Cases

Affirmed and Opinion and Concurring Opinion filed April 22, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00175-CV MELISSA MARIE LOBUE, Appellant V. TODD H. HANSON D/B/A THE BARN AT FOUR PINES RANCH, Appellee On Appeal from the 269th District Court Harris County, Texas T

974 A.2d 276 (2009) 2009 ME 57 Kelly Jo COOKSON v. BREWER SCHOOL DEPARTMENT et al. Docket: Pen-07-706 Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued: May 15, 2008. Decided: June 2, 2009. *278 Arthur J. Greif, Esq. (orally), Andrea V.W. Wan, Esq., Julie D. Farr, Esq., Gilbert & Greif, P.A., Ba

OPINION AND ORDER Mark A. Barnett, Judge Barnett, Judge: ABB, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “ABB”) and Hyosung Corporation (“Hyosung”) each challenge certain aspects of the final results of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) second administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large power transformers from the Republic of Korea for the period of revie

Kelly, Judge: This action is before the court on a United States Court of International Trade Rule 56.2 motion for judgment on *1366the agency record challenging certain aspects of the U.S. Department of Commerce's ("Department" or "Commerce") final determination in the countervailing duty ("CVD") investigation of certain corrosion-resista

298 S.W.3d 663 (2009) Abel LUCIO, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. The JOHN G. AND MARIE STELLA KENEDY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION, Appellee. No. 13-08-00077-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. June 25, 2009. Rehearing Overruled September 17, 2009. *665 Charles B. Frye, Lindeman & Frye, Houston, TX, fo

657 F.Supp.2d 276 (2009) A123 SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. HYDRO-QUÉBEC, Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-10612-JLT. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 28, 2009. *277 Jeffrey S. Gleason, Rebecca Ross-Bown, Mary Rose Scozzafava, Wayne L. Stoner, Jonathan J. Thessin, Wilmer Hale LLP, Boston, MA, for Plaintiff.<

NUMBER 13-08-00077-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRIS

559 F.3d 874 (2009) Jan FALLO; Pamela Epperson; Laura Muehlan; Verne Anderson; Amy Clark; Yulanda Diamond; Monica Licklider; Latonya Love; Mary McNurlin; Jessica Richardson; Kisha Robinson; Patricia Stuteville; Zach Green; Dene Beck; Carrie Boyer; Jamika Brewer; Yulanda Boyd; Kelly Brewster; Kristeena Cloud; Jenna Edelen; LaToya Hardin; Tameila Hardley; Tynesha Hooker; Luctoine Jean-Philippe; Barbara Johnson; DeAndre Johnson; Alonzo Jones; Margie Kelley;

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-300-CV JASON MARIS, P.A.-C APPELLANT V. TADD HENDRICKS, AS APPELLEES INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF MELISSA HENDRICKS, DECEASED, AND TADD HENDRICKS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF JOSHUA A

ACCEPTED 06-15-00017-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 6/5/2015 3:05:45 PM

</

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-07-300-CV JASON MARIS, P.A.-C APPELLANT V.

Opinion of the Court by Justice VENTERS. Each of the Appellants in this action was a plaintiff in a lawsuit brought in the Boone Circuit Court,1 Boone County, Kentucky, against American Home Products, the company that marketed the anti-obesity drug combination commonly known as “Fen-Phen.” As further explained below, Appellants’ claims in that case were transferred from the Boone

Barnett, Judge: In this consolidated action, Plaintiff POSCO ("POSCO"), Plaintiff Nucor Corporation *1326("Nucor"), and Plaintiff-Intervenors ArcelorMittal USA LLC, AK Steel Corporation, and United States Steel Corporation challenge the final determination of the U.S. Department of Commerce ("Commerce" or the "agency") in its countervailin

Choe-Groves, Judge: *1351 This case reviews the U.S. Department of Commerce's ("Commerce") methodology when selecting the highest calculated rate after applying facts otherwise available with an adverse inference ("adverse facts available" or "AFA") and Commerce's corroboration of those

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 14a0145p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - WILLARD MCCARLEY, -

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUSAN K. GAUVEY, United States Magistrate Judge. Now pending before this Court is defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment, (ECF No. 36), and plaintiffs cross-motion for partial summary judgment. (ECF No. 40). A hearing was held on May 9, 2013. Both parties have submitted supplemental briefing at the Court’s request. (ECF No. 47; ECF No. 51; ECF No. 52). For the reason

Choe-Groves, Judge: This case involves certain hot-rolled steel flat products from the Republic of Korea ("Korea"). Plaintiff POSCO and Consolidated Plaintiff Nucor Corporation ("Nucor") bring this action contesting various aspects of the final determination in a countervailing duty investigation, in which the U.S. Department of Commerce ("Commerce" or "Department") found that counter

OPINION BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of Petitioner Willard McCar-le/s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. McCarley argued in his petition that the Ohio Court of Appeals unreasonably applied clearly established Sixth Amendment law by allowing a child psychologist to rea

MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge. Presently pending and ready for resolution in this action are three motions filed by Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff the United States of America:1 (1) a motion for summary judgment against Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Mary Johnson (ECF No. 80), (2) a motion for summary judgment against Counterclaim Defendant