Cases

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA PAUL E. KNIGHT, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D14-985 TIMOTHY H. CANNON, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AND R. COMERFORD, WARDEN

b. Breach of contract Under Virginia law, "[t]he elements of a breach of contract action are (1) a legally enforceable obligation of a defendant to a plaintiff; (2) the defendant's violation or breach of that obligation; and (3) injury or damage to the plaintiff caused by the breach of obligation."9 Ramos v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA ,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: ECF No. 47 JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge In this legal malpractice action, Plaintiff William E. Knight moves for partial sum*993mary judgment against Defendant Diane Aqui on the question of liability pertaining to each of Knight’s causes of action for profes

801 A.2d 967 (2002) HILDRETH CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.C., & Colonia Insurance Company, Appellants, v. LARRY E. KNIGHT, INC., Appellee. No. 01-CV-23. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued April 24, 2002. Decided June 27, 2002. *968 Robert C. Kostecka, Bethesda, MD, for appellants. Andrew N. Cook,

Judge SULLIVAN delivered the opinion of the Court. During February of 1997, appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer members at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware. In accordance with his pleas, he was found guilty of assaulting his wife, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 928. Contrary to his pleas,

661 F.Supp.2d 1206 (2009) Charles E. KNIGHT, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-cv-02498-CMA. United States District Court, D. Colorado. October 5, 2009. *1209 Alan M. Agee, Alan M. Agee, P.C., Colorado Springs, CO, William Thomas Dawson, William T. Dawson, LLC, Denver

ORDER R. BROOKE JACKSON, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Final Judgment Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 58 [ECF No. 76] and Defendant Knight Transportation, Inc.’s Motion for New Trial Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 59 or in the Alternative Remitti-tur [ECF No. 79]. The Court addresses each motion in turn. BACKGROUND This

ROBERT C. CHAMBERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In a Memorandum Opinion and Order issued on May 31, 2018, this Court dispensed with a majority of the pending motions in this matter, including the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment and related motions in limine. Mem. Op. and Order , ECF No. 118. However, five motions still remain unresolved: (1) Defendant's Omnibus Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Plaintiff's Gene

ROBERT C. CHAMBERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *814Pending before the Court are a litany of motions, including Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 42) and Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 44). Importantly, four of Defendant's other still-pending motions are relevant to its summary judgment motion: Motion t

Angela S. Knight and Roy M. Knight were divorced in 1995. They had two children. They had made an agreement, *Page 508 which the court incorporated into its judgment, providing that the parties would have joint legal custody of the children and that the mother would have physical custody of one child and the father would have physical custody of the other child. In 1998, the mother sought sole legal custody of the children and physical cust

536 F.Supp.2d 1012 (2008) Dr. Ronnie JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. Charles D. KNIGHT, Individually and as Superintendent of Schools of the Watson Chapel, Arkansas School District No. 24, a Public Body Corporate; and the Board of Education of the Watson Chapel, Arkansas School District No. 24, A Public Body Corporate; Defendants. No. 5:06CV00072 SWW. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Divi

659 S.E.2d 742 (2008) Andre D. KNIGHT, Plaintiff/Appellant v. Roosevelt HIGGS, Gladys Shelton, In her Individual Capacity and Official Capacity as a Member/Chairperson of the Board of Elections, Betty Lewis, In her Individual Capacity and her Official Capacity as a Member of the Edgecombe County Board of Elections, Samuel Branch, In his Individual Capacity and Official Capacity as a Member of the Edgecombe County Board of Elections, and the Edgec

267 P.3d 973 (2011) 173 Wn.2d 325 JZ KNIGHT, Petitioner, v. CITY OF YELM; Windshadow, LLC; Elaine C. Horsak; Windshadow II Townhomes, LLC; Richard E. Slaughter; Regent Mahan, LLC; Jack Long; Petra Engineering, LLC; Samantha Meadows, LLC; TTPH 3-8, LLC, Respondents. No. 84831-9. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued May 26, 2011. D

Judgment PER CURIAM. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

2013 WI 57 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2010AP3158 COMPLETE TITLE: Park Bank, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Roger E. Westburg and Sandra L. Westburg, Defendants-Appellants-Petitioners. REVIE

523 F.Supp.2d 444 (2007) WESTPORT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. HANFT & KNIGHT, P.C., et al., Defendants. No. 4:07-CV-0516. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. December 10, 2007. *445 *446 Charles E. Haddick, Jr., Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C., Camp Hill, PA, Mic

WELLS, Chief Judge. Affirmed. See Levin v. Middlebrooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, P.A. v. *1122U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So.2d 606, 608 (Fla.1994).

571 S.E.2d 397 (2002) 257 Ga. App. 470 KNIGHT v. The STATE. McGuffin v. The State. Nos. A02A1044, A02A1045. Court of Appeals of Georgia. August 29, 2002. Reconsideration Dismissed September 19, 2002. Certiorari Denied January 13, 2003. Lloyd J. Matthews, for appellant (case no. A02A1044). M

HULL, Circuit Judge: In this Medicaid fraud case, defendants Todd Farha, Paul Behrens, William Kale, and Peter Clay appeal their convictions on multiple grounds, including insufficient evidence, evidentiary errors, and improper jury instructions. At the time of the fraud, the defendants were all high-level executives of WellCare Health Plans, Inc. (‘WellCare”) or one of its two

OPINION PER CURIAM This appeal arises from the dismissal of Appellant Curtis Knight’s complaint as a sanction for failure to prosecute. He also appeals from the dismissal of his malicious prosecution claims against Defendants Tate, Menz, Contreras, Murray, Taylor, Margolis, and Minor. For the reasons that follow, we will reverse the District Court’s dismissal of Knight’s complaint for failure to prosecute