Cases

[Cite as State v. Howell, 2019-Ohio-3182.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 107545 v. : SLATTER HOWELL, III,

AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed June 18, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01635-CV MONIQUE WATTS AND SHEDRICK JONES, Appellants V. BEALIE HANCOCK, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge. This action was brought by the original plaintiff, Angela Brooks, against the defendant District of Columbia (“the District”) pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (“ID-EIA”), 20 U.S.C §§ 1400 et seq., on behalf of her then-minor child, Ronnie Thomas, seeking to compel the District of Columbia to issu

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the motion filed by the defendant Coastal International Security, Inc. (“Coastal”), to dismiss the Complaint of Plaintiffs Monique Lockhart and Monique Lockhart, as next best friend of K.C., pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), for “failure to prose

I respectfully dissent. The legal question to be addressed is whether Buck Creek State Park or the Ohio Department of Natural Resources ("ODNR") is to some degree liable for the injuries sustained by the Howell family, the Scofield family and others who stayed at the park overnight. ODNR asserts that no liability exists due to the operation of R.C. 1533.18 and 1533.181, commonly known as the Recreational User Statute. R.C. 153

MEMORANDUM OPINION Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This case comes before the Court on plaintiff Justina Shaw’s motion for attorneys’ fees for the work spent on the previous fee litigation, ie., fees on fees. For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant Ms. Shaw’s motion a

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge Pending before the Court is defendant Coastal International Security, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 25, on the sole remaining count in the complaint alleging, in Count II, wrongful discharge in violation of public policy. For the reasons set forth below, the defen

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge • ■ After prevailing in an administrative 'due process hearing on her claim under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act and Individuals, with Disabilities in Education Improvement Act (collectively, the “IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §. 1400 et seg., the plaintiff, Mabel Flood, who is suing on b

ISIAH COLE JR. AND HIS * NO. 2024-CA-0437 WIFE, KAREN COLE * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * NEW ORLEANS EMERGENCY FOURTH CIRCUIT MEDICAL SERVICES, CITY * OF NEW ORLEANS, DERECK STATE OF LOUISIANA BLANCHARD, NICHOLAS * * * * * * * MANNING APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORL

MEMORANDUM OPINION BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge. Before the Court is defendant District of Columbia’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s August 31, 2011 Order granting in part plaintiff Angela Brooks’ motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff initiated this lawsuit pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Ac

Opinion issued April 30, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00085-CV ——————————— ANNA WILLIAMS, Appellant V. HMAIDAN HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION T.S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge Plaintiff Jeffry Irving is a Virginia resident who sued his former employer, PAE Government Services, Inc. (“PAE”), a California corporation, and four of PAE’s employees, alleging three causes of action; (i) retaliation for engaging in statutorily protected activity as defined by § 3730(h)(1) of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), (ii) violation o

MEMORANDUM OPINION Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge Pending before the Court is plaintiff Jo-rie Wimbish’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to the attorneys’ fees provision of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. Ms. Wimbish seeks to recover attorneys’ fees and

liARMSTRONG, Judge, concurring. I concur simply to point out that the insurance policy exclusion at issue in the present case is different and broader than the exclusion of the Lloyd’s MEL policy at issue in Howell v. American Casualty Co., 96-0694 (La.App. 4th Cir. 3/19/96), 691 So.2d 715. In Howell, the exclusion raised the issue of whether the vessel was “operated” by the insured in part

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Jeffrey Simoneaux brought a qui tam action against his former employer, E.I. duPont de Nemours & Company (“du-Pont”),- under the False Claims Act (“FCA”). He contended that duPont had violated the reverse-false-claims provision, 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(G), by concealing an obligation to pay the United States a penalty arising fro

IRVING, P.J., dissenting: ¶ 84. I respectfully dissent, as I find no reversible error in the issues raised on appeal. *1265 I. Denial of Motion for an IME ¶ 85. The majority finds the trial court erred in denying Dr. Brooks and EMA’s motion and renewed motion for an IME. In doing so, the majority, i

518 S.E.2d 745 (1999) 238 Ga. App. 343 DENNIS v. The STATE. No. A99A0756. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 28, 1999. *746 Monique D. Moyse, Decatur, for appellant. *747 Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Christopher M. Quinn, Assistant District Attorney, for

[Cite as State v. Ruiter, 2023-Ohio-3594.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DUSTIN RUITER, Defendant-Appell

643 F.Supp.2d 1133 (2009) In re FLASH MEMORY ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Document Relates to All Actions. Case No. C 07-0086 SBA. United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division. March 31, 2009. *1137 Christopher Thomas Micheletti, Craig C. Corbitt, Francis Onofrei Scarpulla, Henry A. Cirillo, Judith A. Zahid, Zelle Ho

194 Ga. App. 676 (1990) 391 S.E.2d 780 RAYBURN v. THE STATE. A89A1775. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided February 19, 1990. Rehearing Denied March 5, 1990. Word & Flinn, Gerald P. Word, for appellant. William G. Hamrick, Jr., District Attorney, Monique F. Kirby, Assistant District Attorney, for app