Cases

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Rei Feng Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying as untimely, by approximately fifteen years, his motion to reopen his earlier removal proceedings on the purported basis of changed country circumstances. We exercise jurisdiction and deny Wang’s petition for review. The BIA did n

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

671 F.3d 120 (2011) Colin WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, Ronald Levy, Michael Bonde, Plaintiffs, v. MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.[*] Docket No. 10-1528-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: February 25, 2011. Decided: November 14, 2011.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MICHAEL ALEXANDER LYNCH, ) DOC # D65181, ) ) Appellant, )

779 F.Supp.2d 1085 (2011) Bradford SHAFFER, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., Chair and Committee Members, Management, Development and Compensation Committee, Board of Directors of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Defendants-Respondents. No. C 11-0303 CRB. United States District Court, N.D. California. Apr

LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge. Peggy Howard (“Howard”) appeals from the district court’s affirmance of the order of the bankruptcy court dismissing her Chapter 13 petition and overruling her objection to the proof of claim of Lexington Investments, Inc. (“Lexington”). We affirm, holding that Howard’s non-compliance with the bankruptcy court’s order to file state tax re

ORDER WALKER, District Judge. The instant appeal arises from the high-profile bankruptcy of appellee Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG & E). PG & E filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on April 6, 2001. On December 18, 2003, after extensive settlement negotiations, appellee California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) voted 3-2 to approve a modified settlement agreement (MSA) betw

JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. The Plaintiffs-Appellees (“Petitioners”) have petitioned for rehearing of our December 5, 2006, decision reversing the District Court’s grant of their motion for class certification. See Miles v. Merrill Lynch & Co. (In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation), 471 F.3d 24 (2d Cir.2006). The petition asserts three grounds: (1) our initial decision adopted incorrect standards

[Cite as State v. Howard, 2025-Ohio-340.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NOS. 2024-T-0042 2024-T-0064 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeals from the - vs - Court of Common

JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal primarily concerns the issue, surprisingly unsettled in this Circuit, as to what standards govern a district judge in adjudicating a motion for class certification under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Comprehended within this broad issue are subsidiary issues such as whether a definitive ruling must be made that each Rule 23 requirement has been met or whether only so

434 F.Supp.2d 554 (2006) Marybeth CREMIN, Nancy Thomas, Anne Kaspar, Sonia Ingram, Alice Moss, Linda Conti, Anne Marie Kearney and Angela Covo, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., Defendant. No. 96 C 3773. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. May 25, 2006.

328 F.Supp.2d 865 (2004) Mary Beth CREMIN, Nancy Thomas, Anne Kaspar, Sonia Ingram, Alice Moss, Linda Conti, Anne Marie Kearney and Angela Covo, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., Defendant. No. 96 C 3733. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 3, 2004.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS. ROGERS, Circuit Judge. During a ten-month period in 2000, Michael Lessin lost $5.6 million in his brokerage account with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. He appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate an arbitration award in his favor for $32,975. Less

HOWARD, Chief Judge. Acting on an alleged tip that undocumented aliens were employed there, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) agents raided the Michael Bianco, Inc. factory in New Bedford, Massachusetts. Petitioner Marcia Garcia-Aguilar was detained during that raid. She argues that her arrest and detention involved constitutional violations sufficiently egregious to war

HUDSON, Judge. Plaintiff appeals an order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Initially, plaintiff assigned as error multiple orders, including: (1) the denial of plaintiff’s motion for findings of fact, (2) the granting of defendants’ motions to amend, and (3) the granting of defendants’ motions for summary judgment and judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiff’s sole argument on appeal concerns the granting of def

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ November 21, 2014 ERRATA ______________________ Appeal No. 2014-1137 IN RE HOWARD Decided: November 13, 2014 Nonprecedential Opinion _____________________ Please make the following change: On page one, replace the paragraph:

CLARK, Circuit Judge: This is the second time this case has been before us. In Howard v. McLucas, 782 F.2d 956, 960-61 (11th Cir.1986) (Howard III), we held that white and nonminority employees (the intervenors) at the Warner Robins Air Logistics Center (Warner Robins) could intervene to challenge race-conscious promotional relief in a consent decree entered into by black employees (the plaintiffs) at Warn

671 F.Supp. 756 (1987) Michael HOWARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John L. McLUCAS, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 75-168-MAC (WDO). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division. September 30, 1987. As Corrected October 5, 1987. *757 Jack Greenberg, Ronald L. Ellis, New York City, Bill Lann Lee, Los Ang

DECISION AND ORDER MICHAEL A. TELESCA, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff James P. Boyle (“Boyle” or “Plaintiff’), represented by counsel, brings this action pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12201 et seq. (“ADA”), and the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law §§ 290 et seq. (“HRL”), alleging that his former employer,

MEMORANDUM OPINION T. S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge Plaintiffs in this immigration case challenge the denial by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“US-CIS”)1 of a petition for immediate relative status filed by plaintiff Frank Scott Strun-iak on behalf of his spouse, Aygul Minigali-na. Specifically, plaintiffs argue that: