Cases

43 F.3d 1483 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Br

ORDER ON SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS JOHN A. HOUSTON, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are the parties’ supplemental briefs on modification of the class definition. After a careful consideration of the briefs and relevant exhibits submitted by the parties, the Court sets forth its decision below. BACKGROUND 1. Factual Backgr

708 F.Supp.2d 616 (2010) Judith FINNICUM, Plaintiff, v. WYETH, INC., Schwarz Pharma, Inc., and Actavis-Elizabeth, L.L.C., Individually and as a Subsidiary of Actavis, Inc. and as Successor to Purepac Pharmaceutical, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:09-CV-785. United States District Court, E.D. Texas. April 28, 2010. William Burton Curtis, Miller Curtis & Wei

719 F.Supp.2d 1340 (2010) Odessa MOSLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WYETH, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-0284-KD-C. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. June 28, 2010. *1342 Thomas Edward Dutton, Pittman, Hooks, Dutton & Hollis, P.C., Birmingham, AL, Alexandra Vanassa Boone, Javier Gonzal

ORDER WILSON, District Judge. Pending is Defendant’s Motion to Strike Expert Testimony Re: Legal Conclusions of Drs. Gueriguian and Sackett1 (a trenchant memorandum, I note with pleasure). Plaintiff has responded.2 Down through the years common law courts have struggled with “opinion” v. “fact” and “legal conclusions.

684 F.Supp.2d 1338 (2010) Jason LEVINE, Plaintiff, v. WYETH INC., et al., Defendants. Case No.: 8:09-cv-854-T-33AEP. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. February 10, 2010. *1340 Daniel J. McGlynn, McGlynn, Glisson, Mouton, Baton Rouge, LA, Jason Richard Fraxedas, Steven R. Maher, The Maher Law Firm, PA, Wi

642 F.Supp.2d 677 (2009) Dennis MORRIS, Plaintiff, v. WYETH, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 1:07-CV-176-R. United States District Court, W. D. Kentucky, Bowling Green Division. February 20, 2009. *679 Chandrika Srinivasan, Michael R. Hance, Hance & Srinivasan, PLLC, Louisville, KY, Daniel J. McGlynn, McGlynn, Glisson & Koc

411 F.Supp.2d 1318 (2006) Patricia A. STAFFORD, Plaintiff, v. WYETH, Defendant. No. CIV-02-1118-L. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. January 26, 2006. *1319 Gregory Sean Jez, Fleming & Associates LLP, Houston, TX, Paul A. Harris, Harris & Coffey PLLC, Oklahoma City, OK, for Plaintiff. A. Paul Murrah, Jr.

613 F.Supp.2d 1056 (2009) Bettye FIELDS, Plaintiff v. WYETH, INC. d/b/a Wyeth; Schwarz Pharma, Inc.; and Teva Pharmaceutical, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 08-2079. United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division. May 11, 2009. *1057 Daniel J. McGlynn, McGlynn & Glisson APLC, Baton Rouge, LA, George R. Wise, Jr.

ORDER VACATING CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDERS D. LOWELL JENSEN, Acting Chairman. Before the entire Panel *: Defendant Wyeth entities1 in these two actions (Hess and Manalo) move, pursuant to Rule 7.4, R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), to vacate the respective portions of our orders conditionally transferring Hess and Manalo to the Eastern

692 F.Supp.2d 453 (2010) WYETH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-230 (JAP). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. February 8, 2010. *454 Donald A. Robinson, Keith J. Miller, Robinson, Wettre & Miller LLC, Newark, NJ, for Plaintiffs. Thomas R. Curtin, George C. J

601 F.Supp.2d 1262 (2009) Susan SCHROCK and Steve Schrock, Plaintiffs, v. WYETH, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. CIV-08-453-M. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. March 11, 2009. Alexandra Vanassa Boone, William Burton Curtis, Miller Curtis & Weisbrod LLP, Dallas, TX, Daniel Julien McGlynn, Patty Ann Trantham, McGlynn Glisson APLC, Baton Rouge, LA, B

(2008) Dennis MORRIS, Plaintiff v. WYETH, INC., et. al., Defendants. Case No. 1:07-CV-176-R. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, Bowling Green Division. October 24, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS B. RUSSELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant PLIVA, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss based on Federal Preemption (D

591 F.3d 613 (2010) In re PREMPRO PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, *614 Sandra Kirkland; Patricia Lawton-Wilson; Monica Lee; Katherine Maiello; Dorothy Mallette; Nola McAdoo; Lillian Meeks; Brenda Nicholson; Joanne Nickel; Barbara Norvell; Reva Orr; Regina Parker; April Patterson; Kathleen Perkinson; Donna Peters; Joanne Peterson; Mary Phillips; Viola Plieseis; Joyce Podhayski; Kathleen Preston; Lydia Ross; Diane S

28 S.W.3d 87 (2000) WYETH-AYERST LABORATORIES COMPANY, et al., Appellants, v. Emilia MEDRANO, Appellee. No. 06-99-00080-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted July 13, 2000. Decided August 7, 2000. *89 Leslie A. Benitez, David C. Duggins, Clark, Thomas & Winters, PC, Austin, Paul W. Gertz, Germer

82 S.W.3d 849 (2002) Erma Rae WOOD, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. WYETH-AYERST LABORATORIES, DIVISION OF AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS; A.H. Robins Company, Appellees. No. 2000-SC-1067-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. August 22, 2002. *850 John R. Shelton, Parker & O'Connell, PLLC, Louisville,

JOINT MEMORANDUM ORDER WM. R. WILSON, JR. and ANN D. MONTGOMERY, District Judges. A. Introduction The primary question in this litigation is whether the plaintiffs developed breast cancer from hormone replacement therapy (HRT) medications. Most plaintiffs received Prempro, a combined hormone replacement therapy (CHRT) consisting of estrogen and progesterone. The parties have already litiga

244 P.3d 765 (2010) WYETH, A Delaware Corporation, and its Divisions and Subsidiaries; and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and its Divisions and Subsidiaries, Appellants, v. Arlene ROWATT; Wendell Forrester, Duly Appointed Special Administrator for the Estate of Pamela Forrester; and Jeraldine Scofield, Respondents. No. 51234. Supreme Court of Nevada. Novem

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION SCOTT DUBE, and ) DAWN DUBE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) vs.

739 F.Supp.2d 895 (2010) Georgia TORKIE-TORK, Plaintiff, v. WYETH, Defendant. No. 1:04cv945. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. October 4, 2010. *896 David Michael Kopstein, Kopstein & Perilman, Fairfax Station, VA, for Plaintiff. Ryan Thomas Scarborough, Edward John Bennett, Williams &am;