Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) MONTE MILLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-cv-00382 (TSC)(AK) ) CA

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. Yvette Miller (“Plaintiff’), on behalf of minor plaintiff J.W., brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of the decision by Carolyn W. Colvin (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”)—acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”)—denying J.W.’s application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). Upon consideratio

ORDER Honorable Bruce G. Macdonald, United States Magistrate Judge Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Brief — Social Security (“Opening Brief’) (Doc. 15). Defendant filed her Brief (“Response”) (Doc. 16), and Plaintiff filed his Plaintiffs Reply Brief — Social Security (“Reply”) (Doc. 17). Plaintiff brings this cause of action for review of the final decision of the Commissioner for Social S

ORDER LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge. This Court referred the case to United States Magistrate for the purpose of issuing a Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge has recommended that the Commissioner’s denial -of benefits be reversed and remanded for reconsideration pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four. A sentence four remand is proper when the district court 'mak

DECISION AND ORDER MICHAEL A. TELESCA, District Judge. I. Introduction Represented by counsel, Harry J. Miller, Jr. (“Plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, challenging the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security In

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Terrie A. Miller (“Plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) seeking review of the final decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting ' Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), denying Plaintiffs application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). (Dkt. 1). Pla

OPINION AND ORDER RUDY LOZANO, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision denying Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) to Plaintiff, Cathy S. Miller. For the reasons set forth below, the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion pursuant to se

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LEONARD T. STRAND, United States Magistrate Judge. Dennis Miller seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying his application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3). Miller contends the administrative record (“AR”) does not contain substan

247 S.W.3d 24 (2008) Elmus MILLER and James Miller, Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Monica COLVIN, Defendant/Appellant. No. ED 89525. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. March 4, 2008. Judy Freiberg, UAW Legal Service Plan, Sunset Hills, MO, for Appellant. Daniel Patrick Boyle, Florissant, MO, for Respondent. Before MARY K. HOFF, P.J

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Charles Miller appeals the district court’s 1 judgment upholding the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”). The Commissioner determined that Miller was not disabled and therefore not entitled to disability insurance benefits and supplemental se

OPINION AND ORDER HENRY COKE MORGAN, JR., Senior District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Jeffery Pearson’s (“Plaintiff”) Objections to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Magistrate Judge”). Doc. 17. For the reasons explained below, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs objections after a de novo review and, finding no clear error in t

AMENDED ORDER David G. Campbell, United States District Judge Pursuant to Plaintiffs unopposed motion to amend (Doe. SO). Plaintiff Robert Glenn Kline seeks review under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, which denied him disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under sections 216(i), 223(d), and 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Soc

ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge. This cause comes before the Court on cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. A hearing was held on these matters before the undersigned on May 13, 2015, at Raleigh, North Carolina. For the reasons discussed below, the decision of the Acting Commissioner is reversed and this matter is remanded for an award of benefits. BACKGR

ORDER ROBERT G. DOUMAR, Senior District Judge. In the instant suit, Plaintiff challenges the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration to deny his application for Disability Insurance Benefits. Plaintiff claims complete disability under the Social Security Act starting on March, 23 2010. This matter comes before the Court on Robert Nichols’ (“Plaintiff’) Objections to M

ORDER REVERSING DISABILITY DECISION AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER BLACKBURN, United States District Judge. The matter before me is plaintiffs Complaint [# l],1 filed July 31, 2013, seeking *1176review of the Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiffs claim for disability insurance benefits under

KAREN R. BAKER, Justice, dissenting. The majority holds that because Ark. Code Ann. § 5-4-702(a) (Supp.2011) requires a mandatory imposition of a term of imprisonment, the circuit court erred by suspending Colvin’s sentence, and therefore, Colvin’s suspended sentence was an illegal sentence. In reaching their conclusion, the majority ignores our long-standing case law on pena

DECISION AND ORDER VICTOR E. BIANCHINI, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In August of 2009, Plaintiff Derek J. Giancola applied for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits and Child’s Disability Benefits1 under the Social Security Act. The Commissioner of Social Security denied the applications. Plaintiff, repre

727 S.E.2d 232 (2012) 315 Ga. App. 486 COLVIN v. CHRISLEY, et al. No. A12A0334. Court of Appeals of Georgia. April 11, 2012. *233 William Leonard Colvin, Roswell, for Colvin. Hayden Robert Pace, Atlanta, for Chrisley, et al. MIKELL, Presiding Judge. Two lawsuits were filed in Fulton Co

MEMORANDUM OPINION DAVE WHALIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Scott J. Hartman has filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to obtain judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security that denied his current applications for disability insurance benefits (DIB) and supplemental security income (SSI).1 Hartman applied for D

OPINION Opinion by Justice Moseley A jury convicted Cory Martin Colvin of aggravated sexual assault of a child, and he was sentenced to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment. On appeal, Colvin argues that the trial court erred (1) by improperly excusing a juror and replacing her with an alternate juror, (2) by admitting extraneous-offense e