Cases

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Greene County) to review two determinations of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. During a medication run, a facility nurse suspected that petitioner did not swallow his medication and was hoarding it instead. When confronted, petitioner became uncooperative and abusive, yellin

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Greene County) to review two determinations of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. During a medication run, a facility nurse suspected that petitioner did not swallow his medication and was hoarding it instead. When confronted, petitioner became uncooperative and abusive, yellin

RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ’ Alvin W. Thompson, United States District Judge The pro se plaintiff brings this action seeking damages and seeking to void, vacate, and set aside a foreclosure judgment rendered in Connecticut Superior Court and to be granted free and clear title to the property that was the subject of the foreclosure proceeding. De

DECISION AND ORDER DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge. This action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 arises out of an incident that occurred in June 2007, in which plaintiff Holly A. Man-ville was arrested following a traffic stop by defendant Thomas Schamerhorn, a sergeant in the Greece (New York) Police Department (“GPD”). In the present posture of this case, plaintiff asserts a total of five claims again

This action has been pending in court since May of 1943. On June 6, 1946, at long last, the parties went to trial. In the hope of terminating a piece of litigation that has prevented the closing of the estate, the court will waste no time in the preparation and filing of the within memorandum. Brevity will be the pattern of this writing in so far as the circumstances of the case will permit. Upon the entire evidence the court is satisfied that in his deed of September 7, 1940, the plai

FITZGERALD, J. This action has been pending in court since May of 1943. On June 6, 1946, at long last, the parties went to trial. In the hope of terminating a piece of litigation that has prevented the closing of the estate, the court will waste no time in the preparation and filing of the within memorandum. Brevity will be the pattern of this writing in so far as the circumstances of the case will permit. Upon