Cases

Per Curiam-. This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator against the respondent, Charles P. Vaughn, of Inverness, Florida, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Kansas in 1981. On June 15, 2015, the office of the Disciplinary Administrator filed a formal complaint against

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00019-CV In re Texas Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Society; Stuart L. Abramson, M.D., Ph.D.; Wesley W. Stafford, M.D.; Theodore M. Freeman, M.D.; William McKenna, M.D.; and Michael P. Vaughn, M.D., Ph.D. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY MEMORANDUM OPINION The petition for writ of mandamus

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00019-CV In re Texas Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Society; Stuart L. Abramson, M.D., Ph.D.; Wesley W. Stafford, M.D.; Theodore M. Fre

PER CURIAM: Donta Vaughn appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a temporary restraining order, which the district court construed as a complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 408 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district c

OPINION AND ORDER DAN AARON POLSTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Medical Mutual of Ohio’s Motion to Intervene (the “Motion”). Doe #: 28. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is denied. I. Background According to the Complaint, on January 26, 2012, Aida Cemanovic was involved in a ear collision whilst operating a 2004 Toyota Corolla. Compl

DAVIS, Justice. [¶1] Appellant Alex J. Vaughn was adjudicated a delinquent juvenile for committing a serious sexual offense that required him to register as an offender under the Wyoming Sexual Offender Registration Act (WSORA). He subsequently failed to report changes in his address as required, and pled guilty to two felony counts for failing to do so. His plea was conditional

649 F.3d 1061 (2011) Alex FAYER, aka James McLynn, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arthur VAUGHN; State of Nevada, ex rel. Nevada Gaming Control Board, Enforcement Division; Mirage Casino-Hotel, Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-15520. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 12, 2011.[*] Filed May 4, 2011.

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County dismissing the petition of appellants, Jason and Christy Vaughn, the prospective adoptive parents of G.T.B., a minor child, for a writ of habeas corpus to compel the child’s biological father, appellee, Benjamin Wyrembek, to return

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge Plaintiff Jonathon Vaughn (“Plaintiff’) filed this civil rights action against CA, Inc.1 (“Defendant”) on April 28, 2014, alleging discriminatory termination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Before the Court is Defendant’s m

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Elaine E. Bucklo, United States District Judge Albert Vaughn, Sr. (“Vaughn”), the administrator of his deceased son’s estate, claims that the City of Chicago and three of its police officers (collectively, “Defendants”) violated his son’s due process rights when they ordered him to drop his weapon during an altercation in West En-glewood and then failed to protect him

PER CURIAM. Justin Vaughn appeals the non-final order denying his motion to quash service of process.1 He argues that the court erred in denying his motion where the summons was not sealed as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(a), which specifically requires process to be “issued ... under the clerk’s or the judge’s signature and the seal of the court_” (Emphasis added). S

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: The opinion issued September 7, 2018 is withdrawn by the panel, and the following is issued in its place: The plaintiffs-relators initiated a qui tam action under the False Claims Act ("FCA"), Anti-Kickback Statute, and related

PER CURIAM Reversed. Bailey v. Johnson, 165 Or App 450, 997 P2d 871, rev den 330 Or 375 (2000).

These appeals involve the construction of an automobile insurance policy. They present the question whether the sole named insured was entitled to reject uninsured-motorist coverage with respect to some, but not all, additional insureds. We hold that it was. I. Facts and procedural history Melvin Arthur Vaughn was an employee of Farmers Tractor Company, Inc. ("Farmers"). On April 25, 2002, Vaughn was driving a vehicle owned by Farmers and covered by a

288 S.W.3d 931 (2009) Brad VAUGHN and East Coast Directional Drilling, Inc., Appellants, v. INTREPID DIRECTIONAL DRILLING SPECIALISTS, LTD., Appellee. No. 11-08-00259-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland. April 30, 2009. *932 Michael B. McKinney, McKinney & Tighe, L.L.P., Midland, for appellants. Brian Matthew Catal

28 P.3d 636 (2001) 175 Or. App. 192 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Douglas Melvin VAUGHN, Appellant. 990848453; A109240 Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted April 5, 2001. Decided July 5, 2001. *637 Garrett A. Richardson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appe

¶34 (concurring in part, dissenting in part) — I concur with the majority that Vaughn Community Church (VCC) has the right to sell the church property at issue. However, I would hold that the 1956 deed conveyed a fee simple absolute in the property. The majority’s opinion *387affirming the trial court’s restrictions on the property violates two fundamental, long-sta

135 P.3d 721 (2006) Defendant-Appellant: Michael VAUGHN, v. Plaintiffs-Appellees: The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, ex rel. Harold D. SIMPSON, State Engineer for the State of Colorado, and James R. Hall, Division Engineer for Water Division 1. No. 04SA381. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. May 15, 2006. Riske & Salisbury, P.C., Don W. Riske, Cheyenne, WY, f

962 P.2d 149 (1998) Jeremy VAUGHN, Appellant (Defendant), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff). No. 97-79. Supreme Court of Wyoming. July 2, 1998 *150 Sylvia Lee Hackl, State Public Defender, PDP; Donna D. Domonkos, Appellate Counsel; Diane M. Lozano, Assistant Appellate Counsel, for Appellant. Argument by Ms. Lozano.

Armstrong, J. (Dissenting) Because the trial court erred in ruling that RCW 49.60.224 prevents this kind of charitable gift to a church and also erred in applying equitable principles to effectively dissolve the trust, I dissent. The trial court ruled that the trust provisions of the deed violate RCW 49.60.224, apparently reasoning that the perpetual gift language was intended as a discriminator