Cases

Donald L. Corbin, Justice. This is the second time that Petitioners Centerpoint Energy, Inc., Centerpoint Energy Resources Corp. (f/k/a Reliant Energy Resources Corp.), Entex Gas Marketing Co., Centerpoint Energy Field Services, Inc., and Centerpoint Energy Pipeline Services, Inc. (collectively Center-point), are before this court seeking an extraordinary writ to stop the Miller County Circuit

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Introduction. Pending before the court is Defendant En-tex’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry # 28). Entex seeks dismissal of this action for insufficiency of service of process under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5). Plaintiff John C. Boltes (“Boltes”) filed no response to Entex’s motion. Therefore, the motion is

DISSENT FROM THE DENIAL OF REHEARING GALLAGHER, J., ad hoc, and GONZALES, J., ad hoc, dissenting. | .With all due deference to the opinion of the majority, we respectfully dissent from the denial of rehearing for the reasons that follow. The majority opinion makes a monumental change in Louisiana tort law by applying the concept of res ipsa loquitur to an ordinary n

Robert L. Brown, Justice. Petitioners Centerpoint Energy, Inc. (hereinafter “Centerpoint”); Centerpoint Energy Resources Corp. (f/k/a Reliant EnergyResources Corp.) (hereinafter “CERC”); Entex Gas Marketing Company (hereinafter “EGMC”); Centerpoint Energy Field Services, Inc.; and Centerpoint Energy PipeHne Services, Inc. (hereinafter referred to coHectively as “Centerpoint petitioners”), have

589 F.2d 603 191 U.S.App.D.C. 80 MIDWESTERN GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, Complainant,v.FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co., Foothills Pipe Lines andPan-Alberta Gas Ltd., United Municipal Distributors Group,Northwest Alaskan Pipeline Company, State of Louisiana,Entex, Inc., Louisiana Gas Service, Southwest GasCorporation, Mississippi River Transmissio

702 S.W.2d 266 (1985) Roy H. BRAY, Appellant, v. Kenneth C. SQUIRES, Miller H. Walsh, Jeffrey J. Tompkins, P.C., University Savings Association, Richard Collier, Entex., Inc., and Jackson Hinds, Appellees. No. 01-84-0264-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). November 27, 1985. *267 John D. Payne, Houston, for appell

Judgment rendered August 27, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 56,293-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** JA’QUARRIUS IGNO

SECOND DIVISION MILLER, P. J., MERCIER and COOMER, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. Please refer to the Supreme Court of Georgia Judicial Emergency Order of March 14, 2020 for further

BARNES, Presiding Judge. This appeal involves a discovery dispute about electronic records. The trial court granted the plaintiff’s motion to compel the six defendants to identify which documents they produced responded to each of the plaintiff’s requests to produce. The court also sanctioned the defendants for identifying more than 80 percent of the documents as “Highly Confidential — Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” and awarded

848 F.Supp. 96 (1994) RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. John BONNER, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. H-92-430. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 31, 1994. Francisco G. Medina, Medina & Associates, Houston, TX, Stewart R. Werner, Amarillo, TX, Carolyn P. Perry, Washington, DC, John E. Hubbard, Omaha, NE, Kathleen M. Quinn

PETERS, J. _JjThe defendants in this litigation, Brookshire’s Grocery Company (Brook-shire’s), Richard Cogburn, Deron Floyd, and Allen Hudson, appeal a trial court judgment rendered against them awarding the plaintiff, Esther Gay Melder, $343,331.12 in compensatory damages for injuries she sustained in an accident which occurred in a Natchitoches, Louisiana Brookshire’s grocery store on July 23, 2011. For the following reaso

Opinion issued May 1, 2025 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00501-CV ——————————— LIPPERT COMPONENTS, INC., Appellant V. QUINTON WILLIAMS, App

Judgment rendered March 30, 2022. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 54,262-CA No. 54,263-CA (Consolidated Cases) COURT OF APPEAL S

MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge. |2Plaintiff, Richard Breaux, appeals the granting of summary judgment in favor of defendants, Fresh Start Properties, LLC (“Fresh Start”) and State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., dismissing his suit for personal injuries allegedly sustained while he was working as an electrician on Fresh Start’s property. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. Plaintiff filed suit asserting he injure

RULING ON THE DEFENDANT, PAUL’S, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALFRED V. COVELLO, District Judge. This is an action for damages and equitable relief in which the plaintiff, Amphe-nol Corporation (hereinafter “Amphenol”), claims that the defendant, Richard Paul, breached a non-competition agreement. It is brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1030 et seq., along with tenets concerning breach of contrac

791 F.Supp.2d 550 (2011) Rory Thomas LEE, Plaintiff v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION; Illinois Central Railroad Company; and BFI Waste Services LLC, Defendants. Cause No. 3:10-CV-00392-CWR-LRA. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. May 26, 2011. *551 Benjamin B. Saunders, Carisa German-Oden,

Branch, Judge. Effingham County appeals the denial of its second motion for summary judgment in this breach of contract action brought by Benjamin R. Roach, Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustee for Darrell Morgan. The County applied to this Court for interlocutory appeal, and this Court granted the application, holding that because the trial court rendered a conclusive determination on an issue of sovereign immunity, the trial court

Case: 18-11638 Date Filed: 07/14/2020 Page: 1 of 49 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-11638 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cv-21769-KMW IRINA TESORIERO,

STONE, S. hThe plaintiff, Robert Ryan (“Ryan”), sued Case New Holland, Inc. (“CNH”), claiming that a defect in his used CNH tractor caused a fire that destroyed the tractor, damaged his bam, and damaged property inside the barn. A jury found the tractor was redhibitorily defective and unreasonably dangerous. Ryan was awarded damages and attorney’s fees. For the reasons stated herein, we reverse the trial court’s ruling in pa

Case: 18-11638 Date Filed: 07/14/2020 Page: 1 of 49 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-11638 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cv-21769-KMW IRINA TESORIERO,