Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Miguel Sexton”
MIGUEL NAVA v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MIGUEL NAVA, DOC #H40801, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v.
Nava v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. KELLY, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
724 F.Supp.2d 1228 (2010) Miguel J. LARACH and Great American Corporation, Plaintiff, v. STANDARD CHARTERED BANK INTERNATIONAL (AMERICAS) LIITED and Stanchart Securities International, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 09-21178-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. July 2, 2010. *1230 Carlos Francisco Concepci
United States v. DiCristinapublic domain
STRAUB, Circuit Judge: The United States appeals from an August 21, 2012 order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Jack B. Weinstein, Judge) entering a post-verdict judgment of acquittal in favor of Defendant-Appellee Lawrence DiCristina, setting aside the guilty verdict on one count of violating the Illegal Gambling Business Act (the “IGBA”
Abel Verdon Construction v. Riverapublic domain
348 S.W.3d 749 (2011) ABEL VERDON CONSTRUCTION and Acuity Insurance, Appellants, v. Miguel A. RIVERA; Honorable Otto Daniel Wolff, Administrative Law Judge; Workers' Compensation Board; and Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Appellees. No. 2010-SC-000744-WC. Supreme Court of Kentucky. August 25, 2011. As Corrected August 30, 2011.
Rivera v. Statepublic domain
545 S.E.2d 105 (2001) 247 Ga. App. 713 RIVERA v. The STATE. No. A00A2086. Court of Appeals of Georgia. January 29, 2001. Certiorari Denied June 12, 2001. Lee Sexton, for appellant. Robert E. Keller, Dist. Atty., Staci L. Guest, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee. SMITH, Presiding Judge. A Clayton County jury
State v. Morice W.public domain
SHELDON, J. The defendant, Morice W., appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered against him after a jury trial, on charges of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (1) 1 and assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-61 (a) (2).
State v. Mendozapublic domain
207 P.3d 1072 (2009) STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Miguel D. MENDOZA, Appellant. No. 98,998. Court of Appeals of Kansas. May 22, 2009. *1074 Michelle Davis, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, for appellant. David E. Yoder, county attorney, and Stephen N. Six, attorney general, for appellee. Before RULON, C.J., ELL
State v. Norman P.public domain
PRESCOTT, J. The defendant, Norman P., appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of three counts of sexual assault in a spousal relationship in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70b, one count of assault of an elderly person in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60b, and one count of assault of an elderly person in the third degree in
Aldan v. World Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND TO MODIFY THE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. [[Image here]] ¶ 1 This slip-and-fall case is before the court on the plaintiffs’ second motion to amend their complaint, filed after the expiration of the deadline for amendments in the case management schedulin
Frame v. City of Arlingtonpublic domain
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs are persons with disabilities who depend on motorized wheelchairs for mobility. They allege that the City of Arlington, by failing to make the City’s curbs, sidewalks, and certain parking lots ADA-compliant, has violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act. The district court dismissed their complaint on the basis that their claims were barred by
State v. Ibanezpublic domain
31 P.3d 830 (2001) 201 Ariz. 56 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Miguel Angel IBANEZ, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR 00-0821 RT. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. September 18, 2001. *831 Janet Napolitano, Attorney General, by Randall M. Howe, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section and Cari McC
Frame Ex Rel. Castro v. City of Arlingtonpublic domain
OPINION ON REHEARING The plaintiffs are persons with disabilities who depend on motorized wheelchairs *480for mobility. They allege that the City of Arlington, by failing to make the City’s curbs, sidewalks, and certain parking lots ADA-compliant, has violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act. The district court dismissed their co
Christopher Brown v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
11/14/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs October 4, 2022 CHRISTOPHER BROWN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 13-05989 J. Robert Carter, Jr., Judge ________________________________
State of Tennessee v. Marcus Roshone Perrypublic domain
04/22/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 11, 2022 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARCUS ROSHONE PERRY Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2017-A-193 Steve R. Dozier, Judge ___________________________________
Craig Lyons v. Conagra Foods Packaged Foods Lpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I
Texas Drydock, Inc. v. Davispublic domain
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING In response to the motion for rehearing filed by Texas Drydock, Inc., we withdraw *Page 921 our opinion of August 26, 1999, and substitute the following in its place. Texas Drydock, Inc., appeals from a judgment in favor of Louis Davis, following a jury trial on Davis' personal injury claim. Davis suffered an injury while working for his employer, Crumpler Shipbuilders, Inc., on a cherry pick
Chavez v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLCpublic domain
Office of the Director New Mexico 08:13:29 2022.02.15 Compilation '00'07- Commission IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2022-NMSC-006 Filing Date: November 15, 2021 No. S-1-SC-37489 AMADO CHAVEZ, RAMONA HERNANDEZ, TODD LOPEZ, as Personal Representative of the Estate of EDGAR CHAVE
State of Tennessee v. Charvaris Donte Newsompublic domain
05/04/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 9, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHARVARIS DONTE NEWSOM Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2018-B-768 Steve R. Dozier, Judge ___________________________________
State v. Montanopublic domain
973 P.2d 861 (1998) 126 N.M. 609 1999-NMCA-023 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence MONTANO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 18563. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. December 16, 1998. Certiorari Denied January 29, 1999. *862 Tom Udall, Attorney General, Marg