Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mesa County Valley School District No. 51 v. S.”
470 F.Supp. 326 (1979) Stephanie OTERO, Brenda Otero (minors) suing by and through their father and next friend, Ray H. Otero, Wilford Trujillo, Jr., Sara Jane Trujillo (minors) suing by and through their father and next friend, Wilford Trujillo, Sr., Rebecca Trujillo, Rhoda Romero, Jeanette Romero (minors) suing by and through their mother and next friend, Dora Romero, William D. Gallegos (a minor) suing by and through his mother and next friend, Lena M
Mesa County Valley School District No. 51 v. Kelseypublic domain
8 P.3d 1200 (2000) MESA COUNTY VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 51, Petitioner, v. Rusti KELSEY, Respondent. No. 98SC825. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. September 11, 2000. *1202 Groves & Price, P.C., David A. Price, Grand Junction, Colorado, Attorney for Petitioner. Doehling & Driscoll, P.C., Gary L. Doehling, Jeff
Goletz v. Mesa County Valley School District No. 51public domain
[1] Leslie W. Goletz, petitioner, seeks review of the final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) ruling that he was not an employee covered by the Workers' Compensation Act, § 8-40-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1986 Repl. Vol. 3B). He contends that his services as an unpaid volunteer assistant baseball coach for the respondent school district made him an employee under § 8-41-106(1)(a)(I)(A), C.R.S. (1986 Repl. Vol. 3B) (now codified as §
Mesa County Valley School District No. 51 v. Goletzpublic domain
821 P.2d 785 (1991) MESA COUNTY VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 51 and Transportation Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Leslie W. GOLETZ, Respondent. No. 91SC314. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. December 9, 1991. *786 Blackman & Levine, Lawrence D. Blackman, Barbara S. Henk, Denver, for petitioners. Elder & Phillip
Henderson v. Newport-Mesa Unified School Districtpublic domain
*484Opinion RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J. Gloria Cheung Henderson appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained a demurrer to her complaint without leave to amend. Henderson, a teacher, sued Newport-Mesa Unified School District and its governing board (the District), alleging claims for damages based on (1) the District’s failur
Maccagnan v. Cherry Creek School District No. 5public domain
Appellate Case: 25-1335 Document: 53-1 Date Filed: 07/17/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 17, 2026
Otero v. Mesa County Valley School District No. 51public domain
408 F.Supp. 162 (1975) Stephanie OTERO et al., Plaintiffs, v. MESA COUNTY VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 51 et al., Defendants. No. 74-W-279. United States District Court, D. Colorado. December 30, 1975. *163 Vilma S. Martinez and Sanford J. Rosen, Mexican-American Legal Defense Fund, San Francisco, Cal., Paul A. Baca and Federico F.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Robert D. Mariani, United States District Judge Before the Court are the cross-motions for summary judgment of the Defendants, Board of School Directors of the Panther Valley School District, and Plaintiff, John Barna (Docs. 49, 77). For the reasons that follow, the Court finds that the permanent ban imposed by Defendants upon Barna prohibiting him from attending public school board meeti
Long v. Fulton County School Districtpublic domain
807 F.Supp.2d 1274 (2011) Marlene Thompson LONG, Vincent Long, and Christina Long, Plaintiffs, v. FULTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-3033-TCB. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. August 4, 2011. *1277 Rory K. Starkey, The Starkey Law Firm, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs.
Arthur v. Bloomfield School Districtpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Bloomfield School District and- Defendant Bloomfield School District Board of Education’s (collectively, the “Governmental Defendants”) Motion and Memorandum for Summary Judgment [Doc. 101] and Defendant Rob Ford’s Motion and Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment [Doc. 1
MESA COUNTY BD. OF COUNTY COM'RS v. Statepublic domain
203 P.3d 519 (2009) MESA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Main Street Café, Evan Gluckman, Donald Shonkwiler, John Bozek, Sharon Johnson, Rick Nevin, and all similarly situated Colorado taxpayers and registered voters, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE of Colorado; Bill Ritter, Jr., in his official capacity as the Governor of Colorado; and Colorado Department of Education, Defendants-Appellants. No. 08SA216.
The Ohio House, LLC v. City of Costa Mesapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE OHIO HOUSE, LLC, No.22-56181 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:19-cv-01710- v. JVS-GJS CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation, ORDER AND AMENDED Defendant-Appellee, OPINION and BR
Reynolds v. School District No. 1public domain
EBEL, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Bernadette Reynolds (“Reynolds”) brought this reverse discrimination action against Denver Public School District No. 1, the Board of Education, and three school administrators (collectively “Defendants”) under various federal civil rights statutes and Colorado law. Reynolds, a white bilingual education teacher in the Denver Public School system, claims that Defendants discriminated
Reynolds v. School District No. 1public domain
69 F.3d 1523 67 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,828, 104 Ed. Law Rep. 1004 Bernadette REYNOLDS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, DENVER, COLORADO, named as: SchoolDistrict No. 1, City and County of Denver; School DistrictNo. 1, Board of Education, named as: Board of Education ofSchool District No. 1, City and County of Denver; JoThomas, Lino Gonzales, Leroy Lopez, Defendants-Appellees.
McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. This action was brought by nine Mexican-American school children against the Mesa County Valley School District No. 51, pursuant to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq. The claim was that the School District had discriminated against its Mexican-American students in connection with the curriculum offered the students and
393 F.3d 1158 ZUNI PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 89; Gallup-Mckinley County Public School District No. 1, Petitioners,v.UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Respondent.New Mexico State Department of Education, Intervenor. No. 01-9541. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. December 30, 2004. Ronald J. V
Area 51 Productions v. City of Alamedapublic domain
Filed 2/20/18; On rehearing CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR AREA 51 PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, A144645 v. CITY OF ALAMEDA et al., (Alameda County Sup
The Ohio House, LLC v. City of Costa Mesapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THE OHIO HOUSE, LLC, No. 22-56181 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:19-cv-0171f0- v. JVS-GJS CITY OF COSTA MESA, a municipal corporation, OPINION Defendant-Appellee, and BRANDON STUMP, an individual; RYAN STUMP, an individual; KEITH
Edwards v. Lake Elsinore Unified School Districtpublic domain
Opinion CODRINGTON, J. I INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Lori Edwards (Edwards) appeals from the trial court’s ruling denying her petition for writ of mandate, challenging Edwards’s classification and payment as a substitute teacher for the 2007-2008 school year.
15 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1804, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7901 Stephanie Otero v. Mesa County Valley School District No. 51public domain
McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs-appellants are nine Mexican-American school children who attend, or at one time did attend, public schools located in the Mesa County Valley School District No. 51. The defendants-appellees are District No. 51, the members of its Board of Education, and numerous school officials in both their individual and official capacities.