Cases

Justice NEWBY dissenting. The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that arbitration agreements may not be invalidated by state-law defenses arising from the fact that an arbitration agreement is at issue. Congress has explicitly indicated that arbitration is to be favored. Despite these mandates, the majority invents a new defense to enforcement of an arbitration agreement, not raised by plaintiff be

Court’s Motion for Supplemental Briefing Special Order 02/19/2016

ORDER This case has come before the Court by way of defendants’ Petition for Discretionary Review. Defendants sought review of the second opinion of the Court of Appeals in King v. Bryant (King II), _ N.C. App. _, 763 S.E.2d 338, 2014 WL 3510481 (2014) (unpublished). There the Court of Appeals held that it was bound by its prior opinion in the same case to hold that a fiduciary relationship existed between the parties. Id

*143Affirmed by unpublished P-ER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William J. Neal, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reason

ORDER On 21 August 2015, this Court certified this case to the trial court for additional findings of fact as to “[w]hether a physician-patient relationship existed at the time Mr. King signed the arbitration agreement.” On 6 November 2015, the trial court entered additional findings of fact. On 22 February 2016, this Court ordered the parties to submit supplemental briefs addressing the effect, if any, of the t

Defs’ PDR under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA13-1003) Special Order

ORDER On 21 August 2015, this Court ordered this case certified to the trial court for additional findings of fact as to “[w]hether a physician-patient relationship existed at the time Mr. King signed the arbitration agreement.” On 6 November 2015, the trial court entered the additional findings of fact. Now, the Court, on its own motion, orders that the parties submit supplemental briefs on the effect of the trial

ORDER On 21 August 2015, this Court ordered this case certified to the trial court for additional findings of fact as to “[w]hether a physician-patient relationship existed at the time Mr. King signed the arbitration agreement.” On 6 November 2015, the trial court entered the additional findings of fact. Now, the Court, on its own motion, orders that the parties submit supplemental briefs on the effect of the trial cou

Special Order

HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge. Michael S. Bryant, M.D. (“Dr. Bryant”) and Village Surgical Associates, PA. (collectively, “Defendants”) appeal from an order of the Cumberland County Superior Court denying their “Motion to Stay Proceedings and Enforce Arbitration Agreement.” For the following reasons, we reverse and remand. I. Factual and Procedural History This appeal arises out of a med

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA13-1003) Allowed Hunter, J., recused

McFadden, Presiding Judge. *597 After a jury trial, Michael Jerome Bryant was convicted of rape. He appeals the denial of his motion for new trial, arguing that trial counsel was ineffective, but he has not met his burden of showing both deficient performance and prejudice. He also argues th

[Cite as Neal v. Gersten, 2024-Ohio-1405.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROSS COUNTY Stephen A. Neal, Jr. : Case No. 22CA11 Treasurer of Ross County, Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : v. DE

400 F.Supp.2d 134 (2005) Besseye NEAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTOR, D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 93-2420 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 22, 2005. *135 Ted Justice Williams, Avis E. Buchanan, DC, Public Defender Service, Jeffrey Fred Liss, Mary Elizab

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 118,848 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. TIMOTHY C. BRYANT, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The legality of a sen

[Cite as Bryant v. Solis, 2020-Ohio-1249.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Soraya Bryant, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 19AP-380 v. : (M.C. No. 2018 CVI 031235) Josue Solis, :

11/20/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 21, 2019 Session ANTHONY ARRINGTON v. BARBARA BRYANT ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Greene County No. 2017-CV-426 Douglas T. Jenkins, Chancellor1 No.

CALABRIA, Judge. James Michael Collier (“Michael”), Kimberly Collier (“Kimberly”), and Cheryl Dette (“Dette”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Angela Collier Bryant *421(“Ms. Bryant”), Daniel Christopher Bryant (“Mr. Bryant”), Southern Homes, LLC (“Southern”) (collectively “defendants”) and Cathe Henderson (“Henderson

ORDER & OPINION 1 RONALD A. WHITE, District Judge. Plaintiffs Kelly Bryant and Hollie Bryant (hereinafter referenced individually as “Kelly” and “Hollie”) brought this action against Defendant Sagamore Insurance Company (hereinafter “Sagamore”) on May 31, 2013 seeking damages for breach of contract and bad faith. As to the bad faith claims, the court prev

02/28/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 10, 2018 Session MICHAEL JON ECKLEY v. MARGIT ECKLEY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. C-2015-CV-891 Ross H. Hicks, Judge ___________________________________