Cases

In re: Michael George Turner, Chapter 13, Debtor. Case No. 09-40727. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 21, 2009. OPINION GRANTING THE STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY'S OBJECTION TO CLAIM NUMBER 10 FILED BY THE DEBTOR ON THE STATE'S BEHALF MARCI B. McIVOR, Bankruptcy Judge This matter is before the Court on the State of Michi

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice BREYER delivered the opinion of the Court. In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 ,

PER CURIAM: John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Turner v. Bush, No. 7:06-cv-00526-sgw (W.D.Va. Aug. 81, 2006). We dispense with oral argument becau

DISSENTING OPINION BY DONOHUE, J.: I disagree with the learned Majority that Plumbers Local 690 (“Local 690”) was properly included as a named defendant in the July 18, 2014 preliminary injunction (the “July Injunction”). There is no evidence that Local 690 engaged in any unlawful protests after April 21, 2014 or that other union groups that picketed at the CHOP construction site between April 22 and July 9, 2

770 F.Supp.2d 1244 (2011) Michael TURNER and Joanna Turner, Plaintiffs, v. REGIONS BANK, a domestic corporation, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:10cv1065-MHT. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division. February 28, 2011. *1246 David Windell Vickers, Vickers & White, PLLC, Montgomery, AL, for Plaintif

ZIMMERMAN, Justice, concurring and dissenting: I join in the majority’s statement of the law and its analysis of the depictions at issue here. Turner’s conviction cannot stand. However, I dissent from the affir-mance of the court of appeals judgment that the St. George ordinance is constitutional to the extent that it provides, in section le, that the definition of “sexual co

LOGUE, J. In this condominium project dispute between Maysville, Inc. (“Developer”) and The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company (“General Contractor”), the Developer filed a two-count complaint against the General Contractor and the General Contractor filed several counterclaims. The trial court entered judgment against the

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ANN D. MONTGOMERY, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On January 14, 2013, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral argument on Movants Curtis and Tina Smith’s (“the Smiths”) Motion to Intervene [Docket No. 33] as well as the Smiths’ Motion to Permit Filing of Reply to Opposition to Motion to Intervene [Docket No. 60] (“Motion to Reply”).

OPINION GARFF, Judge: INTRODUCTION Appellant, Brent Allen Turner, appeals his conviction of displaying an obscene picture depicting sexual conduct in violation of St. George City Ordinance No. 2-77-2. We reverse. FACTS Turner operated a retail business in St. George, Utah, vending hard rock record albums and T-shirts. Turner’s small, sign-less store

274 B.R. 675 (2002) In re Randy James TURNER, Debtor. William Pineo, Trustee, Movant, v. Randy James Turner, Village Boston Heights, Ohio, Dennis Nyce, Joseph Varga III, and Robert Zawiski, Respondents. Bankruptcy No. 00-11066. Motion No. PIN-04. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. March 21, 2002. *676 William

759 F.Supp.2d 854 (2011) Patrick Joseph TURNER et al. v. MURPHY OIL USA, INC. Civil Action No. 05-4206. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. January 3, 2011. *855 Mickey P. Landry, David Ryan Cannella, Frank J. Swarr, Landry & Swarr, LLC, Christopher H. Sherwood, The Law Office of Warren A. Forstall, Jr., Gerald Edwa

PER CURIAM: Donnell Cox, Sr. and Mercedes Cox appeal the district court’s order entering judgment after a jury returned a verdict for defendants on the Coxes’ civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Cox v. Prince George’s County, No. CA-02-1492-DKC (D.Md. Aug. 19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adeq

GREMILLION, Judge. This court issued a rule for defendant-appellant, Victory Energy Operation, LLC (Victory), to show cause, by brief only, why its appeal should not be dismissed as taken from a non-appealable judgment. In response, Victory asked this court to convert this appeal into an application for a supervisory writ. For the reasons below, we hereby dismiss the appeal and decline to convert the appeal into an application

George W. Draper III, Judge The Saint Louis Metropolitan Police Department (hereinafter, “SLMPD”), Steven A Gori (hereinafter, “Sgt. Gori”), Michael A. Deeba, Sr. ■ (hereinafter, “Lt. Deeba”), the Saint Louis Board of Police Commissioners (hereinafter, “the Board”) and its individual members (hereinafter and collectively, “Defendants”) appeal the circuit court’s judgment in favor

422 F.Supp.2d 676 (2006) Patrick Joseph TURNER, et al. v. MURPHY OIL USA, INC. This Document Relates to All Cases No. CIV.A. 05-4206. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana, Southern Division. March 27, 2006. *677 Mickey P. Landry, David Ryan Cannella, Frank J. Swarr, Landry & Swarr, LLC,

ORDER AND REASONS FALLON, District Judge. Before the Court is the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. The Court received evidence and argument regarding this motion in a two-day hearing that commenced on January 12, 2006. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification is hereby GRANTED. 1. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND These twenty

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Shon Turner, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles Mikell, deceased, Appellant, v. Medical University of South Carolina, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2016-001986 Appeal From Charleston County J. C. Nicholson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

472 F.Supp.2d 830 (2007) Patrick Joseph TURNER, et al. v. MURPHY OIL USA, INC. No. Civ.A. 05-4206. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. January 30, 2007. Order Denying Amendment February 28, 2007. *831 *832 *833 Mickey P. Landry, D

NOONAN, Circuit Judge: The government appeals the district court’s dismissal of the indictments of five defendants charged with the distribution of crack cocaine — dismissals .imposed as sanctions for failure to comply with the district court’s discovery orders after the defendants had alleged that they were being selectively prosecuted on the basis of their race. Guided by United States v. Armstrong, 48 F.3d 1508