Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Michael Lee Terry”
In the Matter of: Terry Lee Smithpublic domain
PER CURIAM. The Indiana' Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission filed a- “Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action” against Respondent Terry Lee Smith, charging him with attorney misconduct based on actions taken while prosecuting a defendant’s retrial. Respondent’s 1977 admission to this state’s bar subjects him to this Court’s disciplinary jurisdiction. See
Terry Lee Stimmel v. Jefferson B. Sessionspublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 18a0003p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT TERRY LEE STIMMEL, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │
Terry E. Harris v. Eddie Michael, Jrpublic domain
FAIR, J., for the court: ¶ 1. In this negligence case, Terry Harris sued Eddie Michael Jr. and BellSouth Telecommunications, claiming that he suffered injuries from Michael’s failure to stop and yield to his vehicle at an intersection. At the close of Harris’s case, the defendants moved for a directed verdict. We find the court erred in granting the defendants’ motion. Thus, we reverse and remand.
United States v. Terry Lee Presleypublic domain
CARNES, Circuit Judge: Terry Lee Presley brings us two appeals, which we have consolidated. In the first one he appeals the revocation of his supervised release. He contends that under 18 U.S.C. § 3583® the district court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his release after the term of it was over, because the allegations behind the warrant and the summons that were issued to begin t
Terry v. Statepublic domain
JAMES, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Michael Dewayne Terry was indicted for burglary of a dwelling. A jury trial was held, resulting in a guilty verdict. Terry was sentenced to five years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, with three years suspended. On appeal, Terry asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict and his post-trial motion for a judgment not
Terry v. Henningpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Eric. Terry appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea*101sons stated by the distric
Terry Lee Passmore Swann v. Southern Healthpublic domain
COX, Circuit Judge: The Plaintiff, Terry Lee Passmore Swann (“Swann”), executor of the estate of Merri Elizabeth Passmore, appeals the district court’s judgment for the Defendant, Southern Health Partners, Inc. (“SHP”). The court granted the Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs second amended complaint for failure to satisfy the heightened pleading standard applicable to
Terry v. Statepublic domain
Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 14th of March 2017 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."
Terry v. Statepublic domain
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 1st of March 2017 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th of June 2017."
United States v. Terry Honeycuttpublic domain
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment. I agree that Terry Honeycutt’s convictions and his sentence should be affirmed, except insofar as we must vacate the sentences imposed for his § 843(a)(6) convictions as exceeding the applicable statutory maximum. I also agree that we must reverse the district court’s refusal to order forfeiture, bound as we are by a decision of a prior panel of t
Terry v. Statepublic domain
DAVIS, Judge. Plaintiffs, a class consisting of state troopers who were employed by the State of North Carolina between 1 July 2009 and 30 June 2014, appeal from the trial court's order dismissing various claims asserted by them in connection with their contention that the North Carolina General Assembly improperly suspended certain future salary increases that had been promised to them. After careful review, we affirm.
State v. Terrypublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-06588-9, Kathleen Learned, J., entered April 3, 1996. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
State v. Leepublic domain
Leach, J. ¶1 Michael Terry Lee appeals the sentencing court’s oral advisement that he could not be “anywhere near a firearm” or “in the same house or the same car with a firearm.” Because the court’s remarks misstate Washington law on constructive possession, we grant discretionary review and strike the oral advisement in favor of the written statutory advisement. FACTS ¶2 Lee pleaded guilty
Lee v. Briggspublic domain
23 So.3d 362 (2009) Terry LEE v. Jerry BRIGGS and Safeway Insurance Company of Louisiana. No. 2008 CA 2120. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. September 10, 2009. *363 Michael C. Davis, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, for Plaintiff/Appellee, Terry Lee. Matthew D. Fontenot, Lafayette, Louisiana, for Defendants/Appellants,
State v. Leepublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 08-1-12163-8, Susan J. Craighead, J., entered April 20,2009. Affirmed as modified by unpublished opinion per Leach, J., concurred in by Dwyer, C.J., and Cox, J.
Terry v. Safeco Insurance Co. of Americapublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. This is an uninsured-motorist insurance case. The remaining issue is whether the insurer’s offer to settle a claim on terms that the insureds unequivocally rejected triggered the five-day-payment provision under § 542.057 of the Texas Insurance Code. Section 542.057 requires an insurer to pay the insured within five business days after notice that the
Rector v. Terrypublic domain
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Acker v. Acker, 904 So.2d 384 (Fla.2005). THOMPSON, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
United States v. Michael Terry, Jr.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0229p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-App
State of Tennessee v. Terry Lee McAnultypublic domain
01/04/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 7, 2021 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TERRY LEE MCANULTY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Tipton County No. 9812 Joseph H. Walker, III, Judge No. W2021-00382-CCA-R3-CD Th
Eve Lynn Baker v. Terry Lee Bizzlepublic domain
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 22-0242 ══════════ Eve Lynn Baker, Petitioner v. Terry Lee Bizzle, Respondent ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Second Di