA ADKINS, AN INDIVIDUAL; No. 85569 GERALD ED ANDREWS, AN INDIVIDUAL; THE ESTATE OF RICH ROMER, DECEASED, BY PRISCILLA ROMER BARATA, AS PERSONAL FILED REPRESENTATIVE, INDIVIDUALLY