Cases

PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _______________ No. 95-3040 ______________ D. C. Docket No. 7263-93 BRADLEY C. MILLER and DIANNE M. MILLER, Petitioners-Appellants, versus COMMISSIONER

HILL, Senior Circuit Judge: This appeal from the Tax Court involves the issue of whether the taxpayers’ election statement under Internal Revenue Code Section 172(b)(3)(C) 1 unequivocally communicated their intent to relinquish the carryback period for both a net operating loss (NOL) and an alternative minimum tax net o

983 F.2d 232 Millerv.Commissioner of IRS* NO. 92-4306 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Jan 08, 1993 1 Appeal From: U.S.T.C. 2

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE LEONARD E. HUTCHINSON; No. 19-60065 SONYA C. HUTCHINSON, Debtors, BAP No. 19-1047 LEONARD E. HUTCHINSON; SONYA C. HUTCHINSON, OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; JAMES SALV

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE LEONARD E. HUTCHINSON; No. 19-60065 SONYA C. HUTCHINSON, Debtors, BAP No. 19-1047 LEONARD E. HUTCHINSON; SONYA C. HUTCHINSON, ORDER AND Plaintiffs-Appellants, AMENDED OPINION v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

172 B.R. 900 (1994) In re Dennis ERICKSON and Nanci Erickson and Dennis Erickson, d/b/a Justin Home Builders, Inc., Dennis Erickson Home Builders and D. Erickson Home Builders, Plaintiffs, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and Minnesota Department of Revenue, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 4-93-744. Adv. No. 4-93-180. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota. Septembe

Affirmed without opinion.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-23-00530-CV Appellant, Bryan Miller// Cross-Appellant, Claudia Miller v. Appellee, Claudia Miller// Cross-Appellee, Bryan Miller FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-FM-21-001119, THE HONORABLE MADELEINE CONNOR, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINI

Case: 18-11398 Document: 00515316589 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/20/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ___________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 18-11398 FILED

300 B.R. 422 (2003) In re Ronald Eugene MILLER and Jennifer Lynn Miller, Debtors. Ronald Eugene Miller and Jennifer Lynn Miller, Plaintiffs, v. Internal Revenue Service, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 00-62869, Adversary No. 02-6086. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. July 11, 2003. *423

253 B.R. 455 (2000) In re William M. MILLER, Debtor. William M. Miller, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, through its Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service; and State of California, through its State Board of Equalization, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 3-89-04281-TC, Adversary No. 00-3-077-TC. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California. October 3, 2000.

MILLETT, Circuit Judge: As a general rule, workers in the United States are taxed to support the payment of social security benefits to the retired and to individuals with disabilities. The expectation is that, having contributed to the national economy while actively employed, those workers will later become eligible beneficiaries rather than supporters of the social security sys

687 F.Supp. 510 (1988) Dorothy HOLLCROFT, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF the TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. Carrie B. LOVE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Defendant. Civ. Nos. S-85-1734 MLS, S-87-838 MLS. United States District Court, E.D. California. June 9, 1988. *511 Dorot

CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Senior Circuit Judge: Petitioner William Miller appeals the district court’s affirmance of a bankruptcy court ruling which concluded that his Chapter 11 plan did not discharge his obligation to pay post-petition, pre-confirmation (“gap period”) interest on taxes owed to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”).1 Miller contends that the IRS must be precluded from challenging the

363 F.3d 999 William M. MILLER, Reorganized Debtor, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, through its Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; State of California, through its State Board of Equalization, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-17073. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 12, 2004. F

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) MILLER V. MILLER NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). RICHARD D. MILLER, APPELLANT, V.

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-12298 BENJAMIN H. MILLER vs. JOANNA ISABELLA MILLER. Middlesex. Septe

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 5, 2011 Decided June 21, 2011 Reissued August 18, 2011 No. 10-1204 INTERMOUNTAIN INSURANCE SERVICE OF VAIL, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AND THOMAS A. DAVIES, TAX MATTERS PARTNER, APPELLEES v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 5, 2011 Decided June 21, 2011 Reissued August 18, 2011 No. 10-1204 INTERMOUNTAIN INSURANCE SERVICE OF VAIL, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AND THOMAS A. DAVIES, TAX MATTERS PARTNER, APPELLEES v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

[Cite as Machen v. Miller, 2024-Ohio-1270.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA S. KAREN MACHEN, : Plaintiff-Appellant/ : Cross-Appellee, Nos. 112453, 112454, and : 112479 v.