Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Mello v. Gustafson”
Gustafson v. Wassonpublic domain
The defendant appeals, by the alternative method, from a judgment against him. In the appellant's opening brief it is stated that in the action the plaintiff claimed an easement to the flow of rainwaters in a certain ditch on lands of the defendant and damages caused by the overflow from the ditch on the lower lands of the plaintiff. An extremely condensed summary of the claims of the defendant is contained in the opening brief and a stipulation between the parties is set forth in full. This
weston v. winooskipublic domain
Vermont Superior Court Filed 11/06 23 Chittenden nit VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT £9 £1. CIVIL DIVISION Chittenden Unit
Dorman v. Norton Co.public domain
Cowin, J. The plaintiff, Edgar W. Dorman, appeals from a judgment of dismissal of his complaint of age discrimination in employment, see G. L. c. 151B, § 4(1B), intentional interference with contractual relations, and employment termination in violation of public policy following the entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendants on each count.2 In a comprehensive opinion, a judge of the Superior
Lawson v. FMR LLCpublic domain
724 F.Supp.2d 141 (2010) Jackie Hosang LAWSON, Plaintiff, v. FMR LLC, dba Fidelity Investments; FMR Corp., dba Fidelity Investments; and Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC, dba Fidelity Investments, Defendants. Jonathan M. Zang, Plaintiff, v. Fidelity Management & Research Company, FMR Co., Inc., and FMR LLC f/k/a FMR Corp., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 08-10466-DPW, 08-10758-DPW. United
State v. Scottpublic domain
93 Wn.2d 7 (1980) 604 P.2d 943 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JOHNIE WILLIAM SCOTT, ET AL, Appellants. Nos. 45055, 45334. The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. January 3, 1980. As amended by order August 12, 1980. *9 W. Stephen Gregorich (appointed counsel for appeal),
Koike v. Board of Water Supplypublic domain
44 Haw. 100 (1960) 352 P.2d 835 EDNA S. KOIKE, SHOJI SEKIYA, YACHIYO BABA SEKIYA, JANYCE CHIYO MAEKAWA AND HELEN M. BABA v. BOARD OF WATER SUPPLY, CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU. No. 4081. Supreme Court of Hawaii. February 23, 1960. TSUKIYAMA, C.J., MARUMOTO, CASSIDY, WIRTZ AND LEWIS, JJ. Stanley Ling, Deputy City & County Atto