Cases

KING, Circuit Judge: Debtor-plaintiff Living Benefits Asset Management, L.L.C., brought this adversary proceeding against Kestrel Aircraft Co. for breach of contract. Living Benefits alleges that Kestrel failed to pay almost $ 900,000 owed for services that Living Benefits provided Kestrel to help it collateralize a corporate debt offering with life settlements. Following a bench trial,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA CONCETTA RIZZIO, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. SURPASS SENIOR LIVING LLC, ET AL., Defendants/Appellants. No. CV-20-0058-PR Filed August 17, 2021 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Honorable Sherry K

620 F.3d 584 (2010) In re NASHVILLE SENIOR LIVING, LLC; Anderson Senior Living Property, LLC; Charlotte Oakdale Property, LLC; Greensboro Oakdale Property, LLC; Mt. Pleasant Oakdale I Property, LLC; Mt. Pleasant Oakdale II Property, LLC, et al., Debtors. The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, fka The Official Committees of Tenants in Common Investors, Appellant, v. Anderson Senior Living Property, LLC; Charlotte Oakdale Property, LLC;

Opinion ELIA, J. Joseph R. Erlach (appellant) appeals from a judgment of dismissal of his complaint against Sierra Asset Servicing, LLC (Sierra), entered after the trial court sustained Sierra’s demurrer without leave to amend. Appellant contends that it was error for the trial court to determine that his residential lease was void and that he was a squatte

USCA11 Case: 22-13642 Document: 54-1 Date Filed: 09/11/2024 Page: 1 of 18 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13642 ____________________ In re: GEORGE P. WAGNER, III,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 503 AUDREY R. EVANS, Bankruptcy Judge. Now before the Court is an Application for Payment of Administrative Expenses Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 503 (Dkt. #251) (“Expense Application”) filed by Thomas S. Streetman on behalf of Renee S. Williams (the “Southwest Trustee”),

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF AUDREY R. EVANS, Bankruptcy Judge. On July 25, 2013, the Court heard Pinewood Enterprises, L.C.’S Motion for Relief From the Automatic Stay (the “Motion for Relief’) filed by Pinewood Enterprises, L.C. (“Pinewood”) (Dkt. # 106); Trustee Renee S. Williams’s Objection to Pinewood Enterprises L.C.’s Motion for Relief From Stay filed by Renee Williams

ORDER APPROVING FEE APPLICATION AUDREY R. EVANS, Bankruptcy Judge. On October 2, 2013, the Court heard the Amended Final Application for Payment of Attorneys’ Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses filed by Smith, AMns & Gladden, P.A. (“Smith Akins”) (Dkt. #250) (the “Fee Application”) which amended the Final Application for Compensation for Payment of Attorneys’ Fees and Reimbursemen

ORDER APPROVING APPLICATION TO EMPLOY ATTORNEY AUDREY R. EVANS, Bankruptcy Judge. Now before the Court is the Application to Employ Attorney (the “Application”) filed by the Debtor-in-possession seeking to hire the law firm of Smith Akins, P.A. and the firm of Welch, Brewer and Hudson, LLC as counsel for the Debtor in this bankruptcy proceeding. This application was filed June 13, 2012, a

Stacey G. C. Jernigan, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge The Chapter 7 Debtor, Scott Brei (the "Plaintiff/Debtor"),1 filed the above-referenced adversary proceeding (the "Adversary Proceeding") on June 15, 2018, seeking a declaratory judgment that three, separate liens on his real property located at 4509 Mockingbird Lane in Highland Park, Dallas County, Texas (the "Mockingbird Property"), which he claims as his T

407 B.R. 222 (2009) In re NASHVILLE SENIOR LIVING, LLC, et al., Debtors. Official Committees of Unsecured Creditors, Appellants, v. Anderson Senior Living Property, LLC, et al., Appellees. BAP Nos. 08-8087, 08-8091, 08-8094, 08-8089, 08-8092, 08-8095, 08-8090, 08-8093. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit. June 11, 2009.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion and Supporting Brief to Determine That This Matter Proceed as a Class Action, filed January 6, 2014 (Doe. 194)(“Motion”). The Court held a two-part class certification hearing with its first portion on March 10,11, and 12, 2014, and its second portion on April 3 and 4, 2014.

WELLS, Judge (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. Even accepting the majority’s finding that Abundant Living Citi Church, Inc. was denied due process, I would nevertheless affirm what amounted to entry of dismissal with prejudice of appellant’s counter-claims for specific performance, and breach, of an oral contract for the sale of real property, as I find that appellant has not alleged and cannot pro

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed December 28, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00071-CV LENDINGHOME FUNDING CORPORATION, Appellant V. TUESDAY REAL ESTATE, LLC, KEVIN MILLER, HARVA DALE MILLER, AND ROXANE L. MILLER, Appellees On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Co

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MARY J. MILLER (deceased) and DEBORAH MILLER, Defendant-BeloW/Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. C.A. N15A-03-009 AML ONIX SILVERSIDE, LLC, t/a CADIA REHABILITATION SILVERSIDE, Plaintiff-BeloW/Appellee and Cross-Appellant. Subrnitted: May 10, 2016 Decided: August 26, 2016 ORDER On appeal from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas: AFFIRMED, in part, and REVERSED, in part. This is an appeal from a post-trial decision of the Court of Common P

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ERSTE ASSET MANAGEMENT GMBH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-1191-LWW BERNARDO HEES, ALEXANDRE ) BEHRING, JORGE PAULO LEMANN, ) MARCEL HERRMANN TELLES, ) PAULO BASILIO, DAVID KNOPF, ) EDUARDO PELLEISSONE, 3G ) CAPITAL, INC., 3G CAPITAL LTD., 3G ) GLOBAL FOOD

*153 MEMORANDUM YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case illustrates the value of a jury-trial in an adjudicatory system apparently devoted almost entirely to efficiency. Its broad outlines are briefly limned. The well-prepared plaintiff brought a motion for summary judgment. Its outcome was all but a foregone con

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded with instructions by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge WYNN joined. GREGORY, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellee Elderberry of Weber City, LLC (“Elderberry”) filed this civil action in the Western District of Virginia

ACCEPTED 14-15-00004-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/28/2015 8:27:19 AM