Cases

2015 WI 103 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP2504-W through 2013AP2508-W, 2014AP296-OA & 2014AP417-W through 2014AP421-W COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of John Doe Proceeding State of Wisconsin ex rel. Three Unnamed Petitioners, Petitioner, v.

2015 WI 103 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP2504-W through 2013AP2508-W, 2014AP296-OA & 2014AP417-W through 2014AP421-W COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of John Doe Proceeding State of Wisconsin ex rel. Three Unnamed Petitioners, Petitioner, v.

OPINION TAYLOR, Bankruptcy Judge. INTRODUCTION Appellants, chapter 7 1 debtors William David Goldstein and Molly K. Goldstein, appeal the bankruptcy court’s order authorizing the chapter 7 trustee to compromise and sell, as property of the chapter 7 estate, four state court cla

FILED 1 ORDERED PUBLISHED MAR 03 2015 2 SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 4 OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT 5

Per Curiam: *479DriveTime Car Sales Company, LLC appeals from the ruling of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying its motion to compel David and Gifty Haight to arbitrate their claims against DriveTime for malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act. Because a published op

2015 WI 103 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP2504-W through 2013AP2508-W, 2014AP296-OA & 2014AP417-W through 2014AP421-W COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of John Doe Proceeding State of Wisconsin ex rel. Three Unnamed Petitioners, Petitioner, v.

2015 WI 103 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP2504-W through 2013AP2508-W, 2014AP296-OA & 2014AP417-W through 2014AP421-W COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of John Doe Proceeding State of Wisconsin ex rel. Three Unnamed Petitioners, Petitioner, v.

2015 WI 103 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP2504-W through 2013AP2508-W, 2014AP296-OA & 2014AP417-W through 2014AP421-W COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of John Doe Proceeding State of Wisconsin ex rel. Three Unnamed Petitioners, Petitioner, v.

2015 WI 103 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP2504-W through 2013AP2508-W, 2014AP296-OA & 2014AP417-W through 2014AP421-W COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of John Doe Proceeding State of Wisconsin ex rel. Three Unnamed Petitioners, Petitioner, v.

2015 WI 103 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP2504-W through 2013AP2508-W, 2014AP296-OA & 2014AP417-W through 2014AP421-W COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of John Doe Proceeding State of Wisconsin ex rel. Three Unnamed Petitioners, Petitioner, v.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Ralph B. Kirscher, Chief U.S. Bankruptcy Judge At Butte in said District this 16th day of December, 2015. In this adversary proceeding, the Plaintiff Molly Schwarz (“Molly” or “Plaintiff’) seeks, denial of the Debtor/Defendant Marc Andreas Liechti’s (“Liechti” or “Debtor”) discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(A) for knowingly and fraudulently making a false oath or

JANE TRICHE MILAZZO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment regarding liability (Doc. 32). For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART. BACKGROUND This negligence action arises out of an incident on March 19, 2017 in which Plaintiff Brian O'Malley was struck by a locomotive while working as a switchman employed

CROTHERS, Justice. [¶ 1] Michael Sorenson appeals the district court’s judgment quieting title to oil, gas and other minerals in George B. Fel-*801ton, Jr. We reverse and remand for entry of a judgment quieting title to the oil, gas and other minerals in Sorenson. I [¶ 2] On May 20, 2008, Sorenson filed a complaint to quiet title

WILBUR, Justice. [¶ 1.] A jury found Doap Deng Chuol guilty of three counts of distribution of a controlled drug or substance in violation of SDCL 22-42-2 and three counts of possession of a controlled drug or substance in violation of SDCL 22-42-5. Chuol appeals a number of issues, including the circuit court’s denial of his motion to suppress the in-court identification, the r

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J. ¶ 42. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I agree with the per curiam that the July 16, 2015 majority opinion authored by Justice Gableman is significantly flawed and must be modified.1 I do not, however, join the per curiam denying the Special Prosecutor's motion for reconsideration.2 f 43. In response to t

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-1676 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Darrius Decnan Redd

Filed 2/8/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2011 ND 33 Michael Sorenson, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Barbara J. Felton, Defendant and Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT WETHERBEE’S MOTION TO AMEND WILLIAM P. JOHNSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Wetherbee’s Motion to Join Additional Parties and Amend Pleadings by Filing of His First Counterclaims of Prima Facie.Tort, Conspiracy,. Civil RICO, and Conspiracy under Civil RICO [Doc. 181] (“Motion to Amend”), filed on Oct

74 [107 Op. Att’y BUILDING CODES MANUFACTURED HOMES – FIRE SPRINKLERS – WHETHER STATE LAW REQUIRES FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS TO BE INSTALLED IN MANUFACTURED HOMES – WHETHER FEDERAL LAW WOULD PREEMPT SUCH A REQUIREMENT March 2, 2022 The Honorable Joseph M. Mitrecic President, Board of County Commissioners of Worcester County You have asked whether Maryland law requires the installa

384 N.W.2d 468 (1986) In re the Marriage of Keith R. NELSON, petitioner, Appellant, v. Karen A. NELSON, Respondent. No. CO-85-1314. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. March 18, 1986. *469 John H. McLoone, IV, Molly Byron, Waseca, for appellant. James R. Keating, Keating & Peterson, Faribault, for respondent. Heard,