Cases

DISMSIS and Opinion Filed December 20, 2018 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01004-CV ARTEMIS SUN, INC., CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON AND MICHAEL CAOLO, JR., Appellants V. FALCON GREEN ENERGY, LLC, DAN VOGLER, DAVID M. COX AND DEWEY

GUIDRY, J. *1190Plaintiff, Ashanti Green, as tutrix of the minors, Dave Peterson, III and David Peterson, appeals from a judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of Allstate Insurance Company ("Allstate") and dismissing her claims against Allstate with prejudice. For the following reasons, we affirm. <

Peterson, Justice. *538**385Raymon Jamaal Green appeals his conviction for malice murder and other crimes, stemming from two different incidents occurring on May 9 and 21, 2010, the latter of which resulted in the death of Christopher Finney.

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-16-00165-CV _________________ MICHAEL DAVID BELLOW JR., Appellant V. LEEANN MCQUADE, Appellee _________________________________________________

HUGHES, J. | ]This writ presents the issue of whether a motorcycle accident victim, ostensibly insured under the provisions of the motorcycle co-owner’s uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM) automobile insurance policy, was entitled to UM coverage under the policy even though there was no coverage for the accident under the policy’s liability provisions. Finding the insurer failed to demonstrate a lack of UM coverage, we conclu

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Nat Trevor Levy sued Donald J. Ohl, William J. Knapp, L. David Green, and Merilyn Hamlett in Missouri state court, claiming malicious prosecution. After removal under diversity jurisdiction, defendants moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The district court 1 agreed. Levy appeals. Havi

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perry-Bey v. Lynch, No. 2:1

USCA11 Case: 23-12178 Document: 72-1 Date Filed: 05/08/2025 Page: 1 of 17 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-12178 ____________________ JEREMY JONES,

602 F.Supp.2d 244 (2009) Michael S. ESCOBEDO, Plaintiff, v. The Honorable Pete GREEN, Secretary of the Army, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-575 (RMC). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 19, 2009. *245 David Patrick Sheldon, Law Office of David P. Sheldon, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Lanny James Ac

870 N.E.2d 560 (2007) David Michael GREEN, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 45A05-0612-CR-708. Court of Appeals of Indiana. July 27, 2007. *563 Marce Gonzalez, Jr., Merrillville, IN, Samuel L. Cappas, Highland, IN, Attorneys for Appellant. Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Matthew

STROUD, Judge. Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of defendants.1 Because defendants are immune from liability under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-21.14, we affirm. I. Background This is the second appeal before this Court arising out of the treatment of Mr. Larry Green following his accident on 24 January 2005. See Green v. K

RILEY, Chief Judge. These appeals are driven, in large part, by the standards of review. About five years ago Michael Bavlsik was- driving his 2003 GMC Savana van when he collided with a boat being towed by another vehicle. Bavlsik was wearing his seatbelt, but that did not prevent him from hitting his head on the roof when the van rolled over. As. a res

EASTEBROOK, Circuit Judge. Between 2006 and 2012 Packerland Whey Products, Inc., deceived at least one of its customers about the protein content of a product called Whey Protein. Concentrate. Whey, the watery part of milk that remains after the removal of curds, is rich in protein. Removing whey’s nonprotein components generates a concentrate that can be used in other products. L

Justice HECHT announced the decision of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which Justice GREEN, Justice GUZMAN, and Justice DEVINE joined. The Tim Cole Act1 entitles a person who has been wrongfully imprisoned to compensation from the State, but payments terminate “if, after the date the person becomes eligible for compensation ..., the person is co

279 S.W.3d 226 (2009) David and Sherri MCCRACKEN, Respondents, v. GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC., Appellant. No. WD 68957. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. March 3, 2009. David G. Wasinger, Michael K. Daming, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. *227 James P. Barton, Jr., Marshall, MO, for respondents. Before SMART

PER CURIAM. In Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 2460, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012), the Supreme Court held that “man *282 datory life without parole for those under the age of 18 at the time of their crimes violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on ‘cruel and unusual p

DAVIS, Justice: This matter involves two consolidated petitions for writs of prohibition filed under the original jurisdiction of this Court. The petition filed in Case No. 13-0086 was brought by the defendants in seven consolidated eases pending before the Circuit Court of Mason County; 1 and the petition in Case No. 1

ERVIN, Judge. Plaintiffs Larry Donnell Green, through his guardian ad Litem Sharon Crudup; Larry Alston; and Ruby Kelly appeal from an order granting a motion for costs filed by Defendants Wade R. Kearney, II; Pamela Ball Hayes; Ronnie Wood; and Louisburg Rescue and *283Emergency Services, Inc. On appeal, Plaintiffs contend that the trial court erroneously gr

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0046p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DAVID REEDY, │ Plaintiff-Appellant

SHAW, Justice (concurring specially). I concur in the main opinion. I write separately only to make several observations. The PACT program was created with laudable intentions and apparently operated effectively for a number of years; however, as demonstrated by the facts set out in the main opinion, it now stands as a cautionary tale with respect to the creation of government programs