Cases

Alok Ahuja, Chief Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part I concur in affirmance of the Labor and Industrial-Commission’s award of compensation to Milton Young for his knee injury. I respectfully dissent, however, from the majority’s affirmance of the separate award for an injury to Young’s right shoulder. The Commission found that Young sustained

362 F.3d 1172 Dwight D. MATHEWS; Charles N. Hord; Bill Buchanan; Everett M. Miller; Albert Munn; Tommie Lee Rush, Plaintiffs-Appellees, andIssiah Milton; Leroy P. Bateman; Otis C. Joiner; Ernest L. Oliver; Fred Smith; Carolyn Whatley; Raul Tovar; Ronald Morton; Thomas Moungovan; Jesse Ronald Carlock; Joseph S. Piazza; Daniel J. Dreesman; Milan Jerome Rapo, Sr., Plaintiffs,v.CHEVRON CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.Dwight D. Mathews;

TURGEON, J, On May 6, 1993, plaintiff Nancy Bateman, who was employed as an operating nurse at Hershey Medical Center, was diagnosed as having occupationally-induced, contact urticaria with extracutaneous manifestations and allergic respiratory disease from her exposure to surgical latex gloves. As a result, she was forced to give up her career and is *3now sensitiz

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER and DYE, JJ. Taking no part: FULD, J. *Page 851

This Court issued the writ of certiorari to review the Court of Civil Appeals' reversal of an order dismissing a complaint for a declaratory judgment. The question presented is whether a circuit court has subject matter jurisdiction to review cases where the Alabama Board of Adjustment ("Board") has made a determination regarding the State's liability pursuant to Ala. Code 1975, § 41-9-60 et seq. Vonnie Bateman was fatally injured whe

*71OPINION. Leech : Petitioner and respondent are at issue here solely in regard to the 5 percent of the trust income which, by the indenture, was to be added to corpus, there being no question, of course, that the balance of the income is taxable to petitioner. Concisely stated, respondent’s position is that petitioner’s reservation of the power to app

181 F.Supp.2d 673 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. MATAGORDA COUNTY, TEXAS and James Mitchell, in his official capacity as Matagorda County Sheriff, Defendants. Christopher Jordan, Intervenor. No. Civ.A.G-01-010. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. January 10, 2002. *674

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13368 HAMID REZA ARDANEH vs. COMMONWEALTH. August 8,

WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge. At issue here is an alleged violation of section 404(a)(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1104(a)(1), and the equitable relief awarded pursuant to ERISA section 502(a)(3), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3). Chevron Corporation (Chevron) appeals from the injunction requiring it to modify its retirement plan records to reflect that six plaintiffs were involuntarily ter

02/06/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 22, 2025 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BRANDON RASHANN MURRAY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. CC20-CR-201 Robert T. Bateman, Judge ___________________________________

04/08/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 22, 2025 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DANIEL JOE OTTEN II Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. 63CC1-2020-CR-996 Robert Bateman, Judge ___________________________________

37 F.Supp.2d 248 (1999) MAX MARX COLOR & CHEMICAL CO. EMPLOYEES' PROFIT SHARING PLAN, and Walter Sichel, Petitioners, v. Milton R. BARNES, Kemper Securities Group, Inc., Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, John G. Kinnard & Company, and Texas Capital Securities, Respondents. No. 98 Civ. 7652(LAK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 21, 1999.

786 F.Supp. 977 (1992) PLANTERS AND CITIZENS BANK and Resolution Trust Corporation as Receiver for Great Southern Federal Savings & Loan Association, Plaintiffs, v. The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, and Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance Company, Clark Wiggins, Jr., David L. Beecher, Darrell Crosby and Cameron Crummey, Defendants, and PENNSYLVANIA MILLERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, v. E. Mills

THOMPSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Angelo Mageras swore to a criminal warrant charging Louis Chipouras with the offense of grand larceny. The police arrested Chipouras, but at the preliminary hearing, the court dismissed the felony warrant. Chipouras then sued Mageras and AJ&L Corporation (AJ&L) for malicious prosecution. After a two-day trial, the lower court struck Chipouras’ evidence

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT S. THOMAS ANDERSON, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.; GMAC Mortgage, LLC; and Residential Funding, LLC f/k/a Residential Funding Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. # 51) filed on February 17, 2014. P

OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-KA-01257-COA JOSHUA DEMIEN MAGEE A/K/A JOSHUA APPELLANT MAGEE v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/25/2016 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JOHN HUEY EMFINGER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: RANKIN COUNTY CIRCUIT

MEMORANDUM SURRICK, DISTRICT JUDGE Presently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment involving an insurance coverage dispute. Plaintiff Zurich American Insurance Company (“Zurich”) provides general insurance coverage for Rittenhouse Claridge, LP (“Rit-tenhouse”). Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Indian Harbor Insurance Company (“Indian Harbor”) has a duty to defend and a duty to indemnify Rit

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-12152 N.M., a juvenile vs. COMMONWEALTH. Suffolk. March 7,

786 F.Supp. 991 (1992) PLANTERS AND CITIZENS BANK and Resolution Trust Corporation as Receiver for Great Southern Federal Savings & Loan Association, Plaintiffs, v. PENNSYLVANIA MILLERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Clark Wiggins, Jr., David L. Beecher, Darrell Crosby and Cameron Crummey, Defendants, and PENNSYLVANIA MILLERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, v. E. Mills TARVER and Hugh Oliver, Third Pa