⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Molina v. Michigan, State of”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019-01-23 · Published · cited 4× · 914 F.3d 430
JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Julio Molina Hernandez ("Molina") appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") decision (1) finding him removable on the basis that his felonious assault conviction under Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.82 is a crime
Michigan Supreme Court · 2021-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 30, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
Michigan Supreme Court · 2021-06-04 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 4, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice 161581
Michigan Supreme Court · 2021-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan September 3, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
People v. Molinapublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 2024-12-05 · Published · cited 16× · 2024 IL 129237
2024 IL 129237 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 129237) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. VINCENT MOLINA, Appellant. Opinion filed December 5, 2024. JUSTICE NE
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019-07-26 · Published · cited 0× · 392 F. Supp. 3d 809
JUDITH E. LEVY, United States District Judge Defendant Leopoldo Vargas-Molina was indicted for unlawful reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He filed two motions to dismiss the indictment, both of which go to the validity of his underlying removal order from 2011. Vargas-Molina relies upon § 1326(d) to collaterally att
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2017-08-04 · Published · cited 0× · 133 Fed. Cl. 14; 2017 U.S. Claims LEXIS 919; 2017 WL 3326842
OPINION AND ORDER WHEELER, Judge. Another insurance company has come to this Court seeking payment from the Government under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (“ACA”). Plaintiffs Molina Healthcare of California, Inc. and its other state affiliates (“Molina”) offer health insurance plans through the Health Benefit Exchanges (“Exchanges”) created u
Molina v. New Yorkpublic domain
District Court, N.D. New York · 2010-03-03 · Published · cited 1× · 697 F. Supp. 2d 276; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20361; 2010 WL 812353
697 F.Supp.2d 276 (2010) Francisco J. MOLINA, Plaintiff, v. State of NEW YORK; NYS Office of Children and Family Services; NYS Division for Youth; Louis Gossett Jr. Residential Center; John A Johnson, Commissioner of the NYS Division for Youth; Joseph Impicciatore, Director of the Louis Gossett Jr. Residential Center; Cyril Stephens, Youth Detention Aide at the Louis Gossett Jr. Residential Center; Arthur Myers, Youth Detention Aide at the Louis
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2008-03-27 · Published · cited 92× · 750 N.W.2d 603; 278 Mich. App. 327
Defendant appeals as of right from the trial court's order denying his amended petition for change of custody and other relief. Because both the referee and the trial court erred by making a custody determination without consideration of the statutory best-interest factors, we reverse. On appeal, defendant argues that the referee erred by not making findings of fact or considering the best-interest factors in determining custody of the parties' minor child and that the trial co
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018-06-19 · Published · cited 3× · 2018 Ohio 2370; 114 N.E.3d 757
TYACK, J. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, ABC Home Care and Nursing Services, Inc. ("ABC Home Care") appeals from the July 24, 2018 entry of the trial court finding that ABC Home Care's claims are subject to mandatory arbitration, and staying this lawsuit pending the arbitration. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.
District Court, E.D. New York · 1995-12-27 · Published · cited 20× · 956 F. Supp. 257; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21482; 1996 WL 785496
956 F.Supp. 257 (1995) Jose F. MOLINA, Plaintiff, v. The STATE OF NEW YORK, and George Pataki, Governor, Defendants. No. 95-CV-534 (JRB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 27, 1995. *258 Jose F. Molina, Malone, NY, Pro Se. MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER BARTELS, District Judge.
District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2014-02-04 · Published · cited 0× · 995 F. Supp. 2d 944; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13932; 2014 WL 457706
ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, District Judge. Before the Court is The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society d/b/a Good Samaritan Society Davenport’s (“Defendant”) Combined Motion to Dismiss or Stay the Proceedings and to Compel Arbitration (“Motion”), filed on November 22, 2013. Clerk’s No. 4. Connie A. Molina (“Molina”) and Victoria Terronez (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a brief in resistance to the M
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007-06-28 · Published · cited 10× · 566 F. Supp. 2d 770; 13 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 130; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47658; 2007 WL 4404330
(2007) Jose MOLINA, Stephen O. Spencer, and Robert M. Bliznick, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated plaintiffs known and unknown, Plaintiffs, v. FIRST LINE SOLUTIONS LLC, Defendant. No. 05 C 5818. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 28, 2007. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM T. HART, Di
People v. Molinapublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1994-06-09 · Published · cited 6× · 25 Cal. App. 4th 1038; 30 Cal. Rptr. 805; 30 Cal. Rptr. 2d 805; 94 Daily Journal DAR 7960; 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4309; 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 583
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1040 OPINION A police search of Arturo Cesar Molina's Ford pickup truck uncovered, among other things, usable amounts of cocaine and methamphetamine, a loaded firearm, and a length of copper cable covered in rubber. Molina, accordingly, was charged by information with: count 1: possession of coc
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000-03-30 · Published · cited 1× · 207 F.3d 1351
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAR 30 2000 THOMAS K. KAHN
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-03-13 · Published · cited 0× · 131 F.4th 798
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35440 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO, ORDER Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35450 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000-03-30 · Published · cited 76× · 207 F.3d 1351; 54 Fed. R. Serv. 117; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 5804
HILL, Senior Circuit Judge: Plaintiff sued defendants for damages incurred when his boat was damaged and defendants denied insurance coverage. Two defendants moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The district court construed the motion as one for summary judgment and granted it. After trial, plaintiff won a judgment against the remaining defendants and was awarde
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-09-15 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00082-CV No. 15-25-00082-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS In the Court of Appeals 9/15/2025 3:46 PM
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2002-02-14 · Published · cited 2× · 220 F. Supp. 2d 1249; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18236; 2002 WL 31155071
220 F.Supp.2d 1249 (2002) Eladio RUIZ DE MOLINA, Plaintiff, v. MERRITT & FURMAN INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., et al, Defendants. Merritt & Furman Insurance Agency, Inc., et al, Plaintiffs, v. Worldwide Marine Underwriters, Inc., et al., Defendants. Nos. Civ.A. 96-BE-3166-S, Civ.A. 00-BE-2172-S. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. Februar
People v. Molinapublic domain
Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1983-10-07 · Published · cited 11× · 121 Misc. 2d 483; 468 N.Y.S.2d 551; 1983 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3945
OPINION OF THE COURT Bertram Katz, J. It is a legal truism that harsh sanctions breed ingenuity. Thus, when the New York State Legislature stiffened the penalties against intoxicated drivers two years ago,1 one predictable result was that the number of challenges to the use of blood alcohol measuring devices would increase proportionately.2