Cases

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITIONS IN AID OF EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT AND FOR SANCTIONS HON. MILTON I. SHADUR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter having come before this Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendants Mark Devor and Sheldon Chase’s Depositions in Aid- of Execution of Judgment and for Sanctions (“Motion”), and the Court having reviewed the record and Plain

FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANTS JUDGE MILTON I. SHADUR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff T-Mobile USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“T-Mobile”), for itself and its MetroPCS brand (collectively referred to hereinafter as “MetroPCS”) brought the above-captioned lawsuit against Defendants Mark Devor a/k/a Marcus W. Devor and Sheldon Chase a/k/a Chase Sheldon a/k/a Blu Chase (

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT METROPCS, INC., a Delaware  Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant- Cross-Appellee, Nos. 03-16759 v. 03-16760 THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN  D.C. No. FRANCISCO and THE BOARD OF CV-02-3442 PJH SUPERVISORS OF THE CITY OF SAN OPINION

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. This en banc court has split into two factions, neither of which resolves the issues of divided infringement. A scant majority of the court adopts a new theory of patent infringement, based on criminal law, whereby any entity that “advises, encourages, or otherwise induces,” maj. op. 1307, or “causes, urges, encourages, or aids the infringing conduct,” id. a

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) v. ) I.D. # 1505015619A ) 1505015619B ANTHONY ABBATIELLO, ) ) Defendant. ) Submitted: January 3, 2020

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KWESI HUDSON, § § No. 303, 2022 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. 1809009750(N) STATE OF DELAWARE, § §

OPINION AND ORDER HAGGERTY, District Judge: Plaintiff initiated this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of sex and to provide relief to a class of current and former employees of defendant. Specifically, plaintiff alleges that defendant subjected the class members to a sexually hostile

POSNER, Circuit Judge. One of the concerns that led up to the enactment of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq., was that zoning decisions by local governments were unreasonably retarding the growth of cellphone and other wireless services. Congress decided not to preempt local regulation entirely, but instead (so far as bears on this

629 F.Supp.2d 1148 (2009) Margo E. WALKER, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER, in his capacity as Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant. Civil No. 06-00408 LEK. United States District Court, D. Hawai'i. April 17, 2009. *1153 Clayton C. Ikei, Jerry P.S. Chang, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff. Harry Yee, Office o

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant ______________________ 2009-1372, 2009-1380, 2009-1416, 2009-1417 ______________________ Appeals from the Unite

Chapter 11 POST-TRIAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS THE PARTIES.. .261 PROCEDURAL HISTORY.. .262 FINDINGS OF FACT.. .265 I. The Parties and Certain Relevant Third Parties... 265 II. The LightSquared

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit May 23, 2014 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court