Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Melissa L Scott”
ZAGER, Justice. After Scott Mihm filed a petition to modify their divorce decree, his former wife Melissa counterclaimed seeking an increase in child support. As part of the original stipulation, the parties agreed to a child support amount below that provided by the child support guidelines. The district court incorporated this stipulation into its decree of dissolution without n
State v. Scottpublic domain
Opinion MIHALAKOS, J. The defendant, Jason Scott, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion *335to correct an illegal sentence. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his request for counsel to be provided to him in connection with his motion to correct. The state contests our subject matt
SCOTT O. KENT v. MELISSA KENTpublic domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT SCOTT O. KENT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v.
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.public domain
OPINION & ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: The plaintiff and class representative Maxcimo Scott filed a nationwide class and collective action complaint on November 15, 2012, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq. (“FLSA” or the “Act”), and the New York Minimum Wage Act, N.Y. Lab. Law, art. 6 § 190 et seq., art. 19 § 650 et seq. (“NYL
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.public domain
ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiffs filed a complaint on November 15, 2012, and an amended complaint on Feb*190ruary 13, 2013, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. (“FLSA”), and the New York Minimum Wage Act, N.Y. Lab. Law, art. 6 §§ 190 et seq., art.
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.public domain
OPINION & ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: The plaintiff and class representative Max-cimo Scott filed a nationwide class and collective action complaint on November 15, 2012, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq. (“FLSA” *39or the “Act”), and the New York Minimum Wage Act, N.Y. Lab. Law,
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: This discovery dispute arises between plaintiffs and defendant corporation Chipo-tle Mexican Grill, Inc., in a nationwide collective action alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§• 201 et seq. (“FLSA” or the “Act”), and class action claims under the New York Minimum Wage Act, N.Y. Lab. Law, art. 6 §§ 1
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.public domain
ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: On March 27, 2015, the Court issued a Memorandum and Order (the “March 27 Order”) (ECF No. 942) granting in part and denying in part the plaintiffs’ motion to compel the production of certain documents. In relevant part, the Court ruled that the report of consultant Cinda Dag-gett (the “Daggett Report”) was not privileged because Daggett was
North Shore Energy, L.L.C. v. John James Harkinspublic domain
*600 PER CURIAM This case involves the interpretation of an option contract between landowners and an oil and gas company. The parties disagree on the interpretation of the land description in the contract. The landowners contend that the description excluded a 400-acre tract, and the oil and gas company
Ohio Neighborhood Fin., Inc. v. Scott (Slip Opinion)public domain
Pfeifer, J., concurring. {¶ 42} I concur in the majority opinion. I write separately because something about the case doesn’t seem right. {¶ 43} There was great angst in the air. Payday lending was a scourge. It had to be eliminated or at least controlled. So the General Assembly enacted a bill, the Short-Term Lender Act (“STLA”), R.C. 1321
Ritchie Capital Management, L.L.C. v. Jeffriespublic domain
653 F.3d 755 (2011) RITCHIE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.; Ritchie Special Credit Investments, Ltd.; Rhone Holdings II, Ltd.; Yorkville Investments, I, LLC; and Ritchie Capital Structure Arbitrage Trading, Ltd., Appellants, v. Mary JEFFRIES and Camille Chee-Awai, Appellees. No. 10-2568. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: May 10, 2011. Filed
Petition for review granted in part and denied in part; cross-application for enforcement granted in part and denied in part by published opinion. Chief Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge KEENAN and Judge HARWELL joined. TRAXLER, Chief Judge: Gestamp South Carolina, LLC, petitioned for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“
Scott v. ING Clarion Partners, LLCpublic domain
PER CURIAM: After review and oral argument, the Court concludes that Appellants Bobby L. Scott and Melissa Thompson, proceeding individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, have not shown any reversible error in the district court’s orders dated October 31, 2006 and May 7, 2007. Thus, the Court affirms those orders. AFFIRMED.
hMOTION TO DISMISS APPEALS GRANTED Appellee, Cannisnia Plantation, L.L.C., has filed a motion to dismiss the above-captioned consolidated appeals on the basis that the judgment appealed was not properly certified as a final judgment under the provisions of La. C.C.P. art. 1915(B). On November 15, 2006, the trial court signed a judgment granting Cannisnia’s partial motion for summary judgment finding that none of the Governor
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2025 WY 8 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2024 January 14, 2025 L. MICHAEL SORENSEN and SHERI M. SORENSEN, individually and as Trustees of the Sheri M. Sorensen Living Trust dated May 15, 2012; JENNIFER ANNE TWISS and SCOTT JAMES TWISS, Appellants (Plaintiffs, v.
Melissa Kopaska v. Paula McNeilpublic domain
Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 602 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-23-413 MELISSA KOPASKA Opinion Delivered December 11, 2024 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE BENTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COUR
Melissa Kopaska v. Paula McNeilpublic domain
Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 602 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-23-413 MELISSA KOPASKA Opinion Delivered December 11, 2024 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE BENTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COUR
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2025 WY 8 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2024 January 14, 2025 L. MICHAEL SORENSEN and SHERI M. SORENSEN, individually and as Trustees of the Sheri M. Sorensen Living Trust dated May 15, 2012; JENNIFER ANNE TWISS and SCOTT JAMES TWISS, Appellants (Plaintiffs, v.
Melissa Kopaska v. Paula McNeilpublic domain
Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 602 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-23-413 MELISSA KOPASKA Opinion Delivered December 11, 2024 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE BENTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COUR
Melissa L. Bleigh v. Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc., and HG Energy II Appalachia, LLCpublic domain
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED December 23, 2024 MELISSA L. BLEIGH, ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK Plaintiff Below, Petitioner INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS