⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Melissa L Scott”

Supreme Court of Iowa · 2014-01-24 · Published · cited 3× · 842 N.W.2d 378; 2014 WL 265485; 2014 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 9
ZAGER, Justice. After Scott Mihm filed a petition to modify their divorce decree, his former wife Melissa counterclaimed seeking an increase in child support. As part of the original stipulation, the parties agreed to a child support amount below that provided by the child support guidelines. The district court incorporated this stipulation into its decree of dissolution without n
State v. Scottpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012-11-27 · Published · cited 1× · 139 Conn. App. 333; 55 A.3d 608; 2012 Conn. App. LEXIS 553
Opinion MIHALAKOS, J. The defendant, Jason Scott, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion *335to correct an illegal sentence. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly denied his request for counsel to be provided to him in connection with his motion to correct. The state contests our subject matt
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020-09-18 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT SCOTT O. KENT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v.
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-12-18 · Published · cited 26× · 67 F. Supp. 3d 607; 24 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 137; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175775; 2014 WL 7236907
OPINION & ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: The plaintiff and class representative Maxcimo Scott filed a nationwide class and collective action complaint on November 15, 2012, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq. (“FLSA” or the “Act”), and the New York Minimum Wage Act, N.Y. Lab. Law, art. 6 § 190 et seq., art. 19 § 650 et seq. (“NYL
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-06-06 · Published · cited 5× · 300 F.R.D. 188; 2014 WL 2600034; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79706
ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiffs filed a complaint on November 15, 2012, and an amended complaint on Feb*190ruary 13, 2013, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. (“FLSA”), and the New York Minimum Wage Act, N.Y. Lab. Law, art. 6 §§ 190 et seq., art.
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-04-15 · Published · cited 68× · 315 F.R.D. 33; 100 Fed. R. Serv. 201; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51341; 2016 WL 1531818
OPINION & ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: The plaintiff and class representative Max-cimo Scott filed a nationwide class and collective action complaint on November 15, 2012, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq. (“FLSA” *39or the “Act”), and the New York Minimum Wage Act, N.Y. Lab. Law,
District Court, S.D. New York · 2015-03-27 · Published · cited 15× · 94 F. Supp. 3d 585; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40176; 2015 WL 1424009
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: This discovery dispute arises between plaintiffs and defendant corporation Chipo-tle Mexican Grill, Inc., in a nationwide collective action alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§• 201 et seq. (“FLSA” or the “Act”), and class action claims under the New York Minimum Wage Act, N.Y. Lab. Law, art. 6 §§ 1
District Court, S.D. New York · 2015-05-07 · Published · cited 0× · 103 F. Supp. 3d 542; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60578; 2015 WL 2182674
ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: On March 27, 2015, the Court issued a Memorandum and Order (the “March 27 Order”) (ECF No. 942) granting in part and denying in part the plaintiffs’ motion to compel the production of certain documents. In relevant part, the Court ruled that the report of consultant Cinda Dag-gett (the “Daggett Report”) was not privileged because Daggett was
Texas Supreme Court · 2016-10-28 · Published · cited 43× · 501 S.W.3d 598; 60 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 48; 2016 Tex. LEXIS 964; 2016 WL 6311285
*600 PER CURIAM This case involves the interpretation of an option contract between landowners and an oil and gas company. The parties disagree on the interpretation of the land description in the contract. The landowners contend that the description excluded a 400-acre tract, and the oil and gas company
Ohio Supreme Court · 2014-06-11 · Published · cited 53× · 2014 Ohio 2440; 139 Ohio St. 3d 536; 13 N.E.3d 1115
Pfeifer, J., concurring. {¶ 42} I concur in the majority opinion. I write separately because something about the case doesn’t seem right. {¶ 43} There was great angst in the air. Payday lending was a scourge. It had to be eliminated or at least controlled. So the General Assembly enacted a bill, the Short-Term Lender Act (“STLA”), R.C. 1321
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011-09-06 · Published · cited 40× · 653 F.3d 755; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18469; 2011 WL 3890323
653 F.3d 755 (2011) RITCHIE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.; Ritchie Special Credit Investments, Ltd.; Rhone Holdings II, Ltd.; Yorkville Investments, I, LLC; and Ritchie Capital Structure Arbitrage Trading, Ltd., Appellants, v. Mary JEFFRIES and Camille Chee-Awai, Appellees. No. 10-2568. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: May 10, 2011. Filed
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014-10-08 · Published · cited 21× · 769 F.3d 254; 201 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3065; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 19194
Petition for review granted in part and denied in part; cross-application for enforcement granted in part and denied in part by published opinion. Chief Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge KEENAN and Judge HARWELL joined. TRAXLER, Chief Judge: Gestamp South Carolina, LLC, petitioned for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008-01-23 · Published · cited 0× · 262 F. App'x 983
PER CURIAM: After review and oral argument, the Court concludes that Appellants Bobby L. Scott and Melissa Thompson, proceeding individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, have not shown any reversible error in the district court’s orders dated October 31, 2006 and May 7, 2007. Thus, the Court affirms those orders. AFFIRMED.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007-01-25 · Published · cited 0× · 947 So. 2d 235; 2007 WL 178892
hMOTION TO DISMISS APPEALS GRANTED Appellee, Cannisnia Plantation, L.L.C., has filed a motion to dismiss the above-captioned consolidated appeals on the basis that the judgment appealed was not properly certified as a final judgment under the provisions of La. C.C.P. art. 1915(B). On November 15, 2006, the trial court signed a judgment granting Cannisnia’s partial motion for summary judgment finding that none of the Governor
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2025-01-14 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 WY 8
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2025 WY 8 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2024 January 14, 2025 L. MICHAEL SORENSEN and SHERI M. SORENSEN, individually and as Trustees of the Sheri M. Sorensen Living Trust dated May 15, 2012; JENNIFER ANNE TWISS and SCOTT JAMES TWISS, Appellants (Plaintiffs, v.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024-12-11 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 Ark. App. 602
Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 602 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-23-413 MELISSA KOPASKA Opinion Delivered December 11, 2024 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE BENTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COUR
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024-12-11 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 Ark. App. 602
Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 602 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-23-413 MELISSA KOPASKA Opinion Delivered December 11, 2024 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE BENTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COUR
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2025-01-14 · Published · cited 11× · 561 P.3d 1241; 2025 WY 8
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2025 WY 8 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2024 January 14, 2025 L. MICHAEL SORENSEN and SHERI M. SORENSEN, individually and as Trustees of the Sheri M. Sorensen Living Trust dated May 15, 2012; JENNIFER ANNE TWISS and SCOTT JAMES TWISS, Appellants (Plaintiffs, v.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024-12-11 · Published · cited 1× · 2024 Ark. App. 602
Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 602 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-23-413 MELISSA KOPASKA Opinion Delivered December 11, 2024 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE BENTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COUR
Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia · 2024-12-23 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED December 23, 2024 MELISSA L. BLEIGH, ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK Plaintiff Below, Petitioner INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS