Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Mitchell v. USA”
Mitchell v. Uniforms USA, Inc.public domain
Stein, J. Plaintiff was injured at her workplace when she slipped and fell on an area of wet tile in the building’s lobby left uncovered by protective matting. She thereafter commenced this action against the subcontractors who maintained floor mats in, or cleaned, the building. After joinder of issue and discovery, defendants separately moved for summary judgment, arguing that they owed no duty to plaintiff and, in any even
Mitchell v. USApublic domain
Mitchell v . USA CV-97-452-JD 10/20/97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE James R. Mitchell v. Civil N o . 97-452-JD United States of America, et a l . REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Pro se plaintiff James R. Mitchell has brought suit against the U.S. Department of Labor ("USDL") to enforce a March 8 , 1997, settlement agreement reached between h
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 16, 2016 NO. 03-16-00201-CV Melissa Fontenette-Mitchell, Appellant v. Cinemark USA, Inc. d/b/a Discount Cinema 8, Appellee APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND BOURL
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-16-00201-CV Melissa Fontenette-Mitchell, Appellant v. Cinemark USA, Inc. d/b/a Discount Cinema 8, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, NO. 14-0971-CC4, HONORABLE JOHN MCMASTER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Mitchell v. Dillahuntpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota denied.
Mitchell v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Mitchell v. Diazpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
State v. Mitchellpublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Mitchell v. Californiapublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
Mitchell v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Mitchell v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Mitchell v. Wisconsinpublic domain
I A In Birchfield v. North Dakota , 579 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 2160, 195 L.Ed.2d 560 (2016), we recounted the country's efforts over the years to address the terrible problem of drunk
Colbert v. Mitchellpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District denied.
Mitchell v. Torrence Cablevision USA, Inc.public domain
The plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant Torrence Cablevision USA, Inc. ("Torrence"). On March 24, 1999, Nina S. Mitchell sued Torrence for damages based on injuries she sustained when she tripped and fell over a coaxial television cable in her yard. In her complaint, Mitchell alleged Torrence had been guilty of negligence and wantonness in causing her injuries. On February 3, 2000, the trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of Torrence o
Mitchell v. Torrence Cablevision USA, Inc.public domain
I respectfully dissent from the order denying the petition for certiorari review of the Court of Civil Appeals' decision. The plaintiff, Nina S. Mitchell, tripped over a coaxial television cable lying in her yard. Mitchell had telephoned Torrence Cablevision USA, Inc. ("Torrence"), for service six times during the four years preceding her accident. The service ticket for each call indicated that the "customer problem" was "bury cable"; however, Torrence failed to bury the cable. <
Mitchell v. Millerpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Mitchell v. Californiapublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District denied.
Mitchell v. Cuomopublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Mitchell v. Precythepublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Mitchell v. Taylorpublic domain
*462Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.