Cases

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1055.1 KA 13-00583 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V ORDER MICHAEL ROLLINS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (TIMOTHY P. MURPHY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BU

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1382 KA 13-00583 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MICHAEL ROLLINS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CAITLIN M. CONNELLY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY,

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boiler, A.J.), rendered March 15, 2013. The appeal was held by this Court by order entered February 13, 2015, the decision was reserved and the matter was remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings (125 AD3d 1540 [2015]). Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by defendant on June 11, 2015, and by the attorneys for the

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boiler, A.J.), rendered March 15, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree. It is hereby ordered that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further pr

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boiler, A.J.), rendered March 15, 2013. The appeal was held by this Court by order entered February 13, 2015, the decision was reserved and the matter was remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings (125 AD3d 1540 [2015]). Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by defendant on June 11, 2015, and by the attorneys for the

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boiler, A.J.), rendered March 15, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree. It is hereby ordered that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further pr

53 F.3d 332NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Claude Michael ROLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.MIDLAND STEEL PRODUCTS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-3138. United States

PERRET, Judge. The issue is this appeal is whether the trial court properly dismissed Michael Neal Rollins' ("Plaintiff") suit against the State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Public Safety and Corrections, ("State of Louisiana") based on abandonment. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court judgment. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY: In September 2008, Plaintiff wa

Denied.

POSNER, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of police officers, the chief of police, and the mayor of the Village of Glenwood, Illinois. They are the defendants in a suit brought by Rodney Rollins under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 charging an unlawful seizure. Rollins had driven into the parking lot of an Aldi’s grocery store and gotten out of his car when a police officer emerged from a police car that had pulled u

Greaney, J. A District Court jury convicted the defendant of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, G. L. c. 90, § 24. In affirming the conviction, the Appeals Court rejected the defendant’s arguments that there was insufficient evidence of his diminished ability to drive *115safely, and that he was prejudiced by a “missing witness” i

On appeal from his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the *912influence of alcohol,1 the defendant challenges both the denial of his motion for a required finding of not guilty and the giving of a missing witness instruction. We aflirm. 1. Diminished capacity. The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwea

JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendants' motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. ECF No. 249. The Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs bring this putative class action on behalf of all participants, former participants, and beneficiaries of the Dignity Health Pension Plan ("the Dignity Plan" or "t

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT THELTON E. HENDERSON, United States District Judge This matter came before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for partial summary judgment on June 16, 2014. Having considered the parties’ arguments and the papers submitted, the Court now GRANTS Plaintiffs motion and DENIES Def

OPINION W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellee Starla Rollins filed this putative class action against her former employer, Defendant-Appellant Dignity Health, its Chief Human Resources Officer, unnamed members of its Retirement Subcommittee, and other unnamed fiduciaries (collectively “Dignity Health”), alleging that Dignity Health has not maint

738 N.W.2d 798 (2007) In the Matter of the Petition of Michael C. ROLLINS for the Establishment of a Cartway. No. A06-2107. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. September 25, 2007. Wilbert Hendricks, Hendricks Law Firm, Pine River, MN; and Katherine *799 MacKinnon, St. Louis Park, MN, for appellant Michael C. Rollins. Timothy J. Grande,

364 S.W.3d 639 (2012) Ray Anthony ROLLINS, Appellant, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. No. WD 73795. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 31, 2012. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 27, 2012. Application for Transfer Denied May 29, 2012. Ray Anthony Rollins, Farmingt

*578ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in the conclusion of the majority that Rollins’ convictions should be affirmed. As to the sentence of death, however, I respectfully dissent. I continue to adhere to my view that the comparative proportionality review protocol currently emb

PER CURIAM: * AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

215 P.3d 449 (2009) Michael J. ROLLINS, Petitioner-Respondent, v. BLAINE COUNTY, State of Idaho, a body politic and political subdivision of the State of Idaho, acting through it duly elected Board of County Commissioners, Defendant-Appellant, and Brian Poster, Intervenor. No. 33658-2006. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, June 2009 Term. July 7, 2009. Rehearin