Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mitchell v. Cain”
Mitchell v. Cainpublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mitchell v. Cainpublic domain
971 F.Supp. 1064 (1997) Willie Fay MITCHELL v. Burl CAIN, Warden and Michael O. COOK v. Burl CAIN, Warden. Civil Action Nos. 3:97-883, 3:97-994. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Monroe Division. July 28, 1997. Willie Fay Mitchell, Angola, LA, pro se. Michael O. Cook, Angola, LA, pro se.
Sharon Cain and Ronald Cain v. Timothy S. Ellispublic domain
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District SHARON CAIN AND RONALD CAIN, ) ) Respondents, ) ) WD86884 v. ) OPINION FILED: ) NOV
State v. Cainpublic domain
ORDER PER CURIAM: Mr. Michael E. Cain appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of one count of rape with a weapon and two counts of forcible sodomy. Mr. Cain challenges the prior offender finding by the trial court. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 80.25(b).
Cain v. Backpublic domain
889 N.E.2d 1253 (2008) Jeffrey L. CAIN, M.D., Appellant-Defendant, v. Richard BACK and Suzette Back, Appellees-Plaintiffs. No. 20A03-0705-CV-225. Court of Appeals of Indiana. July 21, 2008. Michael E. O'Neill, Richard P. Girzadas, Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, Schererville, IN, Attorneys for Appellant. Mary A. Findling, Findling Garau Germano & Pennington
Telford Lands LLC v. Cainpublic domain
EISMANN, Justice. This is an appeal out of Butte County from a judgment condemning an easement across the appellants’ real property for an irrigation pipeline installed by the respondents so that they can save water by avoiding the conveyance losses that occurred while using the Moore Canal to transport their water. We affirm the
Hawthorne v. Cainpublic domain
*1030ante, p. 825; ante, p. 825; ante, p. 827; ante, p. 829; *1031No. 03-10301. No. 03-10360. No. 03-10806.
E.C. Mitchell v. Larry Mitchellpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 3, 2002 E. C. MITCHELL v. LARRY W. MITCHELL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 00D84 Carol Soloman, Judge No. M2001-01609-COA-R3-CV - Filed May 12, 2003 This case comes before the Court upon consideration of the record and Appel
Cain v. Super. Ct.public domain
Filed 4/11/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR FRED MARION CAIN III, Petitioner, A170052 v. SUPERIOR COURT OF (Solano County Super. Ct. CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF No. F23-01357) SOLANO, Respondent; THE PEOPLE
Mitchell v. Esparzapublic domain
*1142ante, p. 12; *1143No. 02-10556. No. 02-10694. No. 02-10829. No. 02-11000. No. 02-11013. No. 02-11068.
Mitchell v. Esparzapublic domain
*1142ante, p. 12; *1143No. 02-10556. No. 02-10694. No. 02-10829. No. 02-11000. No. 02-11013. No. 02-11068.
Jaynes v. Cainpublic domain
659 Argued and submitted June 1, 2021; reversed and remanded as to claim regarding trial counsel’s failure to impeach Smith, otherwise affirmed May 18, 2022 JASON JAY JAYNES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Brad CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution,
Cain v. Waste Management, Incpublic domain
Taylor, J. The issue in this case concerns the proper standard for determining whether an injured employee is entitled to collect worker’s compensation benefits for total and permanent disability pursuant to MCL 418.361(3)(g). 1 Specifically, the question is
State ex rel. Deboue v. Cainpublic domain
In re Thomas M. Deboue, Applying for Reconsideration to this courts action dated 01/4/02, from the Parish of Orleans No. 301-828. Denied.
People v. Cainpublic domain
2021 IL App (1st) 191921 No. 1-19-1921 September 27, 2021 Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing December 13, 2021 First Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE
State ex rel. Deboue v. Cainpublic domain
In re Deboue, Thomas Mitchell; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. B, No. 301-828; Denied.
Mitchell v. Campbellpublic domain
88 S.W.3d 561 (2002) Raymond MITCHELL v. Donal CAMPBELL. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. April 19, 2002. Permission to Appeal Denied October 7, 2002. *563 Raymond Mitchell, Nashville, Tennessee, Pro Se. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Michael E. Moore, Solicitor General; and Dawn Jordan, Assist
Cain v. Lymberpublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 11/09/2020 02:10 AM CST - 820 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 306 Nebraska Reports CAIN v. LYMBER Cite as 306 Neb. 820 Donald V. Cain, Jr.
Klock v. Cainpublic domain
813 F.Supp. 1430 (1993) Donald KLOCK, Plaintiff, v. Mitchell CAIN, et al., Defendants. No. CV 91-0163 AWT. United States District Court, C.D. California. February 17, 1993. Stephen Yagman, Yagman & Yagman, Venice, CA, for plaintiff. Peter J. Ferguson, Ferguson, Praet & Sherman, Santa Ana, CA, George W. Schaeffer, Jr., Silver, Schaeffer & Hadden, I
State Ex Rel. Cain v. Mitchellpublic domain
543 S.W.2d 785 (1976) STATE of Missouri ex rel. Donald L. CAIN et al., Relators, v. James MITCHELL et al., Respondents. No. 59532. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. December 13, 1976. Donald L. Cain, Kierst, Cain & Gordon, Kansas City, for relators. Willard B. Bunch, John E. Cash, Kansas City, for respondents. SEILER, Chief Justice. Relato