Cases

OPINION BY LAZARUS, J.: Pearl Mary Potts (“Potts”), mother of Julie Ann Potts (“Julie”), deceased, and administratrix of her estate, appeals from the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County, granting Step By Step, Inc.’s (“Step By Step”) motion for judgment on the pleadings. After careful review, we reverse and remand. Julie, a non-ambulatory, non-verbal 21 year-ol

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Hieda A. Keeler seeks to appeal the district court’s order permitting the substitution of defense counsel, denying her motion for appointment of counsel, and various other issues. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), a

190 F.Supp.2d 911 (2001) Patsy BLACKWELL, et al. Plaintiffs v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY F/K/A/ New England Mutual Life Insurance Company; Fulton A. Jordan, Jr. D/B/A/ Jordan & Associates, et al. Defendants No. CIV.A. 301CV523WS. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. December 28, 2001. *912

(2008) William K. LUMSDEN, Personal Representative of the Estate of Jamie Marie Lumsden, deceased; Candace Michelle Lee; Melanie L. Ritter; Michael M. Clark; and William B. Wilson, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 7:06-CV-60-F. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division. May 7, 2008. ORDER JAME

348 S.W.3d 465 (2011) KIA MOTORS CORPORATION and Kia Motors America, Inc., Appellants, v. Lawrence RUIZ (Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Andrea Ruiz), Shenequa Ruiz, Christopher Ruiz, and Suzanna Ruiz, Appellees. No. 05-10-00198-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. August 5, 2011. *469 Scott P. Stolley, Rich

Opinion ROBIE, Acting P. J. — With our apologies to T.S. Eliot, it appears that this is how more than a decade of contentious litigation over the quantification settlement agreement ends, “[n]ot with a bang, but a whimper,” 1 as the County of Imperial (the County) and the Imperial County Air Pollution

TRANSFER ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman. Before the Panel:* Before the Panel are three dockets involving allegations of defects in various models of pelvic surgical mesh products manufactured by three groups of manufacturers.1 Plaintiffs in almost twenty actions before the Panel have moved pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, to centralize all MDL

6 A.3d 238 (2010) CML V, LLC, individually and derivatively on behalf of JetDirect Aviation Holdings, LLC, Plaintiff, v. John BAX, Gregory S. Campbell, Louis Cappelli, Jane Garvey, Steven M. Hankin, Paul M. Harrington, Donald Hebb, Jeffrey P. Kelly, James W. Marley, Robert P. Pinkas, Peter Sinatra, Stephanie Zimmerman, and JetDirect Aviation Holdings, LLC, Defendants, and JetDirect Aviation Holdings, LLC, Nominal Defendant.

JABAR, J. [¶ 1] This matter, like the matter of Edwards v. Blackman, 2015 ME 165, 129 A.3d 971, concerns property rights in certain oceanfront lots located in the Coopers Beach neighborhood in Owls Head. In this matter, Beverly and David Gravison appeal from a judgment entered by the Superior Court (Knox County, Hjelm, J.) denying the Gravis

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket No. 216) EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Shawna Wilkins-Jones filed suit against the County of Alameda (“County”) on March 18, 2008, for violations of the California Disabled Persons Act (“CDPA”) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). She alleged that she was denied acc

321 B.R. 776 (2005) In re ALLEGHENY HEALTH, EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION, Allegheny University of the Health Sciences, Allegheny University Medical Practices, Allegheny Hospitals, Centennial and Allegheny University Hospitals-East, Debtors. William J. Scharffenberger, As Chapter 11 Trustee of Allegheny Health, Education and Research Foundation, Movant, v. Michelle Kirkland, Respondent. Nos. 98-25773-MBM to 98-25777-

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/09/2023 09:05 AM CDT - 815 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 31 Nebraska Appellate Reports STATE v. WYRICK Cite as 31 Neb. App. 815 State of Nebraska,

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2016 ME 35 Docket: Kno-14-437 Argued: June 18, 2015 Decided: March 1, 2016 Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, MEAD, GORMAN, and JABAR, JJ. BEVERLY A. GRAVISON et al. v. CALVERT M. FISHER et al. JABAR, J. [¶1] This matter, like the matter of

SMITH, Circuit Judge. Jeffrey Scott Sherman appeals from the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment to Rinchem Company, Inc. (“Rinchem”) on Sherman’s defamation claim. Rinchem had fired Sherman after he allegedly lied in the course of Rinchem’s investigation of complaints about his behavior. Sherman disputes Rinc

19-2155 In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020) Docket No. 19-2155 IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY

(2007) NATIONAL FEDERATION OF the BLIND, the National Federation of the Blind of California, on behalf of their members, and Bruce F. Sexton, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant. No. C 06-1802 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. October 2, 2007. MEMORANDUM & ORDER

21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG

J-E02003-24 J-E02004-24 2024 PA Super 192 MICHAEL D. TOTH AND LINAWATI : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF TOTH : PENNSYLVANIA : : v. : : : BRYAN E. TOTH, EUGENE W. TOTH, : MARIE TOTH, AND LEARNING : No. 266 WD

ORDER SCOTT 0. WRIGHT, Chief Judge. Pending before the Court are two issues left to be resolved in this case. First is the issue of damages under the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 count against the Highway Commission. At the trial in September, 1983, the jury returned verdicts in favor of the class and against the Highway Commission. The question is whether the doctrine of sovereign immunity precludes such damages und

Carroll J. Bellis and Mildred Bellis, Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, RespondentBellis v. CommissionerDocket No. 6873-70United States Tax Court