Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Metered Appliances Inc.”
Metered Appliances, Inc. v. 250 Tenants' Corp.public domain
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a license agreement, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated June 17, 1999, which denied its motion for summary judgment and granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. In 1981 the parties entered into a written ag
Metered Appliances, Inc. v. 75 Owners Corp.public domain
Defendant’s predecessor entered into a lease in 1989 with the third-party defendant, a corporation previously dissolved by the Secretary of State pursuant to Tax Law § 203-a for failure to pay franchise tax. While a corporate dissolution may not affect the corporation’s right to carry on business for the purpose of winding up its affairs (see, Bowditch v 57 Laight St. Corp., 111 Misc 2d 255), new business is prohibited absent reinstatement by pay
Cloister E., Inc. v. New York State Liq. Auth.public domain
Cloister E., Inc. v New York State Liq. Auth. (2022 NY Slip Op 06187) Cloister E., Inc. v New York State Liq. Auth. 2022 NY Slip Op 06187 Decided on November 03, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Repo
Lebeau v. Saxon Mortg. Servs., Inc.public domain
JUDGE SANDRA CABRINA JENKINS This is an action for wrongful eviction brought by a mortgagor against his mortgage lender and loan servicer. Kelvin Lebeau appeals the trial court's October 12, 2017 judgment granting the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Deutsche Bank and Trust Company Americas ("Deutsche Bank") and Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. ("Saxon") (collectively, "Appellees"). Based on our review of the record, we
Lebeau v. Saxon Mortg. Servs., Inc.public domain
JUDGE SANDRA CABRINA JENKINS This is an action for wrongful eviction brought by a mortgagor against his mortgage lender and loan servicer. Kelvin Lebeau appeals the trial court's October 12, 2017 judgment granting the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Deutsche Bank and Trust Company Americas ("Deutsche Bank") and Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. ("Saxon") (collectively, "Appellees"). Based on our review of the record, we
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 6, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-1807 Lower Tribunal No. 14-283 ________________ First Equitable Realty III, Ltd., Appellant/Cross-Appelle
Pinewood Inc. fka PNI Incorporationpublic domain
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) Pinewood Inc. fka PNI Incorporation ) ASBCA Nos. 63588, 63686 ) Under Contract No. W912UM-22-C-0003 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Yong Eui Song, Esq. Central IP & Law
Wolf Appliance, Inc. v. Viking Range Corp.public domain
686 F.Supp.2d 878 (2010) WOLF APPLIANCE, INC., Plaintiff, v. VIKING RANGE CORP., Defendant. No. 09-cv-697-vis.[1] United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. February 11, 2010. *882 Jeffrey A. Simmons, Justin Edwin Gray, Stephan J. Nickels, Foley & Lardner LLP., Madison, WI, for Plaintiff. Anthony J. Sieve
HARPER, J. The plaintiffs, PMC Property Group, Inc. (PMC), and Energy Management Systems, Inc. (EMS), appeal from the trial court's judgment affirming in part the decision of the defendant Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (authority), 1 which found that the plaintiffs had engaged in the unauthorized
FILED MAY 5, 2020 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE EDWIN WELLS; ANN MINOR; and )
Kardos, J. v. Armstrong Pumps, Inc.public domain
J-A05006-19 2019 PA Super 324 JOYCE E. KARDOS, EXECUTRIX OF : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ESTATE OF NICHOLAS J. : PENNSYLVANIA KARDOS, DECEASED, AND JOYCE E. : KARDOS, IN HER OWN RIGHT : : Appellant : : v. : : A
Kardos, J. v. Armstrong Pumps, Inc.public domain
J-A05006-19 2019 PA Super 324 JOYCE E. KARDOS, EXECUTRIX OF : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ESTATE OF NICHOLAS J. : PENNSYLVANIA KARDOS, DECEASED, AND JOYCE E. : KARDOS, IN HER OWN RIGHT : : Appellant : : v. : : A
RICKESHIA-RAQUEL * NO. 2022-CA-0774 DEVALL * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * HOME FINDERS FOURTH CIRCUIT INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND * NATALIE W. GAMBLE STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* CONSOLIDATED WITH: C
Dorman v. State Industries, Inc.public domain
OPINION BY JUSTICE CLEO E. POWELL In this products liability action filed in 2011 and seeking over 24 million dollars in damages, Carolyn Dorman, Elizabeth Burgin, Nichole Howarth, and Kristin Julia (collectively "appellants") appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond ("trial court") finding State Industries, Inc. ("State") not liable for appellants'
Judgment rendered October 1, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 56,453-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** JOHN STEWART GENTRY
Wreal, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.public domain
USCA11 Case: 19-13285 Date Filed: 06/28/2022 Page: 1 of 46 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-13285 ____________________ WREAL, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Wreal, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.public domain
USCA11 Case: 19-13285 Date Filed: 06/28/2022 Page: 1 of 46 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-13285 ____________________ WREAL, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Troup v. Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Mark I. Partnow, J. Defendants move, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for an order granting summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint. Background On November 14, 2007, plaintiff Ray Troup was employed as a security guard by nonparty Eddington Security at a certain ongoing construction project at 255 E 74th Street in New York, New York. The project
POSNER, Circuit Judge, concurring. I agree with the decision to reverse the judgment of the district court and remand for a calculation of damages. But I think the majority opinion’s analysis could be simplified, and in addition I disagree with the majority’s discussion of damages for the breach of the second contract. This is a diversity suit that presents issues of Indiana contract law.
Solid Equities, Inc. v. City of Atlantapublic domain
710 S.E.2d 165 (2011) 308 Ga. App. 895 SOLID EQUITIES, INC. v. CITY OF ATLANTA. No. A10A1651. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 30, 2011. *166 Zachary & Segraves, Rick S. Sexton, Decatur, for appellant. Tamara Nikki Baines, Laura Sauriol, for appellee. PHIPPS, Presiding Judge. Sol