Cases

556 S.E.2d 242 (2001) 252 Ga. App. 343 LONG LEAF INDUSTRIES, INC., v. MITCHELL et al. No. A01A1411. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 7, 2001. Lokey & Smith, Malcolm, Smith, Atlanta, for appellant. Gammon & Anderson, W. Wright Gammon, Jr., Brad J. McFall, Cedartown for appellees. RUFFIN, Judge. William Mitchel

STATEMENT ROBERT M. DOW, JR., District Judge. I. Background In May 2011, KZF Development (KZF) and/or Dundee Partners (Dundee) removed approximately 180 trees from a 6.8 acre residential parcel in Northbrook, Illinois (the Site). Plaintiffs Robert and Sheryl Long allege that the tree removal causes flooding, which has, among other things, damaged their home. On June 15, 2012, Plaintiffs fi

Spina, J. This appeal concerns a wiretap on a telephone in a visitation booth at the Norfolk County house of correction (jail) pursuant to a warrant issued under G. L. c. 272, § 99 E and I. Late in the evening on January 9, 2006, two perpetrators shot Jamal Vaughn to death and absconded. The police investigation immediately focused on the defendant, Deryck Long. On January 10, 2006, Long was arrested in connection with se

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER COGAN, District Judge. The issue posed in this case is whether the customer accounts of an insolvent ser*558vice company, where each customer had the right to terminate service at any time, can nevertheless have value, such that if the principal of the business moves those customers to a third party in excha

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CRYSTAL E. LONG, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0834-SEM ) ED PETTYJOHN, MICHAEL F. ) MCGROERTY, WHITNEY POGWIST, ) MCCRONE SURVEYERS, et al., RONALD ) HASTINGS, CHELSEA HASTINGS, ) FORSIGHT, LLC, CYNTHIA HASTINGS, ) DAVID MARK ALLEN, TINA

*726OPINION OF THE COURT Edward M. Horey, J. The motion at bar is brought by the defendants. It seeks a dismissal of the plaintiffs summons on the grounds that the action for negligence commenced thereby is time barred under the applicable Statute of Limitations. It is agreed that the summons was served three years and one day after

828 N.E.2d 323 (2005) 357 Ill. App.3d 435 293 Ill.Dec. 353 Ronald SCHILLER and Merle Schiller, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bernard MITCHELL and Robert Stanley, Defendants-Appellees. No. 2-04-0170. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. April 27, 2005. *325 Glenn Seiden, Sara M.

523 F.Supp.2d 1132 (2007) Michael MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; CB Richard Ellis Long Term Disability Plan; UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, Defendants. No. CV 05-00810 DDP (RNBx). United States District Court, C.D. California. December 3, 2007. *1133 *1134

783 N.E.2d 1076 (2003) 336 Ill. App.3d 595 270 Ill.Dec. 776 Michelle LONG, Special Administratrix of the Estate of Kylee Bivens, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. A.O. MATHEW, M.D.; A.O. Mathew, M.D., P.C.; and Blessing Hospital, Defendants (Robert L. Hall, M.D.; Richard Saalborn, M.D.; and Gregory A. Francken, M.D., Respondents in Discovery-Appellees). No. 4-02-0391.

JUSTICE WECHT, concurring I concur in the result reached by the learned Majority. I write separately to highlight four areas of concern. I. As the Majority notes, evidence of consent is not relevant to the issue of negligence, inasmuch as a patient's consent does not make a physician's negligence more or less probable. Maj. Op. at 317-18. On the other hand, evidence of risks and complications "

BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Currently pending before the Court are three Motions: (1) Getty Oil Company ("Getty"), Union Oil Company of California ("Union"), ENI Oil & Gas Inc. ("ENI"), and Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.'s ("Plains") Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) ; (2) an a

[J-77-2018] [MO: Todd, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT LANETTE MITCHELL, : No. 55 WAP 2017 : Appellee : Appeal from the Order of the Superior : Court entered May 5, 2017 at No. 384

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2017 ME 70 Docket: Cum-16-375 Argued: March 2, 2017 Decided: April 18, 2017 Panel: MEAD, GORMAN, JABAR, HJELM, and HUMPHREY, JJ.* JOYCE E. MITCHELL v.

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Mitchell Bounds appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment dismissing his claim for additional long-term disability benefits against Bell Atlantic Enterprises Flexible Long-Term Disability Plan (the “Plan”). The claim is governed by ERISA. See 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1

CONCLUSION After an independent review of the record, including the attorney's fee motions filed in this case, the time entries and declarations submitted by both parties, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the parties' objections to the Magistrate Judge's ruling, and based on the Court's ultimate authority and discretion to award attorney's fees, defendant must pay attorney's fees in the amount of $17,00

89 F.Supp.2d 353 (2000) Dr. Fernando COMMODARI, Plaintiff, v. LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY and Long Island University Faculty Federation, Local 3998, NYSUT, AFT, AFL-CIO, Defendants. Civil Action No. CV-99-2581 (DGT). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 31, 2000. *354 *355

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice. [¶ 1.] A.L. (Mother) appeals an order terminating her parental rights to her children. We affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY [¶ 2.] Mother has two minor children, R.L. (Daughter) born on July 6, 1999 and E.L. (Son) born on June 8, 2003. On February 24, 2004, Mother took Daughter age 4 and Son age 8 months to their daycare provider around 6 a.m. Later on that

Liacos, C.J. On May 26, 1993, a jury convicted the defendant of murder in the first degree, two counts of armed robbery, and armed assault in a dwelling. On appeal, the defendant contends that the trial judge committed reversible error in (1) failing to excuse one allegedly biased juror for cause, (2) failing to require the Commonwealth to explain its peremptory challenges of two Hispanic members of the venire, and (3) denying t

MAASSEN, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION A husband was granted a 20-day domestic violence protective order against his wife. During a brief extension of the 20-day order, the wife sent the husband a text message about their dog. This text message, a violation of the 20-day order, formed the basis of a long-term domestic violence protective order entered a few weeks later. The long-term order was affirmed o

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Mitchell Mackey appeals a district court 1 judgment affirming the Secretary’s denial of his application for Social Security disability benefits. After again probing the perplexing issue of how medical evidence first submitted to the Secretary’s Appeals Council should be evaluated by a reviewing c