Cases

67 Wn. App. 120 (1992) 834 P.2d 36 LAURIE MILLER, Appellant, v. MICHAEL L. YATES, ET AL, Respondents. No. 11176-8-III. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three. July 7, 1992. Jeff B. Crollard of Evergreen Legal Services, for appellant. Michael L. Yates, pro se. SWEENEY, J. Laurie Miller sued

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 86-2-02316-9, Robert N. Hackett, Jr., J., entered September 28, 1990. Reversed by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, J., concurred in by Shields, C.J., and Thompson, J. Now published at 67 Wn. App. 120.

PRESCOTT, J. The defendant, John Yates, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion to correct an illegal sentence. The defendant claims on appeal that the court improperly (1) permitted appointed counsel to withdraw without first requiring him to articulate the reasoning behind his determination that there was no sound basis for the motion to correct an illegal s

OPINION Opinion by Justice CARTER. Danny Evert Yates stopped his truck in front of the victim’s home in New Boston, Bowie County, Texas, where he forced the victim into the truck at gunpoint.1 Yates then drove several miles away to a dirt road near the Highway 8 bridge over the Red River. There, Yates sexually assaulted the victim four times. Yates then drove the victim back t

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge FLOYD and Judge ANDERSON joined. DIAZ, Circuit Judge: This case involves claims that Municipal Mortgage & Equity (“MuniMae” or the “Company”), and certain of its officers and directors (collectively, the “MuniMae defendants”), viola

935 N.E.2d 729 (2010) In re the General Power of Attorney of Xenia S. MILLER. In re the J. Irwin Miller Trust Agreement Dated September 25, 1999, as Amended. Hugh Th. Miller, Appellant-Interested-Party, v. William Irwin Miller and Sarla Kalsi, Appellees-Attorneys-in-Fact. No. 03A01-0912-CV-586. Court of Appeals of Indiana. September 30, 2010.

PER CURIAM. Defendants-Appellants, two state university officials, appeal from the district court’s denial of qualified immunity. We have jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal under the qualification of the final judgment rule of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 announced in Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S.

332 B.R. 1 (2005) In re Jennifer Nicol YATES, Debtor. Unified People's Federal Credit Union, Appellant, v. Jennifer Nicol Yates and Michael Dale Yates, Appellees. BAP No. WY-05-015, Bankruptcy No. 04-20069. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit. September 29, 2005. *2 Donald A. Miller of Graves, Miller

155 P.3d 786 (2007) 2007-NMCA-038 Facundo VALDEZ, as Personal Representative, under the New Mexico Wrongful Death Act of Rumaldo Alvarado, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YATES PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 25,305. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. March 22, 2007. *787 Hanratty Law Firm, Kevin

Glickman, Associate Judge: Appellants Chamontae Walker and Corey Yates were indicted with Meeko Carr-away on charges relating to the September 25, 2010, murder of Darrell Hendy. Carra-way, who fired the shots that killed Hendy, pleaded guilty to second-degree murder. Walker and Yates, charged as Carraway’s accomplices in the shooting, went to trial. Walker was convicted of thr

670 S.E.2d 884 (2008) YATES v. CACV OF COLORADO, LLC. No. A08A2288. Court of Appeals of Georgia. December 3, 2008. Cynthia Yates, pro se. Trauner, Cohen & Thomas, Michael J. Cohen, Atlanta, for appellee. BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge. Cynthia Yates appeals from an order affirming an arbitration award against her. However, because the trial cour

Miller, Judge. Following a nonjury trial, Scott Michael Yates was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol to the extent that he was less safe to drive and of weaving over the roadway. On appeal, he claims the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence of his refusal to submit to a state-administered chemical sobriety test and (2) denying his motion to dismiss. We reverse the DUI conviction becau

535 S.E.2d 335 (2000) 244 Ga. App. 333 YATES et al. v. DEAN et al. No. A00A0008. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 7, 2000. John H. Armwood, Marietta, Rita T. Williams, Decatur, for appellants. Harper, Waldon & Craig, Russell D. Waldon, James A. Neuberger, Chambers, Mabry, McClelland & Brooks, Wilbur C. Brooks, Atlanta, for app

Mr. Justice GREENWOOD delivered the opinion of the court. *438In determining this writ of error, it will suffice to use the statement of the nature and result and the statement of the facts of this case from the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, which are adopted by plaintiff in error, in language as follows: “This is an

This is an action in trespass to try title and for damages brought by appellant, Mrs. Addie Miller, surviving wife and devisee of M. C. Miller, who died in 1915, against I. G. Yates and others holding oil and gas leases under Yates. Upon peremptory charge there was verdict and judgment for defendants. The land sued for is in two tracts, each being approximately 625 varas wide from north to south, and 1,900 varas long. On March 15, 1882, certificates numbered 2302 and 2303

O. E. Yates instituted this action against N. B. Miller. Yates alleged that he and J. H. Roden were engaged as partners in the grocery business in the city of Magnolia, Arkansas, between the first of April and the sixth of August, 1924; that the plaintiff purchased Roden's interest in the business, including all the outstanding accounts; that, while the plaintiff and Roden were in business as partners, Roden sold to N. B. Miller goods, wares and merchandise belonging to the partnership of the

17 So.3d 778 (2009) Brian MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D08-1294. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. August 7, 2009. Rehearing Denied September 24, 2009. William R. Ponall, and Michael J. Snure, of Kirkconnell, Lindsey, Snure and Yates, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellant.

500 U.S. 391 (1991) YATES v. EVATT, COMMISSIONER, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. No. 89-7691. Supreme Court of the United States. Argued January 8, 1991. Decided May 28, 1991. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA *393 David I. Bruck, by appointment of the Court, 498 U. S. 936

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 22-2994 & 23-1461 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER ALLEN YATES and SHAWN THOMAS CONNELLY, Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from the

Matter of Yates v Buckner-Engram (2025 NY Slip Op 00231) Matter of Yates v Buckner-Engram 2025 NY Slip Op 00231 Decided on January 15, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J