Cases

PLAGER, Circuit Judge. At issue in this appeal from judgments of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia1 is entitlement to a portion of some $2.9 billion recovered by the United States. The money was recovered from producers and resellers of crude oil pursuant to a statutory scheme authorizing such recoveries. See Economic Stabilization Act Amendments of 1971, Sect

SCHALL, Circuit Judge. Paul C. Elliott appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Paul C. Elliott v. Department of Energy, No. H-94-1736 (S.D.Tex. Mar. 20, 1995), affirming a remedial order (“RO”) of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”), Concord Petroleum Cor

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2954 MICHELLE FITZGERALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RONCALLI HIGH SCHOOL, INC. and ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF INDIANAPOLIS, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2954 MICHELLE FITZGERALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RONCALLI HIGH SCHOOL, INC. and ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF INDIANAPOLIS, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Clarence Cooper brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several prison officials including Daniel Scott. Cooper alleged that Scott infringed his due process rights when he denied Cooper’s request for a continuance of a disciplinary hearing. Cooper had requested the continuance so he could gather witnesses for his defense. Befor

Opinion THOMPSON, J. Orange County Social Services Agency (SSA) sought to remove Z.G. and I.L. (Children) from the custody of their parents (Parents), C.G. (Mother) and H.L. (Father), after Children’s sibling, H.L., Jr. (Junior), died. The juvenile court found Parents’ “neglect” was a cause of Junior’s death. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 300, subd. (1), 361.5

Opinion FYBEL, J.— INTRODUCTION The federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 mandated that states establish accountability systems, requiring that all schools make “adequate *213 yearly progress” (AYP). (Pub.L. No. 107-110 (Jan. 8, 2002) 115 Stat. 1425.)

117 F.3d 538 CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Long IslandLighting Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Pacific Gasand Electric Company, San Diego Gas and Electric Company,Southern California Edison Company, Champion InternationalCorporation, Federal Paper Board Company, Inc.,International Paper Company, and Weyerhauser Company,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Hazel R. O'LEARY, Secretary of Energy, and George B.

122 Cal.Rptr.2d 866 (2002) 100 Cal.App.4th 1181 ROSA S., Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Orange County, Respondent; Orange County Social Services Agency et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. G030556. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three. August 5, 2002. As Modified August 20, 2002.

Opinion O’LEARY, P. J. Fabian L. (Father) challenges the termination of reunification services at the six-month review hearing, regarding his three-year-old daughter A.L. He asserts there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court’s finding that as an incarcerated parent he failed to make substantive progress in his court-ordered treatment plan and the court abused its discretion in terminating reu

365 B.R. 347 (2007) In re Nancy R. EWING and Daniel J. Ewing, Debtors. TD BankNorth, N.A., Plaintiff v. Nancy R. Ewing and Daniel J. Ewing, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 03-18490-RS. Adversary No. 05-1562. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts. March 29, 2007. Michelle L. Doucette, Peter G. Shaheen, Shaheen, Guerrera & O'Leary LLC, North Andover, MA,

163 Cal.App.4th 80 (2008) THE TJX COMPANIES, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY, Respondent; SEAN CALDWELL, Real Party in Interest. Nos. G038807, G039040. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three. May 22, 2008. As modified June 6, 2008. *82 Cooley Godward

Filed 9/30/21; Certified for publication 10/26/21 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE K.L., Plaintiff and Respondent, G059109 v. (Super. Ct. No. 18P001978) R.H.,

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On February 6, 2014, the Plaintiff 545 Halsey Lane Properties, LLC (the “Plaintiff’) commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenging two decisions by the Defendant Southampton Town Planning Board (the “Planning Board”) involving conditional approvals of the Plaintiffs applications for a building permit for the construction of a barn an

840 N.E.2d 1174 (2005) 217 Ill.2d 221 298 Ill.Dec. 739 BIG SKY EXCAVATING, INC., et al., Appellees, v. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY et al., Appellants. No. 99380. Supreme Court of Illinois. December 1, 2005. *1177 Lance Callis, John Papa, of Callis, Papa, Jackstadt, Szewczyk, Ron

412 F.3d 1088 Luis L. ARMENTERO, Petitioner-Appellant,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 02-55368. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 7, 2004. Filed June 21, 2005. Marc Van Der Hout and Megan Ferstenfeld-Torres, Van De

Opinion O’LEARY, J. Facts Marci S., a married woman, engaged in a brief sexual relationship with Mark L. in late December 2000, during which they conceived a child. A petition to dissolve Marci’s marriage had been filed in January 1997, but she had not obtained a final judgment of dissolution. The child, named Alexander, was born in September 2000, and Marci immediately relinquished

OPINION OF THE COURT Graffeo, J. In this petition to modify a Family Court third-party visitation order, the grandparents appeal from an Appellate Division order granting the parents’ request to terminate visitation based on a change in circumstances since issuance of the initial order. Because we agree with the Appellate Division that terminating visitation is in the child’s best interest, we affirm.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE COMPOSECURE, L.L.C., ) ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 12524-VCL ) CARDUX, LLC f/k/a AFFLUENT CARD, LLC, ) ) Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE COMPOSECURE, L.L.C., ) ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 12524-VCL ) CARDUX, LLC f/k/a AFFLUENT CARD, LLC, ) ) Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION