Cases

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE ALLOY delivered the opinion of the court: Robert and Irene Schomer appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Will County denying their petition for the adoption of the minors Lisa and Andrew Scheidt and granting to Charles Scheidt, Sr., and Rose Scheidt the guardianship of the person and guardianship of the estate of Lisa and Andrew Scheidt. During

999 F.Supp. 1037 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. LORANTFFY CARE CENTER, et al., Defendants. No. 5:97 CV 295. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 24, 1998. *1038 *1039 Barbara A. Burr, Gavin C. Dowell, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for United

MICHEL, Circuit Judge. PPG Industries, Inc. appeals the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade holding (1) that substantial evidence supports the United States International Trade Administration’s (ITA) determination that the parties to the suspension agreement did not receive prohibited countervailable Certifi

928 F.2d 1568 13 ITRD 1065 PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee,Vitro Flotado, S.A. and Vidrio Plano de Mexico, S.A., Defendants. No. 88-1175. United States Court of Appeals,Federal Circuit. March 22, 1991.Rehearing Denied April 17, 1991.Suggestion for Rehearing In BancDeclined

[Cite as Auth v. Indus. Physical Capability Servs., Inc., 2017-Ohio-1268.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) RICHARD J. AUTH C.A. No. 28024 Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT

543 F.Supp.2d 70 (2008) IN DEFENSE OF ANIMALS, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Defendants. Civil Action No. 04-1571 (CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 14, 2008. *74 William James Spriggs, Spriggs & Hollingsworth, Washington, DC, for Pl

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. This Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) case was brought against the National Institutes of Health and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (collectively, “NIH”) by In Defense of Animals (“IDA”) seeking information related to approximately 260 chimpanzees located as the Alamogordo Primate Facility (“APF”) in New Mexico. On March 31, 2007, the C

589 N.W.2d 624 (1999) 1999 SD 27 In re Request of Governor William J. JANKLOW for an Advisory Opinion Concerning the Interpretation Of South Dakota Constitution Article IV, Section 4. No. 20920. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Request Received February 22, 1999. Decided February 25, 1999. *625 TO H

Unified Judicial System Formatting provided courtesy of State Bar of South Dakotaand South Dakota Continuing Legal Education, Inc.222 East Capitol Ave.Pierre, SD 57501-2596 IN RE REQUEST OF GOVERNOR WILLIAM J. JANKLOWFOR AN ADVISORY OPINION CONCERNING THE INTERPRETATIONOF SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE IV, SECTION 4 South Dakota Supreme C

527 F.Supp.2d 23 (2007) IN DEFENSE OF ANIMALS, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Defendants. Civil Action No. 04-1571 (CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 12, 2007. *24 *25

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0069p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID KRIEGER, ANDREW KRIEGER, JAMES FOR PUBLICATION SPERLING, and MARGARET SPERLING, on September 7, 2023 Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly 9:05 a.m. Si

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. At issue in this case is whether petitioner, a biological *655stranger to a child who is properly in the custody of his biological mother, has standing to seek visitation with the child under Domestic Relations Law § 70. Petitioner relies on both her established relationship with the child and her alleged agreement wi

162 B.R. 748 (1993) In re Michele THOMPSON, Debtor. Michael F. MERRITT, Plaintiff, v. Michele G. THOMPSON, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 91-20648. Adv. No. 91-2042. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D. Flint. December 14, 1993. *749 Robert Detweiler, Howell, MI, for plaintiff. Dani K. Liblang, Bloomfield Hil

89 Ill. App.3d 92 (1980) 411 N.E.2d 554 In re ADOPTION OF LISA M. SCHEIDT et al., Minors. — (ROBERT G. SCHOMER et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. LISA M. SCHEIDT et al., Respondents-Appellees.) — In re GUARDIANSHIP OF LISA MARIE SCHEIDT et al., Minors. — (CHARLES H. SCHEIDT et al., Petitioners-Appellees, v. CURTIS LEADINGHAM et al., Respondents-Appellants.) No. 79-989. I

Opinion BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J. When an indigent person has been ordered to show cause why he or she should not be found in contempt and punished for alleged disobedience of an order to pay child support, and the potential punishment includes a possible jail sentence, must the county provide an attorney, at public expense, to represent the indigent citee? We hold that it must. The Santa

2 Cal.App.4th 1686 (1992) 5 Cal. Rptr.2d 7 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY, Respondent; DIAN L. RODRIGUEZ, Real Party in Interest. Docket No. H008792. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. January 29, 1992. *1688 COUNSEL Steven M. Woodside, Co