Cases

Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 504 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-23-261 HIOB, LLC, AND YELLOW COMB, LLC Opinion Delivered October 23, 2024 APPELLANTS APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIFTH V.

Opinion issued January 31, 2008 In The Court of Appeals For The

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-21-00083-CV DON MICHAEL HIGGINS AND JANET HIGGINS, Appellants v. CHARLES H. CROWELL, TERESA H. CROWELL, AND CAMP CREEK WATER COMPANY, Appellees From the 82nd District Court Robertson County, Texas Trial Court No. 19-04-2

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 23, 2003 Session MICHAEL HIGGINS v. SHERIFF A. C. GILLESS, JR. A Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. 109954-3 The Honorable D. J. Alissandratos, Chancellor No. W2001-02829-COA-R3-CV - Filed February 19, 2003 Petitioner, off-duty deputy

08/09/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 7, 2021 Session MICHAEL ASHLEY LOCKHART V. CASEY DAWN HIGGINS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Warren County No. 950 Larry B. Stanley, Jr., Judge No. M2020-01370-COA-R3-CV A father fil

*1549Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, One Charles Doe Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any editorial errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Errors may be reported by email at the following address: reporter@courts.state.nh.us. Opinions are available on the Internet

KEARSE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Frank S. Dorman appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Constance Baker Motley, Chief Judge, now Judge, dismissing his pro se complaint, construed as having been brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents,

Affirmed.

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge | ¾Appellant Brenda Higgins appeals the Lonoke County Circuit Court’s grant of summary judgment in a quiet-title action to appellees Bob Thornton, as trustee of the Tonya Merritt Heffner Trust, and Arkansas Children’s Hospital. Higgins contends the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the appellees because m

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he sustained while he was a passenger in a vehicle that was driven by then 19-year-old defendant Michael Higgins and was owned by his parents (hereafter, defendant parents). We conclude that Supreme Court erred in denying that part of the motion of defendant parents seeking summary judgment dismissing the fourth cause of action, and we therefore modify the order and judgment by gran

JUDGMENT AND ORDER GARY A. FENNER, District Judge. Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs Julia Amos, Wendy M. Downing, and Lei-sha Hendrix’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) Motions for Preliminary Injunction. (Docs. ## 6, 13). Plaintiffs request the Court enjoin Defendant Michele A. Higgins, Moniteau County Recorder of Deeds, in her official capacity (“Defendant”), from requiring Plaintiffs’ in

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be reversed, with costs, and the fourth cause of action against John and Heather Higgins reinstated. There is an issue of fact as to whether defendants provided adequate supervision for minor guests who became intoxicated at their home and, in particular, whether defendants properly supervised thei

515 S.E.2d 17 (1999) Tommy HIGGINS, Employee, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL POWELL BUILDERS, Employer, and Key Benefit Services, Carrier, Defendants. No. COA98-812. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 6, 1999. *18 Michaels Jones Martin Parris & Tessener, PLLC, by James S. Walker, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellee. Orbock B

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. After the district court disqualified Kent Higgins’s causation expert — enlisted to prove that Higgins developed asthma and reactive airways dysfunction syndrome as a consequence of inhaling chlorine gas at an amusement park — he argued that he did not need an expert to prove negligence at all. Alternatively, Higgins argued that his treating physician could serve as such an expert. The district court disa

937 N.E.2d 215 (2010) 401 Ill. App.3d 1120 Bruce HIGGINS, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. David G. RICHARDS, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant. No. 5-08-0605. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. June 17, 2010. Rehearing Denied July 14, 2010. *217 Bob L. Perica, The

ORDER AND REASONS NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, District Judge. Before the Court are the parties’ memoranda regarding the timeliness of the plaintiffs’ claims, which this Court ordered after it indicated that it was inclined to grant summary judgment independent of a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f)(3).1 After considering the complaint, the amended

Fearing, J. ¶1 Target National Bank sued Jeanette Higgins for defaulting on a credit card debt. The trial court granted Higgins’ motion for summary judgment. As the prevailing party, Higgins requested $11,076 in reasonable *169attorney fees and costs under both RCW 4.84.250 and RCW 4.84.330, respectively labeled the “small claims settlement statute” and the “reciprocal at

ORFINGER, J. David S. Higgins appeals from a final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of Timber Springs Homeowners Association, Inc. Mr. Higgins contends that the trial court erred by denying his request to stay the proceedings and to vacate the final summary judgment of foreclosure in Timber Springs’s favor. We agree and reverse. Timber Springs, claiming that it was owed $363.33 in unpaid homeowner’s

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. Michael Coffman, an inmate appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In order to merit a COA, Mr. Coffman must make “a substantial sho