Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Merrell v. O'Malley”
O'Malley v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ********************* K.O., parent of * No. 13-472V A.F., a minor, * Special Master Christian J. Moran Petitioner, * * Filed: July 7, 2016 v. * Reissued: January 3, 2017 * SECRETARY OF HEALT
Stephen V. Kolbe v. Martin J. O'Malleypublic domain
AMENDED MEMORANDUM CATHERINE C. BLAKE, District Judge. On May 16, 2013, in the wake of a number of mass shootings, the most recent of which claimed the lives of twenty children and six adult staff members at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut, the Governor of Maryland signed into law the Firearm Safety Act of 2013. The Act bans cert
Stephen V. Kolbe v. Martin J. O'Malleypublic domain
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND * STEPHEN V. KOLBE, et al. * * * v. * Civil No. CCB-13-2841
Marsingill v. O'MALLEYpublic domain
128 P.3d 151 (2006) Vicki MARSINGILL, Appellant, v. James O'MALLEY, M.D., Appellee. No. S-11578. Supreme Court of Alaska. January 27, 2006. *153 Robert H. Wagstaff, Law Offices of Robert H. Wagstaff, Anchorage, and Richard H. Friedman, Friedman Rubin & White, Anchorage, for Appellant. Howard A. Lazar and Donna M. Meyer
Schumacher v. O'Malleypublic domain
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.
Schumacher v. O'Malleypublic domain
Motion for stay granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Dowling, Laughlin, Smith, Merrell and Greenbaum, JJ.
Sol Frankel, Inc. v. O'Malleypublic domain
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Merrell and McAvoy, JJ.
Dorato-Cerutti Corp. v. O'Malleypublic domain
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Page, Merrell and Finch, JJ.; Finch and Merrell, JJ., dissenting.
Judgment appealed from by the plaintiff John O’Malley, an infant, by his guardian ad litem, John Sterzer, reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to said appellant to abide the event, upon the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence, the action severed, and the judgment appealed from by the plaintiff William Sterzer affirmed, with costs to the respondent against said appellant. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, To
State v. Tolbertpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Tolbert, 2025-Ohio-4469.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 114748 v. : QEYEON TOLBERT,
United States v. Carl Frederickspublic domain
HILL, Circuit Judge: A jury convicted Carl Fredericks of conspiracy to import marijuana and importation of marijuana. Fredericks filed this direct appeal, maintaining that the evidence presented by the government was insufficient to convict him, and that the district court erred in admitting the statements of several persons alleged to have conspired with him.
Eplus, Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc.public domain
PROST, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal and a cross-appeal arising from an infringement suit brought by ePlus, Inc. against Lawson Software, Inc. (“Lawson”), in which a jury found that Lawson infringes ePlus’s method and system claims. Lawson appeals, arguing that the system claims are indefinite and that the evidence of infringement of the method claims does not support the jur
State v. Sopkopublic domain
[Cite as State v. Sopko, 2025-Ohio-3280.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 114604 v. : STEVEN SOPKO, JR., :
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.public domain
PROST, Circuit Judge. In these consolidated appeals, Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung”) challenge orders of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California denying requests to seal various confidential exhibits attached to pre-trial and post-tr
State v. Johnsonpublic domain
MARY EILEEN KILBANE, P.J.: {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Zachary Johnson ("Johnson"), appeals his convictions for aggravated murder, murder, attempted murder, felonious assault, discharging a firearm at or near a prohibited premises, and having a weapon while under disability. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. {¶ 2} In August 2016, Johnson was charged in a
Hrivnak v. NCO Portfolio Management, Inc.public domain
723 F.Supp.2d 1020 (2010) Christopher G. HRIVNAK, Plaintiff, v. NCO PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:10-CV-646. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. July 19, 2010. Anand N. Misra, Beachwood, OH, Robert S. Belovich, Parma, OH, for Plaintiff. *1021 Allison L. Cannizaro, Brian D
Whitserve, LLC v. Computer Packages, Inc.public domain
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge O’MALLEY. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MAYER. O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. This patent case, presenting myriad issues, includes an appeal from a jury’s finding of willful infringement of four patents, a cross-appeal of the trial court’s denial of various post-trial motions, and a separate cross-appeal of a denial of sanctions and attorn
Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Systems, Inc.public domain
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. Ericsson, Inc. & Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (collectively, “Ericsson”) brought suit against D-Link Systems, Inc.; Netgear, Inc.; Acer, Inc.; Acer America Corp.; Gateway, Inc.; Dell, Inc.; Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.; and Toshiba Corp., with Intel Corp. intervening (collectively, “D-Link”), in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, allegin
Marctec, LLC v. Johnson & Johnsonpublic domain
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. In this patent case, MarcTec, LLC (“MarcTec”) filed suit in the Southern District of Illinois against Cordis Corporation and Johnson & Johnson (collectively, “Cor-dis”) 1 alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,128,753 (“the '753 Patent”) and 7,217,290 (“the '290 Patent”) (collectively, “t
Jackson County, Missouri v. Jerry Hardy Stampspublic domain
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, ) ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) WD87106 ) JERRY HARDY STAMPS, ) Opinion filed: February 25, 2025 ) Appellant.