Cases

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 16, 2006 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 16, 2006. In The

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: *187 The United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) denied Dolores Margarita Gonzalez a certificate of citizenship, first in 2008, then again in 2016. Gonzalez challenged only the agency's 2016 denial. The Government argues Gonzalez's ch

129 F.Supp.2d 832 (2001) Patrick J. GRIFFIN, III v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, et al. No. Civ.A. WMN-00-2837. United States District Court, D. Maryland. January 29, 2001. *833 *834 Steven D. Campen, Law Office, Frederick, MD, Stephen Samuel Burgoon, Greber & Simms, Frederick, MD, Mich

ROBERTS, C.J. These three appellate cases are all that remain of a large consolidated appeal involving the Department of Juvenile Justice (the Department) and twenty Florida counties over the juvenile detention cost-sharing system in section 985.686, Florida Statutes. The three appellant counties, Marion, Polk, and Seminole, joined seventeen other counties in challenging the Dep

162 F.Supp.2d 406 (2001) SIERRA CLUB, et al. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al. No. CIV.A. WMN-97-3838. United States District Court, D. Maryland. September 10, 2001. *407 *408 Simon K. Walton, Schultheis & Walton, P.A., Baltimore, MD, James Robert May, Widener Univer

795 F.Supp. 76 (1992) Eli FRANKEL, Plaintiff, v. Donald SLOTKIN, Carl H. Lindner, Louis A. Guzzetti, Keith E. Lindner, S. Craig Lindner, David H. Lubetzky, Jean H. Sisco, Ronald F. Walker, Jay Wells, American Financial Corporation, FMI Financial Corporation and United Brands Company, Defendants. No. 85 C 3385. United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 2, 1992.

PER CURIAM. In this appeal, the Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) seeks review of an Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) Final Order. The Final Order declared certain DJJ rules relating to cost sharing for secure detention invalid exercises of DJJ’s authority; specifically, DJJ’s interpretations of “final court disposition” and “actual costs.” We find the ALJ correctly determined that DJJ’s interpretations were improper.</

405 Mass. 29 (1989) 537 N.E.2d 588 STANLEY M. SAMPSON, administrator[1], vs. CITY OF LYNN & others[2]. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. February 6, 1989. May 4, 1989. Present: WILKINS, LIACOS, ABRAMS, NOLAN, & LYNCH, JJ. Theodore J. Dennis for the plaintiff. Charles M. Bur

184 F.Supp.2d 1203 (2000) SEMINOLE COUNTY, City of Casselberry, Florida, Plaintiffs, v. PINTER ENTERPRISES, INC., Michael E. Pinter, et al., Defendants. No. 6:00CV436ORL-28A. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. September 26, 2000. *1204 Robert Alexander McMillan, Seminole County Attorney's office, Sanfor

PER CURIAM. This appeal arose from administrative proceedings addressing the cost-sharing procedures and the allocation of costs for secure juvenile detention pursuant to section 985.686, Florida Statutes (2008). This statute sets out the State’s and counties’ joint obligation to contribute to the funding of secure juvenile detention. § 985.686(1). Appellants, the counties, seek review of the Department of Juvenile Justice’s f

Hicks, J. The defendant, Samuel Biondolillo, appeals his conviction, following a bench trial in the 6th Circuit Court — Concord District Division (.Spath, J.), of disorderly conduct, see RSA 644:2, 11(e) (2007). He argues: (1) that his conviction violates his constitutional right to free speech; (2) that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction; and (3) that, for several reasons, the trial

WOLF, J. Appellants challenge a final judgment of the trial court finding appellee, the Board of County Commissioners of Okaloosa County (County), did not abandon the use of a certain piece of property as a “County Courthouse Annex facility.” Finding no abandonment of use, the court concluded that a reverter clause contained within the 1973 deed had not been triggered. We find the trial court’s determination to be supported

MEADE, J. *233Following the approval by the zoning board of appeals of Somerville (ZBA) of a modification of a special permit submitted by Esh Circus Arts, LLC, Ellen Waylonis, and Belam II, LLC, the property owner (collectively Esh unless otherwise noted), Claudia Murrow appealed the approval to the Land Court,

529 U.S. 89 (2000) UNITED STATES v. LOCKE, GOVERNOR OF WASHINGTON, et al. No. 98-1701. United States Supreme Court. Argued December 7, 1999. Decided March 6, 2000.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT *90 *91

946 F.Supp. 415 (1996) Mae Elizabeth SIMMONS v. Donna SHALALA, Secretary, Health and Human Services. Civil Action No. WMN-96-1472. United States District Court, D. Maryland. November 27, 1996. *416 Mae Elizabeth Simmons, pro se. Allen F. Loucks and Lynne A. Battaglia, Office of the U.S. Attorney for the District of Marylan

Nickerson, Gary A., J. INTRODUCTION This action involves a dispute between neighboring landowners. In this case, the plaintiffs, Dr. Warren Woods and Joann Woods (the “Woodses”), claim that their oceanfront property has been damaged by their neighbors’ construction and maintenance of their coastal rock revetments.3 The Woodses seek relief against their neighbors (Linda

603 F.Supp.2d 943 (2009) Jerry HARTFIELD, Petitioner, v. Nathaniel QUARTERMAN, Respondent. Civil Action No. H-07-3676. United States District Court, S.D. Texas. February 25, 2009. *945 Brent Evan Newton, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Houston, TX, for Petitioner. *946 Joseph P. Corc

432 F.Supp.2d 1017 (2006) STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMBILE INSURANCE COMPNY, Plaintiff, v. George MENDOZA, et al. Defendants. George Mendoza, Plaintiff, v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV.02-1141 PHX ROS, CIV.03-164 PHX ROS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. June 2, 2006. *1018

774 F.Supp. 376 (1991) UNITED STATES of America and State of Maryland v. Edward AZRAEL, et al. Civ. A. No. WN 89-2898. United States District Court, D. Maryland. September 20, 1991. *377 Warren K. Rich and Graham & James, Washington, D.C., for third-party plaintiffs Edward Azrael, Harriet Azrael and Estate of Cele Landay.

liPETERS, J. Toby Armentor filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits, asserting that he sustained injuries to his neck and back while in the course of his employment with Arrow Pest Control (Arrow). Armentor and Arrow stipulated that Armentor did in fact sustain a work injury on May 6, 1998, and that Armentor is currently temporarily, totally disabled. Additionally, the parties stipulated that Arrow has paid Armentor