Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA JORGE LUIS ESTRADA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ROYALTY CARPET MILLS, INC., Defendant and Appellant. S274340 Fourth Appellate District, Division Three G058397, G058969 Orange County Superior Court 30-2013-00692890 Ja

Filed 3/23/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JORGE LUIS ESTRADA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, G058397, G058969 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2013-00692890) ROYALTY CARPET MILLS, INC.,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 18-2235 RICHARD J. LYMAN, WILLIAM F. WELD, and ROBERT D. CAPODILUPO, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. CHARLES D. BAKER, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; and WILLIAM FRANCIS GALVIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Commonwe

No. 118,695 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS MARK ANTHONY BAKER, Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The State waives the ability to raise a statute of limitat

109 Ga. App. 724 (1964) 137 S.E.2d 322 SMITH v. NOXON RUG MILLS, INC. et al. 40625. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided May 6, 1964. Rehearing Denied May 18, 1964. *730 Greene, Neely, Buckley & DeRieux, McCamy, Minor, Vining & Phillips, John Minor, III, for plaintiff in err

*809ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART AND DENYING IT IN PART PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint came on for hearing before this court on May 1, 2013. Plaintiffs appeared by their counsel Stephen Gardner, and defendant appeared by its counsel Charles C. Sipos and David T. Biderman. Havi

ACCEPTED 13-15-00174-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/22/2015 8:09:32 PM

Nichols, Presiding Judge. The judgment of this court (Smith v. Noxon Rug Mills, Inc., 109 Ga. App. 724, 137 SE2d 322), having been reversed by the Supreme Court (Noxon Rug Mills, Inc. v. Smith, 220 Ga. 291, 138 SE2d 569), the judgment of this court affirming in part. and reversing in part the judgment of the trial court is vacated and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with the judgment o

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Giant Eagle, Inc., : : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1684 C.D. 2024 : Argued: October 8, 2025 Tierra Baker (Workers’ : Compensation Appeal Board), : : Respondent : BEFORE: HONORABLE PATRICIA A. McCUL

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 16a0111p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ STEPHEN TED KOPROWSKI, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │

717 S.E.2d 9 (2011) Irving EHRENHAUS, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-appellee, v. John D. BAKER, II, Peter C. Browning, John T. Casteen, III, Jerry Gitt, William H. Goodwin, Jr., Maryellen C. Herringer, Robert A. Ingram, Donald M. James, Mackey J. McDonald, Joseph Neubauer, Timothy D. Proctor, Ernest S. Rady, Van I. Richey, Ruth G. Shaw, Lanty L. Smith, Dona Davis Young, Wachovia Corporation and Wells Fargo &

ELMORE, Judge. On 26 March 2006, Andrea Moore and her minor son, D’Andre Moore (together, plaintiffs) filed an action against Quentin James Mills (defendant). The complaint alleged negligence and gross negligence arising from a 22 September 2005 motor vehicle accident. Defendant filed his answer on 4 May 2006, asserting contributory negligence and gross contributory negligence as affirmative defenses. Plaintiffs replied on 1

399 F.Supp. 628 (1975) Wenurth Wesley BAKER, Jr., a minor 15 years of age, by and thru his mother and next friend, Florence Radford, Plaintiff, v. HUNN ROOFING, INC., a Domestic Corporation, Defendant. No. 75-0171-D Civil. United States District Court, W. D. Oklahoma. Civil Division. June 24, 1975. *629 V. Lyle McPheeters, Oklaho

145 F.Supp.2d 878 (2001) Nancy LOZADA, Bob Warren, A.D. Christian and Jeanne Uwamaliya, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DALE BAKER OLDSMOBILE, INC., a Delaware corporation, d/b/a Dale Baker Kia, d/b/a Dale Baker Suzuki, d/b/a Fresh Start Auto Center, and d/b/a National Fleet Liquidators of Michigan; and CFC-Consumer Finance Corporation, f/k/a Consumer Finance Corporation, a Virginia corporation, Defendant

259 Ga. 80 (1989) 377 S.E.2d 153 COLUMBUS MILLS, INC. et al. v. KAHN et al. 46146. Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided March 15, 1989. King & Spalding, Frank C. Jones, Nolan C. Leake, David F. Guldenschuh, for appellants. Burnside, Wall & Daniel, Thomas R. Burnside, Jr., for appellees. Powell, Goldstein, F

374 B.R. 489 (2007) In re Aston BAKER, Debtor. No. 1-01-24227-dem. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York. August 2, 2007. *490 Heidi J. Sorvino, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Heike Vogel, Arent Fox PLLC, New York, NY, for Sheldon Good & Company Auctions, NorthEast LLC. Roy J. Lester, Lester & Weitz, P.C., Garden City

PER CURIAM. In these consolidated appeals,1 airline passengers or their survivors appeal from summary judgment in favor of Continental Airlines and a number of other air carriers on their claim for damages for failure to warn of the risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) on international flights. They argue that the airlines’ refusal of requests to warn was an unexpected event and thus, an “accident”

(2008) Darryl MILLS, Plaintiff v. CITY OF HARRISBURG, Stephen Blasko, Annemarie Bair Level Jenkins, Police Officer Jackson, and Investigator Evans, Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-0882. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. December 2, 2008. MEMORANDUM CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, District Judge. This is a civil rights action

614 F.3d 495 (2010) Bruce Roger MILLS, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF GRAND FORKS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-2119. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: March 9, 2010. Filed: July 27, 2010. *496 Jonathan T. Garas, I, argued, Fargo, ND,

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed