Cases

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0195p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MONICA GRAY, │ Plaintiff-Appellant, │

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0313p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MONICA GRAY, │ Plaintiff-Appellant, │

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Beales, O’Brien, AtLee, Malveaux, Athey, Causey, PUBLISHED Friedman, Chaney, Raphael, Lorish, Callins, White, Frucci and Bernhard Argued at Richmond, Virginia MONICA DRASOVEAN OPINION BY v. Record No. 0259-23-4

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI MAXWELL, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. In this custody case, the chancellor found the natural parents unfit to retain custody of their young daughter. After considering the child’s best interest and conducting an Albright1 analysis, the chancellor awarded joint custody to the child’s maternal gre

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-21-00177-CV C. BRYAN CANTRELL, AS SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, Appellant v. MONICA RAE LOIZOS, Appellee From the 278th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No. 2029813

FILED September 23, 2015 TICOURTOF WORKERS ' C O~IPI:X SATIO:>i

Opinion KENNARD, J. Statutory law allows a city to install at an intersection an automated traffic enforcement device that photographs a traffic law offender, *904 who is then issued a citation, as was defendant, who went through a red light in Culver City and was later convicte

William Terry Gray, the executor of the estate of John Merrill Gray II ("John"), appeals the probate court's judgment finding that John Merrill Gray III ("Jack") is entitled to receive a share of John's estate under Ala. Code 1975, §43-8-91. We reverse the probate court's judgment and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Background In 1981, John executed his will. At that time, John w

Opinion and Partial Dissent by Judge BERZON; Partial Majority Opinion, Partial Concurrence, and Partial Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD; Concurrence by Judge WARDLAW. BERZON, Circuit Judge, with whom Judge KLEINFELD concurs except as to Sections II.B.2.b.(l)(ii) and II.C, and Judge WARDLAW concurs except as to Section II.C. We consider the facial constitutionality of ordinances enacted by the

COLEMAN, Justice, for the Court: • ¶ 1. The Monroe County Circuit Court granted summary judgment in favor of Arch Specialty Insurance Company, finding that Arch’s general liability policy did not provide coverage for the claims asserted by the 'wrongful death beneficiaries of William Gray. The Grays’ claims of negligent hiring, negligent training, and failure

Memorandum Decision CHRISTIANSEN, Judge: ¶ 1 S.K.A. appeals the juvenile court’s dis-positional order, which included suspended jail time. We affirm. ¶ 2 In April 2015, when S.K.A. was seventeen years old, the State filed a delinquency petition in the juvenile court alleging that S.K.A. had committed assault, an offense that would be a class B misdemeanor if committed by an adult.

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Raphael, Lorish and Frucci PUBLISHED Argued at Arlington, Virginia AV AUTOMOTIVE, L.L.C., ET AL. v. Record No. 2168-23-4 DONALD B. BAVELY, ET AL. OPINION BY JUDGE STUART A. RAPHAEL

Memorandum Decision CHRISTIANSEN, Judge: ¶ 1 S.K.A. appeals the juvenile court’s dis-positional order, which included suspended jail time. We affirm. ¶ 2 In April 2015, when S.K.A. was seventeen years old, the State filed a delinquency petition in the juvenile court alleging that S.K.A. had committed assault, an offense that would be a class B misdemeanor if committed by an adult.

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA PUBLISHED Present: Judges Raphael, Lorish and Frucci Argued at Arlington, Virginia AV AUTOMOTIVE, L.L.C., ET AL. v. Record No. 2168-23-4 DONALD B. BAVELY, ET AL. OPINION BY JUDGE STUART A. RAPHAEL DONALD

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MONICA L. MADDEN, a/k/a SHANA VALESHIA GOODWIN, a/k/a MONICA WRIGHT Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 98-C-2030 Seth Norman, Judge No. M1999-00176-CCA-R3-CD - Decided May 5, 2000 Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, the defendant pled guilty in Davidso

Memorandum Opinion & Order GRAY H. MILLER, District Judge. Pending before the court are defendants, Denbury Onshore, L.L.C. and Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, L.L.C.’s motions for summary judgment pertaining to all of plaintiffs’ claims (Dkts. 27, 30, 31). After considering the motions, responses, record evidence, and applicable law, the court is of the opinion that defendants’ motions should be GRAN

OPINION Opinion by Justice Schenck Appellant Brinson Benefits, Inc. (“Brin-son”) appeals the trial court’s judgment awarding appellees Linda Hooper (“Ms. Hooper”), Sean Sendelbach (“Mr. Sendelbach”), and Holmes Murphy & Associates, Inc. (“HMA”) attorney’s fees pursuant to the Texas Theft Liability Act (“TTLA”) in its suit against

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS MARY GEIGER LEWIS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs filed this case alleging claims for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, declaratory judgment, and trademark cancellation under federal law and claims of trademark infringement, breach of contract, conversion, violation of the South Carolina

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered September 19, 2012, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendants’ answers to the extent of precluding defendant 1211 Wheeler LLC (Wheeler) from introducing evidence that it lacked notice of a hazardous lead paint condition, and denied Wheeler’s motion to compel plaintiffs to produce authorizations for the medical and educational

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), entered September 19, 2012, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendants’ answers to the extent of precluding defendant 1211 Wheeler LLC (Wheeler) from introducing evidence that it lacked notice of a hazardous lead paint condition, and denied Wheeler’s motion to compel plaintiffs to produce authorizations for the medical and educational