Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WALLACE MITCHELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-1699 (RMC) ) UNITED STATES OF

MEMORANDUM Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge Defendant Helene Mitchell (“Mitchell”) pled guilty in December of 2006 to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(e). Because Mitchell had three or more qualifying prior convictions under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA” or “the Act”), she received a mandatory minimum sentence of fifteen years’ imprisonment.

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. On November 21, 2017, Appellant Kehinda Mitchell pled guilty to three counts: (1) Conspiracy to Commit Offenses Against the United States, (2) Interstate Transportation of a Stolen Vehicle, and (3) Fraudulent Use of Access Devices. The district court 1 sentenced Mitchell to 41 months'

THAPAR, Circuit Judge. The district court granted Stephen Mitchell habeas relief and gave him a sentence of time-served with three years of supervised release. Both Mitchell and the United States appealed. Since their respective appeals were filed, this circuit has decided substantially-similar cases. Bound by these recent precedents, we affirm the district court in part and reverse in

'Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: Sherman Mitchell (Mitchell) was convicted by jury of multiple counts of drug crimes resulting from his role in a .phency-clidine (PCP) distribution ring. Mitchell challenges his convictions on several grounds, including, inter alia, the. gove

MEMORANDUM OPINION EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge. Pending before the Court is defendant Vernard Mitchell’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Because it appeared to the Court that Mr. Mitchell raised arguments for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), the Court ordered the Go

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Clarence Mitchell (“movant”) is a federal inmate currently confined at the Federal Medical Center Devens, in Ayer, Massachusetts. Movant timely filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (D.I. 71; D.I. 77) Respondent filed an answer in opposition (D.I. 83), to which movant fi

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LEZMOND C. MITCHELL, No. 11-99003 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:09-cv-08089-MHM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Ari

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Christopher Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United S

PER CURIAM. Mitchell Atterberry pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute, and to possess with the intent to distribute, methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B), and 851 (Count 1), and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 851 (Count 2).

Case: 14-15621 Date Filed: 01/18/2017 Page: 1 of 47 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 14-15621 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80205-KAM-

PER CURIAM. Rory Alan Mitchell appeals his 151-month sentence for two counts of bank robbery, asserting both procedural error and substantive unreasonableness. Because we conclude that the district court’s 1 procedural error in calculating the applicable Guidelines range was harmless, and the sentence imposed was not un

RENDELL, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges McKEE, Chief Judge, BARRY, GREENAWAY, JR., and VANASKIE join, and AMBRO joins as to Part II only, dissenting. I respectfully dissent because I find both of the majority’s conclusions here— that we have jurisdiction over this appeal and that the Government’s program of collecting, analyzing, and maintaining the DNA of arrestees and pretrial detainees comports with

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge Plaintiff Derrick Carrington brings this hybrid breach of contract and duty of fair representation action against his former employer, the United States Postal Service (“USPS”), and his former union, the National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO (“Union”), pursuant t

OPINION SILER, Circuit Judge. Defendant Darnell Mitchell appeals the district court’s determination that his prior Tennessee state robbery convictions are violent felonies under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). For the following reasons, we AFFIRM. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

791 F.Supp.2d 1056 (2011) United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Nelson MITCHELL, Defendant. No. CR 10-2054 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. May 17, 2011. *1057 Kenneth J. Gonzales, United States Attorney, Shana Pennington, Assistant United States Attorney, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff. Alonzo J. Padilla

635 F.3d 990 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rollie MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-1831. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued November 4, 2010. Decided March 24, 2011. *991 Matthew P. Brookman (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Evansville, I

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jason Mitchell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint, which was properly construed as one filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 4

MEMORANDUM ** John Mitchell (“Mitchell”) appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to reopen his case or vacate and reenter judgment to allow a timely appeal to this court. *512The district court entered judgment against Mitchell after he failed to oppose the government’s motion to dismiss, or alternatively, its motion for summary judgment.

633 F.3d 997 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dino Nick MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-4141. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. February 3, 2011. *998 Bretta Pirie (Steven B. Killpack, Utah Federal Defender, with her on the briefs), Utah Federal Defender's Office, Salt Lake City, UT, for