Cases

Per Curiam. *735This disciplinary matter is before the court for a second time. See In the Matter of Davis , 303 Ga. 564, 814 S.E.2d 383<

HILL, Justice. [¶1] A jury convicted James Rogers of first-degree sexual assault and two counts of third-degree sexual abuse of a minor. Mr. Rogers qualified as a habitual criminal and was thus sentenced to life in prison on the first-degree sexual assault conviction. He received thirteen- to fifteen-year sentences on the remaining two charges to be served concurrently to each oth

DAVIS, Justice. [¶1] Appellant Edward Barrowes challenges his conviction of aggravated vehicular homicide as defined by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-106(b)(ii) (LexisNexis 2015). He claims the evidence presented by the State was insufficient to establish that he drove in a reckless manner. We affirm. ISSUES [¶2] Was the evidence suf

MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge. | ¡¿Defendant, Michael Davis, appeals his conviction and sentence for second degree murder, claiming the evidence was insufficient to establish his identity as the perpetrator of the offense and claiming various trial court errors. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. On February 25, 2013, Defendant was indicted and charged with the second degree murder of Reginal Anthony in vio

ORDER PER CURIAM. Michael' Davis (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury found him guilty of felony possession of a controlled substance, misdemeanor possession of marijuana, and misdemeanor possession of drug paraphernalia. Defendant claims the trial court: (1) plainly erred by allowing the prosecutor to state in closing argum

OPINION AND ORDER John G. Koeltl, District Judge: The plaintiff, Evan A. Davis, brings this action for declaratory and injunctive relief against the defendant's, the Commissioners of the New York State and New York City Boards of Election in their official capacities. Davis alleges that §§ 6-138, 6-140, 6-146, and 7-104 of the New York Election Law (the “Candidate Laws”) are unconstitutional under the Fir

McGEE, Judge. Jevon Arvin Davis (“Defendant”) was indicted for food stamp fraud, medical assistance recipient fraud, public assistance fraud, common law forgery, and common law uttering. Nannetta Davis (“Ms. Davis”), Defendant’s wife, worked for the Alamance County Department of Social Services (“DSS”). Ms. Davis pleaded guilty, in a separate case, to “three fraud charges, the medical recipient fraud, the food stamp fraud[,] a

ERIC F. MELGREN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on the Trustee Carl B. Davis's appeal of the bankruptcy court's denial of the Trustee's motion to dismiss. The Trustee argues that the bankruptcy court erred when it found that language in 11 U.S.C. § 1328(a) required it to discharge

642 F.Supp.2d 573 (2009) Gaillee BURRIS, # 22091, Plaintiff v. Christian DAVIS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:06cv233-MTP. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Hattiesburg Division. June 3, 2009. *576 Gaillee Burris, Cleveland, MS, pro se. Jason Edward Dare, J. Lawson Hester, Page, Kruger & Holland,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2259 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL A. DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Opinion and Order LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, United States District Judge. Defendants Tyrone Davis (“Davis”), Damon Chappelle (“Chappelle”), Jamil Speller (“Speller”), and Charles Bonner (“Bonner” and together, “Defendants”) seek the dismissal of the above-captioned indictment against them on account of alleged “outrageous government conduct.” Alternatively, Defendants move to compel the Government to pr

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ralph D. Davis appeals the district court’s order denying his motions seeking to obtain copies of Title III orders * relevant to his criminal conviction, and for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ralph D. Davis appeals the district court’s order denying his motions seeking to obtain copies of Title III orders * relevant to his criminal conviction, and for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1081 MICHAEL EDWARD TANKERSLEY, Plaintiff − Appellant, v. JAMES W. ALMAND, in his official capacity as Trustee of the Client Protection Fund; DOUGLAS M. BREGMAN, in his official capacity as Trustee of the Client Protection Fund; CHARLES BAGLEY, IV, in his official capacity as Trustee of the Client

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT KENNETH EDWARD DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D22-1362 September 7, 2022 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michael Wil

WR-83,820-01 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 9/2/2015 2:24:00 PM Accepted 9/2/2015 2:52:55 PM

ORDER GRANTING SCBT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT DAVID R. DUNCAN, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on a motion for partial summary judgment entered by defendant SCBT, N.A. f/k/a South Carolina Bank and Trust, N.A. (“SCBT”) on January 4, 2013. Defendant Crop Production Services, Inc. (“CPS”) responded in opposition. The Court held a hearing on the motion for summary judgment on January

85,32@"@‘ GRoss & ESPARZA, P.L.L.C. 106 SOUTH ST. N|ARY’S STREET, SU|TE 260 ‘ SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205 WWW.TXM|L|TARYLAW.COM (210) 354-1919 FAx: (210) 354-1920 M|CHAEL C. GROSS ' JOSEPH A. ESPARZA BOARD CERT|F|ED ~ CR|M|NAL LAW . BOARD CERT|F|ED - CR|M|NAL LAW BOARD CERT|F|ED - CR|MlNAL APf_-"ELLATE LAW ` TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPEC|AL|ZAT|ON TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPEC|AL|ZAT|ON v BOARD CERT|FIED - CR|M|NAL TR|AL ADVOCACY BOARD CERT|F|ED - CR|M|NAL TR|AL ADVOCACY k NAT|ONAL BOARD OF TR|AL ADVOC

647 F.Supp.2d 598 (2009) Edward W. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 4:08-CV-158-BO. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Eastern Division. August 21, 2009. *600 Elizabeth F. Lunn, Gentry Case Merritts Hogan, Wolf & Hogan, P.C., Raleigh, NC, for Plaintiff.

27 So.3d 869 (2009) Lane B. DAVIS and Jeanne D. Davis v. Stephen K. CONROY and Conroy Law Firm, a Professional Law Corporation. No. 09-CA-142. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. October 13, 2009. Writ Denied February 5, 2010. *871 Robert H. Matthews, Pauline M. Warriner, Attorneys at Law, New Orleans, L