Cases

SECOND DIVISION MILLER, P. J., DOYLE, P. J., and REESE, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules February 2, 2018

Miller, Presiding Judge. Appellee Mell Davenport was injured while parking his car when the driver in the adjacent space opened his car door in Davenport's path and the two collided. Davenport sued the other driver and served his own uninsured motorist carrier, Haulers Insurance Company ("Haulers"), under OCGA § 33-7-11 (d). Haulers answered in its own name and moved for summary judgment on the ground that its policy excluded covera

USCA11 Case: 23-10273 Document: 83-1 Date Filed: 09/16/2025 Page: 1 of 21 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10273 ____________________ ANTHONY DAVID NUTE,

Chief Justice TOAL, concurring in part, dissenting in part: I concur in part and respectfully dissent in part. Although I agree with the majority’s adoption of the rule imposing limited social host liability, I would reverse and remand both cases and allow the parties to litigate their disputes under the rule adopted by the Court. Generally, judicial decisi

OPINION Russell Lloyd, Justice Appellant Elizabeth M. Trammell appeals from the trial court’s order granting appellee Fletcher Y. Trammell’s amended petition to modify terms of a prior final decree of divorce relating to child support and specified parental rights. In four issues, Elizabeth contends that the trial court erred by (1) decreasing the amount

339 F.Supp. 969 (1972) William G. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. PHOENIX FURNITURE COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 71-971. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division. March 21, 1972. *970 Roy E. Garris, of Garris & Garris, Columbia, S. C., for plaintiff. R. Bruce Shaw, of Nelson, Mullins, Grier & Scar

(2008) Rinaldo DEL GALLO, III, Plaintiff v. Roger PARENT, et al., Defendants. C.A. No. 06-30063-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 28, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF (Dkt. Nos. 31, 35, 38, and 39) PONSOR, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN R. TUNHEIM, Chief Judge Plaintiffs Carl and Angel Larsen and Telescope Media Group (“TMG”) 1 bring a pre-enforcement challenge to the ban on sexual orientation discrimination in public accommodations and contracting in the Minnesota Human Rights Act (“MHRA”). The Larsens operate a videography business, and they plan to expand into the weddin

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

George Cunningham has appealed from an order of the district court of Wichita county restraining him as sheriff from selling a tract of land under an execution issued on a certain judgment rendered by that court. A copy of the judgment so rendered was attached to plaintiff's petition for injunctive relief. The pleadings in that suit do not appear in the record here except by inference from recitals in the judgment. The style of the case in which that judgment was rendered was "J. Carut

200 B.R. 427 (1996) In re Steve ROLLINS, Debtor. Steven ROLLINS, Plaintiff, v. Diane M. CAMPBELL, Ben Smith, and Frank Baker, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. A93-67408-REB. Adversary No. 93-6598. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. August 20, 1996. *428 *429 Hirsch F

LOZIER, C. This is an appeal from a judgment entered in an action for damages resulting from a collision between appellant’s car, and respondent’s truck on U. S. Route 69, north of Excelsior Springs, October 11, 1946. Plaintiff asked $15,000 for personal injuries and $500 for damage to his car. Defendant counterclaimed for $350 for damage to his truck. Verdict and judgment were for defendant on plaintiff’s claim and for defendant f

ACCEPTED 03-15-00596-CV 8332526 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

Roberts, J. Appellants claim the land in controversy as the children of Josiah Hancock, deceased, under the deed of their grandfather, John Hancock, which reads as follows : “ South Carolina, Edgefield District “ Know all men by these presents, that I, John Hancock, of the State and District aforesaid, for and in consideration of the love and natural affection I bear unto and for my beloved son, Josiah

The Surrogate. The numerous progeny of this testator, who himself died in 1838, may be classified by generations as follows: 1st. Seven children survived him—all are now dead. 2d. Two of these seven left no child or other descendant. The other five left children, and some child or children of each of those five still live. 3d. T

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, Chief Judge. Cold Metal Process Company (hereinafter called Cold Metal) brought this suit on March 20, 1945 against Aluminum Company of America (hereinafter called Alcoa) for infringement of U. S. Letters Patent Nos. 1,774,016 and 1,779,-195 issued respectively on January 14, 1930 and October 21, 1930 and referred to herein as ’016 and ’195. Each patent was issued upon the original application of Abram P. S