Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Michelle Elaine McCarty”
Mildred Elaine Thompson Rayner v. Ronnie Penningtonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2008-CA-01924-SCT MILDRED ELAINE THOMPSON RAYNER, INDIVIDUALLY AND MICHELLE LYNN RAYNER BYNUM, AS NATURAL MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND OF BILLY JOE DAVID BYNUM, A MINOR v. SHERIFF RONNIE PENNINGTON, FOR THE COUNTY OF RANKIN, MISSISSIPPI, MICHAEL B. McCARTY, AND JOHN DOES 1-6 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/14/2008 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WILLIAM E. CHAPMAN, III COURT FRO
Rayner v. Penningtonpublic domain
25 So.3d 305 (2010) Mildred Elaine Thompson RAYNER, Individually and Michelle Lynn Rayner Bynum, as Natural Mother and Next Friend of Billy Joe David Bynum, A Minor v. Sheriff Ronnie PENNINGTON, for the County of Rankin, Mississippi, Michael B. McCarty, and John Does 1-6. No. 2008-CA-01924-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. January 7, 2010.
Dickieson v. DER Travel Service, Inc.public domain
149 F.Supp.2d 1011 (2001) Richard DICKIESON, Plaintiff, v. DER TRAVEL SERVICE, INC., a Delaware corporation; Der Travel Service, Inc., a California Corporation; Heinz Wesner, Barbara Schmidt, and Deutsche Bahn, Inc., Defendants. No. 01 C 0339. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 9, 2001. *1012
REV. DR. MITCH RANDALL v. LINDEL FIELDSpublic domain
OSCN Found Document:REV. DR. MITCH RANDALL, et al. v. LINDEL FIELDS, et al. REV. DR. MITCH RANDALL, et al. v. LINDEL FIELDS, et al.2025 OK 91Case Number: 123237Decided: 12/16/2025THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2025 OK 91, __ P.3d __ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Randal Andersen v. Dhl Retirement Pension Planpublic domain
OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: The “anti-cutback” rule of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1054(g), prohibits any amendment of an employee benefits plan that would reduce a participant’s “accrued benefit.” Our question is whether Defendants’ (collectively, “DHL”) decision to eliminate Plaintiffs’ right to tran
In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigationpublic domain
754 F.Supp.2d 1208 (2010) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. UNINTENDED ACCELERATION MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This document relates to: All personal liability/wrong death cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. December 9, 2010. *1211 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton
IN RE: Administrative Suspension Pursuant to Rule 219 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcementpublic domain
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi
In re Suspensions of Att'yspublic domain
Cite as 2015 Ark. 200 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSIONS OF Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On May 14, 2014, we held unconstitutional former Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar to the extent the former rule provided for the suspension of attorneys
Aquifer Science v. Verhinespublic domain
Office of the Director New Mexico Compilation 2023.04.13 Commission '00'06- 08:28:46 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2023-NMCA-020 Filing Date: December 15, 2022 No. A-
In Re Toyota Motor Corp.public domain
785 F.Supp.2d 883 (2011) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation. This Document Relates To: All Foreign Plaintiffs' Economic Loss Cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 8, 2011. *888 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
515 F.Supp.2d 25 (2007) Deborah D. PETERSON, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple (Dec.), et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 01-2094 (RCL), 01-2684(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 7, 2007. *26
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Able v. Vulcan Materials Co.public domain
KUHN, J. 14Plaintiffs-appellants, Leslie Dillon and his major children, April and Matthew, (collectively the Dillons), appeal the trial court’s judgment entered in conformity with a jury verdict awarding $5,225.00 in general and special damages to Leslie Dillon against defendants, Vulcan Materials Company (Vulcan) and Industrial Coating Contractors, Inc. (ICC) for his exposure to a chemical release, which occurred at the Vulca
Mitchell v. Statepublic domain
136 P.3d 671 (2006) 2006 OK CR 20 Alfred Brian MITCHELL, Appellant v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. D-2002-1427. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. May 30, 2006. Gina Walker, Eugenia Bauman, Anythony Sykes, Assistant Public Defenders, Oklahoma County P.D.'s Office, Oklahoma City, OK, attorneys for defendant at trial. Richard Win
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams
Elishah Sawyers, Pax Crate & Freight, Inc. and Robin Sawyers v. Marc Carter and Sally Carterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-14-00870-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/8/2015 12:33:22 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE