⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Meriweather v. Hall”

Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989-06-14 · Published · cited 3× · 775 P.2d 340; 97 Or. App. 212; 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 729
775 P.2d 340 (1989) 97 Or.App. 212 Thomas Nicholas MERIWEATHER, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent. A44925. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted on remand April 27, 1989. Decided June 14, 1989. Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, and Lawrence J. Hall, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, for petitioner. Dave Frohnmaye
Oregon Supreme Court · 1989-03-14 · Published · cited 3× · 770 P.2d 593; 307 Or. 509; 1989 Ore. LEXIS 111
770 P.2d 593 (1989) 307 Or. 509 Thomas Nicholas MERIWEATHER, Petitioner On Review, v. State BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent On Review. CA A44925; SC S35548. Supreme Court of Oregon. Decided March 14, 1989. Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender of Oregon, Salem, and Lawrence J. Hall, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, for petitioner on review. Dave
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988-08-24 · Published · cited 0× · 92 Or. App. 705; 759 P.2d 1141; 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 1481
PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole setting a “parole consideration date.” See ORS 144.228. He asserts that we have jurisdiction pursuant to ORS 144.335.1 We do not. ORS 144.335 grants this court jurisdiction only over orders of the Board that fix a parole release date, revoke parole, or discharge a person from parole. Addic
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989-11-08 · Published · cited 0× · 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 1749; 99 Or. App. 373; 781 P.2d 1271
PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of an order setting his parole consideration date. ORS 144.228. He had sought review of an earlier order, and we reversed and remanded, because the Board of Parole might have applied the wrong rule. Meriweather v. Board of Parole, 97 Or App 212, 775 P2d 340 (1989). The order now under review was issued by the Board before our decision in the earlier case. It uses the same parole cons
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001-02-07 · Published · cited 1× · 793 So. 2d 986; 2001 WL 98595
793 So.2d 986 (2001) Ernest MERIWEATHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D00-108. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. February 7, 2001. *987 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Robert A. Butterworth,
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920-11-20 · Published · cited 0× · 192 P. 433; 18 Okla. Crim. 710; 1920 OK CR 215; 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 171
This appeal is from a judgment rendered on a *Page 711 verdict of a jury finding the defendant guilty of shooting another with intent to do bodily harm, and fixing his punishment at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of four months. The information in substance charges that in Oklahoma county, on the 6th day of September. 1918, defendant, Walter M. Meriweather, did shoot one Arthur Wallace with a shotgun with Intent to do great bodily harm. The
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2025-06-20 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims CHEREE NEWSON-PACE, Plaintiff, No. 23-cv-0226 v. (Filed: June 20, 2025) THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Charles Ryan Morgan, Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff. Ioana C. Meyer, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Wash
Coleman v. Saulpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-02-27 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEQUESHA C., 1 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 20-cv-3581-RMM KILOLO KIJAKAZI, 2 Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Lequesha C. brought this action under a provision of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of th
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-05-20 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEPHANIE G., 1 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 22-cv-00904-RMM MARTIN O’MALLEY, 2 Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Stephanie G. brought this action under a provision of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of t
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-01-15 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal Case No. 22-221 (RJL) ) BENJAMIN GRABINSKI, ) ) Defendant. )
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-01-12 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Vv. SHAWNDALE CHILCOAT and DONALD CHILCOAT, Defendants. Criminal Action No. 22-299 (CKK) MEMORANDUM OPINION (January 12, 2024) Pending before the Court are Defendant Donald Chilcoat’s [81] Motion for Release from Custody and Defendant Shawndale Chilcoat’s [83] Motion for Release from Custody. The two defendants are currently detained at the District of Columbia Jail following violations of their conditions o
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-01-10 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SHAWNDALE CHILCOAT Criminal Action No. 22-299 (CKK) and DONALD CHILCOAT, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (January 10, 2023) For their actions as members of the riot at the United States Capitol on J
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-01-18 · Published · cited 0× · 234 F. Supp. 3d 255; 2017 WL 211128; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6415
MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Carl Oglesby filed suit in 1987 challenging several agencies’ responses to a Freedom-o:f Information Act (“FOIA”) request Mr. Oglesby submitted in August 1985. It is now- 2017. Over the past twenty years, this case has gone through numerous rounds of summary judgment briefing and reach
District Court, District of Columbia · 2016-03-17 · Published · cited 22× · 170 F. Supp. 3d 147; 2016 WL 1069646; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34341
MEMORANDUM OPINION CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge Plaintiff Ryan Shapiro brought this action against four federal agencies pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. He alleges that each defendant has violated FOIA by inadequately processing his request for all documents in their possession that mention the
Bullock v. Saulpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL BULLOCK, Plaintiff, v. No. 20-cv-1764-ZMF KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Paul Bullock (“Mr. Bullock”) moves for reversal of Defendant Commissioner of the Social Se
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016-03-02 · Published · cited 17× · 2016 Ark. App. 131; 485 S.W.3d 275; 2016 Ark. App. LEXIS 151
RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge h Caroline Adams appeals from the March 6, 2015 order of the Washington County Circuit Court terminating her parental rights to her two-year-old daughter, E.F. 1 This case reache's us for the second time on appeal after we ordered rebriefing, specifically directing Adam
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-03-16 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 21-52-1 (TJK) DOMINIC PEZZOLA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION On January 6, 2021, Defendant Dominic Pezzola, a member of the Proud Boys, was the tip of a spear that pierced the United States Capitol. The government has pro
Hughes v. Hughespublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 2013-07-02 · Published · cited 5× · 2013 MT 176; 370 Mont. 499; 305 P.3d 772; 81 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1; 2013 WL 3324395; 2013 Mont. LEXIS 219
JUSTICE MORRIS delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 The District Court for the Tenth Judicial District, Fergus County, consolidated multiple complaints. The dispute arose between Johnny Hughes (Johnny) and his parents, Jack and Shirley Hughes (Jack and Shirley), regarding borrowed money, the partition of joint
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 11, 2013 Session JAMES G. AKERS v. SESSIONS PAVING COMPANY ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hickman County No. 11-CV-4530 Robbie T. Beal, Chancellor No. M2012-02602-COA-R3-CV - Filed August 13, 2013 This action arises out of the alleged breach of a construction subcontract due to the g
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015-12-30 · Published · cited 1× · 49 N.E.3d 162; 2015 WL 9586984; 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 775
NAJAM, Judge. Statement of the Case [1] Charles- S. Whitham appeals his convictions for attempted-murder, a Class A felony (Count I); aggravated battery, a Class B felony (Count II); .criminal confinement, as a Class B felony (Count V); two counts of battery, each as a Class. C felony (Counts III and IV); and strangulation, a Class D felony (Count VI). W