⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Melvin Hull”

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004-03-11 · Published · cited 27× · 362 F.3d 733; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 4647; 2004 WL 442688
*734 PER CURIAM: Appellant Melvin Junior Rainey appeals his 180-month sentence, imposed upon re-sentencing following his conviction for possession of a firearm or ammunition by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(e). Rainey appeals
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999-09-07 · Published · cited 39× · 187 F.3d 1316; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 21334; 1999 WL 691572
HOWARD, Senior District Judge: Kenneth Melvin was charged by information and pleaded guilty to trafficking in fraudulently obtained credit card accounts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(A)(2), possession of fifteen or more unauthorized credit card accounts with the intent to defraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(A)(3), and social security fraud, in violation of 42 U.S.C.
In re Melvinpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1994-12-28 · Published · cited 0× · 186 B.R. 276; 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 2280; 1994 WL 842854
MEMORANDUM OPINION ARTHUR B. BRISKMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came before the Court on the Debtors’ Objection to Proofs of Claim filed by Luis R. Gutierrez (“Gutierrez”). After reviewing the pleadings, evidence, receiving testimony, exhibits, arguments of counsel, and authorities for their respective positions, the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989-12-06 · Published · cited 0× · 99 Or. App. 529; 783 P.2d 38
RICHARDSON, P. J. Defendants appeal from the judgment in this action arising out of their sale of a mobile Pickwick Potatoe Oven to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs pleaded five claims, all of which centered on defendants’ alleged misrepresentation that necessary licenses from the state Health Division and the City of Portland were obtainable. The trial court entered a judgment in plaintiffs’ favor on their negligent misrepresentation c
Melvin v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988-02-24 · Published · cited 0× · 751 P.2d 195; 1988 OK CR 30; 1988 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 39; 1988 WL 21463
OPINION BUSSEY, Judge: The appellant, Walter Lee Melvin, was tried and convicted in a nonjury trial in the District Court of Grady County of the crime of Robbery with a Firearm After Former Conviction of Three Felonies in Case No. CRF-84-111 and was sentenced to thirty (30) years imprisonment, and he appeals. On August 21, 1984, the appellant barged into a hotel room at the Best Wester
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001-07-20 · Published · cited 0× · 63 S.W.3d 384; 2001 Tenn. App. LEXIS 513
OPINION FRANKS, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which SUSANO, and SWINEY, JJ„ joined. Contractor sought recovery from subcontractor’s insurance carrier for moneys paid to a third party who had sued contractor and subcontractor in tort. The Trial Court ordered recovery under the policy. Insur
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2023-04-18 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Humphreys, Beales, Huff, O’Brien, AtLee, Malveaux, PUBLISHED Athey, Fulton, Ortiz, Causey, Friedman, Chaney, Raphael, Lorish, Callins and White Argued at Richmond, Virginia MICHAEL MELVIN FARY OPINION BY v. Record No. 1079-21-2
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015-10-22 · Published · cited 131× · 804 F.3d 707; 2015 WL 6437436
JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, Circuit Judge: Melvin Jones and Celadon Trucking Services appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for new trial. They argue that the district court erred by admitting evidence of Jaime Guzman’s medical expenses and refusing to provide an adverse jury instruction in their favor based on spoliation o
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003-03-04 · Published · cited 377× · 323 F.3d 872; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3857; 2003 WL 722756
HULL, Circuit Judge: Defendant Michael Kesler, a state trooper, appeals the denial of immunity on plaintiffs § 1983 claims and state law claims. We reverse because defendant Kesler was entitled to qualified immunity on the § 1983 claims and' discretionary-function immunity on the state law claims. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND A. Traffic
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2010-12-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED MARCH SESSION , 1997 November 4, 1997 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk MELVIN LEE BURKETT, ) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9605-CC-00202 ) Appe llant, ) )
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976-04-14 · Published · cited 0× · 331 So. 2d 348; 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14156
MELVIN, WOODROW M., Sr., Associate Judge. The parties will be designated as they were in the trial court. The plaintiff lost the battle of the surveyors. The key issues before the court were plaintiff’s alleged acquisition of title by adverse possession and whether a fence constituted a boundary by acquiescence between plaintiff’s property, in Section 31, and defendant’s property in Section 32, Township 1
Hull v. Calvertpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971-06-09 · Published · cited 0× · 469 S.W.2d 277; 1971 Tex. App. LEXIS 2767
Suit was brought in the District Court by H. Winston Hull and others1 against Robert S. Calvert, Comptroller of Public Accounts of Texas. Plaintiffs-Appellants are taxpayers who own real property in Ector County and who pay taxes to the State of Texas. Appellants sought to enjoin Appellee Comptroller from disbursing funds for the planning and operation of the University of Texas at the Permian Basin upon a site purportedly acqu
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979-03-23 · Published · cited 0× · 368 So. 2d 677; 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14389
McCORD, Chief Judge. This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the trial court denying a motion to dismiss appellee’s second amended complaint. By his motion to dismiss, he contended that he is residing outside the State of Florida and has been continuously residing in Alameda, California; that appellee failed to allege sufficient jurisdictional facts to bring appellant within the jurisdiction of the Florida courts.</
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013-02-13 · Published · cited 3× · 711 F.3d 1263; 2013 WL 828001; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 5942
ORDER Melvin Perez, a Florida prisoner proceeding pro se, has moved for a certifícate of appealability (“COA”) and leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Perez seeks to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus and the denial of his motion to alter or amend judgment: a motion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). Perez’s section 2254 petition challenged a s
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999-11-29 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE OCTOBER 1999 SESSION FILED November 29, 1999 MELVIN DARRELL SAWYER, ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. ) Appellate Court Clerk NO. 01C01-9811-CR-00440 Appellant,
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) · 2006-02-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998-09-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED AUGUST 1998 SESSION September 18, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9705-CC-00167 Appelle
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998-12-10 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED OCTOBER 1998 SESSION December 10, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson RICKY EARL MELVIN, ) Appellate Court Clerk ) NO. 01C01-9707-CR-00264 Appella
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017-04-27 · Published · cited 1× · 686 F. App'x 823
PER CURIAM: David L. Roberts, appointed counsel for Ralph Johnson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent exam
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999-09-07 · Published · cited 41× · 187 F.3d 1316
PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT -------------------- 09/07/99