Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2154 ___________________________ Minnesota Bankers Association; Lake Central Bank lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; Martin J. Gruenberg, in his offi

Appellate Case: 24-1293 Document: 126 Date Filed: 11/10/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 10, 2025

951 F.2d 1259 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. F

ORDER TIMOTHY C. BATTEN, SR., District Judge. This case is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion [60] and DENIES Plaintiffs motion [51]. I. Background A. Factual Summary Jeffrey Grant wanted to purchase and develop 2.6 million dollars’ worth of re

*63Based on USPS's stated purpose in establishing the pilot program, its reliance on nonpublic-forum case law in the final rule, its use of the customized postage program as a commercial enterprise, and its strengthening of the restrictions over time, the Court concludes that, regardless of how one might characterize the prior Guidelines, the customized postage program un

488 N.W.2d 260 (1992) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as Receiver of Citizens State Bank of Fulda, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Duane K. SATHER, Respondent. No. C9-90-2010. Supreme Court of Minnesota. August 14, 1992. *261 Brian E. Palmer and Thomas O. Kelly, III, Dorsey & Whitney, Minneapolis, for appellant. Charl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANATOL ZUKERMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 15-cv-2131 (CRC) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The United States Postal Service (“USPS”) allows customers to design and print customized postage stamps. W

HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Jean Rosenfield appeals from the district court’s order granting a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant-Appellee HSBC Bank, USA (“HSBC”). Ms. Rosenfield brought claims seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, and damages against HSBC for alleged violations of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1667f, averring that

2023 UT App 136 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE, Appellant and Cross-appellee, v. JARED H. WESTON, FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, PREMATIC SERVICE CORPORATION, AND WILSON GREEN INSURANCE AGENCY, Appellees and Cross-appellants. Opinion No. 20180699-CA Filed November 9, 2023 Third Di

135 S.W.3d 605 (2004) INTERSTATE CONTRACTING CORPORATION, Appellee, v. CITY OF DALLAS, Texas, Appellant. No. 03-0152. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued April 23, 2003. Decided April 16, 2004. Rehearing Denied June 25, 2004. *606 Christina Stone, Gaughan & Stone, Houston, for Amicus Curiae ABC of

*497POST-TRIAL MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Dale L. Somers, United States Bankruptcy Judge This adversary proceeding began with claims asserted against certain parties other than SpiritBank, but SpiritBank was later added as a defendant and the claims against the other defendants have been resolved. In the remaining counts, Christopher J. Redmond, the

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge. James Marzano and John Majorek (“Plaintiffs”) bring this collective and class action against Proficio Mortgage Ventures, LLC, Proficio Bank, and First Liberty Financial Group, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.; the Illinois Minimum Wage Law (

OPINION TASHIMA, Circuit Judge: Darcy Ting, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and Consumer Action, a non-profit membership organization, both as private attorneys general, brought suit against AT&T, alleging that AT&T’s Consumer Services Agreement (“CSA”) violates California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act and that state’s Unfair Practices Act by barring customers from,

849 F.Supp. 1015 (1994) Virginia AMENT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PNC NATIONAL BANK, a national bank, Defendant. Suzanne CAPLAN, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MELLON BANK (DE), N.A., Defendant. Sara J. SZYDLIK and Donald R. Szydlik, for themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. FIRST OMNI BANK, N.A., Defendant. Barbara S. THOMPSON, et al., Plai

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: The Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) sued several officers and directors (collectively, “the defendants”) of a failed savings and loan institution alleging 1) negligence, 2) breach of fiduciary duty and 3) gross negligence. Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), the district court dismissed the negligence and breach of fiduciary duty claims holding that they fa

749 F.Supp.2d 1022 (2010) Tony Phat NGOC NGUYEN, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al., Defendants. No. C-10-4081-EDL. United States District Court, N.D. California. October 27, 2010. *1023 Jamilla Ann Moore, Law Office of Jamilla Moore, Elk Grove, CA, for Plaintiff. Mark Tyler Flewelling, Esq., Yaw-Jiun Wu, Anglin F

OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge. This contract case is before the court after trial in Pasadena, California. Previously, this court ruled that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) breached a contract with plaintiff when it voided the sale of property it had seized from another individual for the payment of taxes. See Koby v. United States, 47 Fed.Cl. 99 (2000). At issue here is defendant’s affirmative defen

OPINION ALLEGRA, Judge. “The United States are as much bound by their contracts as are individuals.”1 “You can check [in] any time you like, but you can never leave.”2 Following a remand from the Supreme Court, this contract case is before the court after a trial held in Des

336 F.Supp.2d 263 (2004) Terrence L. BODEWES, James A. Maloney, Ernest Bouchard, Vincent Fetes, Daryl Bodewes, James Biddle, Sr., George Ferraro and Thomas Herr, Plaintiffs, v. ULICO CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. No. 01-CV-365C. United States District Court, W.D. New York. September 25, 2004. *264 *26

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RESOLVING MOTIONS TO DISMISS COMPLAINT AND CROSS-COMPLAINTS HON. JAMES L. GARRITY, JR., U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE INTRODUCTION Philip Michael Scott, the plaintiff and chapter 13 debtor herein (the “Debtor”), is party to a Mortgage (defined below) on certain real property located in Scarsdale, New York. In 2014, Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC (“Ocwen”), as servicer f