Cases

681 S.E.2d 199 (2009) The STATE v. GOODE. No. A09A0362. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 7, 2009. *200 Barry Edward Morgan, Solicitor-Gen., Jessica K. Moss, Melissa Cox Brickey, Solicitor-Gen., for appellant. Herman Maddox Kilgore, for appellee. BERNES, Judge. Ashley Lauren Goode was arrested for driving und

2020 UT App 62 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS JAMES J. ISSERTELL JR., Appellee, v. TISH KRISTINA ISSERTELL, Appellant. Opinion No. 20190467-CA Filed April 16, 2020 Second District Court, Farmington Department The Hono

14 A.3d 524 (2011) Melissa BROWN,[1] Respondent Below, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES, Petitioner Below, Appellee. No. 480, 2010. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: January 12, 2011. Decided: February 14, 2011. *526 Julie H. Yeager, Esquire, of Tybout, Redfearn & Pell, Wilmington, Del

KELLUM, Judge. Matthew Reeves appeals the circuit court’s denial of his petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., in which he attacked his capital-murder conviction and sentence of death. In 1998, Reeves was convicted of murder made capital because it was committed during the course of a robbery in the first degree, see § 13A-5-40(a)(2), Ala.Code 1975. By a vote of 10-

711 F.Supp.2d 369 (2010) James Elder MORRISON, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Third-Party Defendant. Civil No. 1:09-CV-0324. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. May 10, 2010. *374 Melissa A. Guiddy, Robert W. King, King & Guiddy, Gr

DATE: 03/13/2017 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:23:09 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 08312016 GROUP 2, REINST FEE ASSESSED ________________________________________________________

364 F.3d 1276 Dennis EDIC, as parent and next friend of Dylan EDIC, minor son, Melissa Edic, as parent and next friend of Dylan Edic, minor son, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CENTURY PRODUCTS COMPANY, a foreign corporation and a division of Graco Children's Products, Inc., a foreign corporation, both subsidiaries of Newell-Rubbermaid, a foreign corporation, Newell-Rubbermaid, a foreign corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Hamid Harris v. City of Newark (A-59-20) (085028) Argued November 30, 2021 -- Decided March 30, 2022 JUSTICE PATTERSON, writing for a unanimous Court. In this appeal, the Court reviews the

566 S.E.2d 839 (2002) Carolyn J. POOLE, Plaintiff-Employee, v. TAMMY LYNN CENTER, Defendant-Employer, and Aetna Life & Casualty Co., Defendant-Carrier. No. COA01-1178. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 6, 2002. The Jernigan Law Firm, by N. Victor Farah and Gina E. Cammarano, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant. Hedrick, Eatman, Gardner, & Ki

MEMORANDUM & ORDER GORTON, J. Plaintiff Oxford Immunotec Ltd. (“plaintiff’ or “Oxford”) alleges defendants Qia-gen, Inc., Quest Diagnostics, Inc. and Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (“defendants” or “Qiagen”) infringed its patents relating to a method and kit for diagnosing tuberculosis. Oxford seeks a preliminary injunction to enjoin Qiagen from selling the

ORDER LOVE, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is Fenner Investments, Ltd.’s (“Fenner”), motion to compel worldwide financial information from Defendant, Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”) (Doc. 239). After considering the parties’ briefing and oral argument, the Court issues the following order.1 On January 6, 2005, Fenner filed this pat

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge. INTRODUCTION This putative class action arises out of the marketing and sale of “Truvia” sweetener products by Defendant Cargill, Incorporated (“Cargill”). Presently before the Court are (1) the Motion of Plaintiffs Molly Martin and Lauren Barry for preliminary approval of a nationwide settlement and certificat

PD-1330-15 PD-1330-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 11/23/2015 4:34:43 PM Accepted 11/24/2015 11:52:10 AM No.

19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY

Opinion filed March 10, 2011 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-09-00247-CR __________ ALEX RICARDO SALDANA, Appellant V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 238th D

Opinion filed March 10, 2011 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals

2023 IL App (5th) 230035 NOTICE Decision filed 01/31/23. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-23-0035 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _______________________________________________________________

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1960 In re: KBR, INC., Burn Pit Litigation. ------------------------------ ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744; PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744; JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748; JOANNE OCHS, RWT 09-2747; MELISSA OCHS, RWT 09-2747; JAMES MORGAN, RWT 09-2747; DAVID NEWTON, RWT

17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Everhart v. Coshocton Cty. Mem. Hosp., Slip Opinion No. 2023-Ohio-4670.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any