Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 8, 2016 Session WILLIAM THOMAS MCFARLAND v. MICHAEL S. PEMBERTON ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Roane County No. 2014-105 Jon Kerry Blackwood, Senior Judge

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 8, 2016 Session WILLIAM THOMAS MCFARLAND v. MICHAEL S. PEMBERTON ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Roane County No. 2014105 Jon Kerry Blackwood, Senior Judge ___________________________________ No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 8, 2016 Session WILLIAM THOMAS MCFARLAND v. MICHAEL S. PEMBERTON ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Roane County No. 2014105 Jon Kerry Blackwood, Senior Judge ___________________________________ No

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 1, 2015 Session WILLIAM THOMAS MCFARLAND v. MICHAEL S. PEMBERTON, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Roane County No. 2014-105 Jon Kerry Blackwood, Judge1 No. E2014-02176-COA-R3-CV-FILED-NOVEMBER 16, 2015 _________________________________ This cas

BENTON, Circuit Judge. . Michael M. Thomas appeals his convictions for domestic assault by an habitual offender and assaulting an intimate partner by suffocation or attempted suffocation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a)(8), 117, and '1153, Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms. At trial,

GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: Michael Thomas worked as the Information Technology Operations Manager for ClickMotive, LP, a software and webpage hosting company. Upset that a coworker had been fired, Thomas embarked on a weekend campaign of electronic sabotage. He deleted over 600 files, disabled backup operations, eliminated employees from a group email a cl

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. Darreyll Thomas, a Wisconsin prisoner, alleges in this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that when he was in the Dane County Jail, several county correctional officers unlawfully used excessive force in the course of handcuffing him after he disobeyed an order. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants on the ground that Thomas had not ex

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Rosanna S. Crum, Plaintiff Below, Petitioner FILED October 28, 2016 vs) No. 15-1131 (Mingo County 15-C-68) RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF

Easterbrook, Circuit Judge. An earlier opinion in this case concluded that people whose property is taken into custody by Illinois under the state's Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act, 765 ILCS 1026/15-607, are entitled to receive the time value of their property (that is, interest or other earnings), less reasonable custodial fees. Kolton v. Frerichs ,

ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., Presiding Judge Thé Director of Revenue appeals from the judgment of the trial court reinstating the driving privileges of Thomas Prade, which were suspended after his arrest for driving while intoxicated. The Director argues that the trial court erred in excluding from evidence the breath sample results showing Prade’s blood alcohol content (“BAC”) was over

HUFF, Chief Judge. After a bench trial in the Circuit Court of the City of Fredericksburg (“trial court”), Michael Thomas Terlecki (“appellant”) was found guilty of possession of child pornography, in violation of Code § 18.2-374.1:1(A), and sentenced to three years’ incarceration with two years and four months suspended. On appeal, appellant presents two assignments of error: </

JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge. Michael R. Thomas Bail Bond Co. (“Appellant”) appeals from the Circuit Court of Saline County’s denial of its motion to set aside the court’s judgment of bond forfeiture related to the criminal case of Jeron M. Love. For the following reasons, the judgment is affirmed. On October 22, 2010, Love was charged with a misdemeanor offense in Saline County. Appellant, a licensed, corporat

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2020 WY 99 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2020 July 29, 2020 IN THE MATTER OF THE PHYLLIS V. MCDILL REVOCABLE TRUST: THOMAS P. MCDILL, JR., Appellant (Respondent), S-19-0231 v. MICHAEL G. MCDILL, Appellee (Petitione

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District  MICHAEL RAY THOMAS,   WD81329 Appellant,  OPINION FILED: v.   APRIL 2, 2019 H

OPINION Opinion by Justice FITZGERALD. This dispute between siblings Thomas Sutton and Brenda Levetz arises out of a mediated settlement agreement (“MSA”) in this action and a corollary will contest pending in another county. Following a determination that Levetz had capacity to enter the MSA, the trial court signed a final judgment

WALLER, CHIEF JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Quindon D. Thomas, an employee of a contractor at Chevron’s petroleum refinery plant in Pascagoula, Mississippi, was injured on the job. Thomas accepted workers’ compensation benefits provided by Chevron for his injuries, Thomas then sued Chevron and one of its employees for the same injuries. Chevron asserted the

DAVIS, Justice. [¶ 1] A jury found Appellant John Thomas Hereford guilty of second-degree murder for shooting and killing his cousin, and also of kidnapping and sexually assaulting his cousin's girlfriend. Appellant challenges his convictions on two theories. He claims that the district court erred in instructing the jury that it could presume malice from the use of a deadly wea

05/28/2026 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 6, 2026 IN RE MICHAEL S. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamblen County No. 2024-CV-339 Douglas T. Jenkins, Chancellor ___________

Order Per Curiam:. Appellants Deanthony Thomas and similarly situated fellow class members who obtained second .mortgages on Missouri real property that, were acquired and/or serviced by Respondents appeal from the rulings of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying the Appellants’ motion to enforce settlement agreement and judgment relating to the defined term “Active Loan” (which was • inc

OPINION ON REHEARING May, Judge. Thomas N. Eckerle requests we reconsider our opinion for a variety of reasons. We grant rehearing for the sole purpose of correcting two immaterial factual errors. Paragraph 4 of Eckerle v. Katz & Korin, P.C. and Michael W. Hile, 49A02-1608-CT-1894